tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post1709664964800937147..comments2023-11-24T03:49:26.587-08:00Comments on Man fined $1500.00 for looking for a job: November 12, 2015 UPDATE: Better communication; What do I do with this apology and encouragement to get legal assistance? Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-89290710784304475502015-11-14T05:32:01.637-08:002015-11-14T05:32:01.637-08:00So, you noticed the last paragraph, and the second...So, you noticed the last paragraph, and the second to the last sentence of the letter? "..., and the Attorney General's Office must defend the law as it currently stands."<br />What if a law is repugnant to the Supreme Law of the Land? Shouldn't the Attorney General place his Oath of Office above defending a law that is repugnant to the state and federal constitutions? Yes, he should. <br />You are right. There is collusion by the bar and government employees to overthrow the Supreme Law of the Land which did establish a republican form of government. There is no denying that fact, and the fact that the attorney "industry" profits from all the unconstitutional legislation, etc. They have pulled the wool over the eyes of the American people with all of their double speak, nice tone of words, and handsome 3 piece suits, etc. <br />Thanks for your comment. Hopefully the American people will wake up to what our government employees have been doing for decades.Russ Hindshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-70577166810920115492015-11-13T09:38:59.116-08:002015-11-13T09:38:59.116-08:00Seems to me you have just shown that the State off...Seems to me you have just shown that the State officer of Washington's Attorney General is an employment agent for the bar. Also that the state is in collusion with the bar to overthrow a republic form of government.acting under color of law and violating do process by taking away the mechanism of redress of grievance with out going through the court or a barred attorney ? just a thoughtAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16996714561600755374noreply@blogger.com