tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32251844876203182982024-03-13T10:44:02.306-07:00Man fined $1500.00 for looking for a jobRuss Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-85086912658452728532016-11-12T06:27:00.001-08:002016-11-12T06:27:46.536-08:00NOVEMBER 12, 2016 Submission to President-elect Donald Trump's website.Trump asks for ideas to make America great again. I have submitted the following:<br />
<br />
--America's bureaucrats at all levels have for too long been regressing away from our Supreme Law of the Land, ignoring their own Oath of Office and ignoring the life, limb, and treasure given by our military families to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. As Federal and state governments have grown out of control, the parasitical bureaucrats have even ignored U.S. Codes, broken our laws such as 18.242. The U.S. Justice Department, including the FBI, is tasked with enforcing U.S. Code 18.242: "Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;..." I have a simple and clear case to remind our public servants that good neighbors do their civic duty to support our Supreme Law of the Land. This case would empower the rank and file public servants to refuse unconstitutional directives from the corrupt executive bureaucrats. Instead of bureaucrats ignoring their own Oath and looking for ways to undermine our state and federal constitutions, a paradigm shift could break out among government employees looking for ways to support and preserve our Supreme Law of the Land for our posterity. The government employees have both denied my right to publish a list of my skills under the color of law, and refused to grant a trial by jury before seeking to extort $1500.00 in fines from me. My case is fully recorded with all correspondence from my public servants on my blog. It is too easy and too black and white. Here is a huge and simple opportunity to return this nation back to our founding principles. Please check it out; http://manfined1500forlookingforajob.blogspot.com/2015/03/march-26-2015-update-signed-complaint.html<br />
<br />
My case is too easy. I have done all the work here. The record is completely recorded on this blog. My fake and phony public servants have completely exposed themselves here. They need to be corrected so that other government employees will know what our Supreme Law of the Land is, and what it should mean to their own conduct.<br />
Enforcing US code 18.242 would create the paradigm shift that Donald Trump needs among government employees in order to "make America great again." <br />For our posterity, and for my father and 3 sons who have risked life, limb, and treasure to defend our Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. They fought foreign enemies while domestic enemies have been ignoring their Oath of Office and destroying our liberties protected in our Supreme Law of the Land here at home. <br />Pray for a paradigm shift. A return to liberty, and justice for all. A return to civility, responsibility, virtue, and honesty. <br />Dishonest government employees ignore and violate their own Oath of Office...Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-61346700871799515702016-01-15T07:10:00.003-08:002016-01-15T07:10:47.287-08:00January 15, 2016 UPDATE: No communication. I have not had any communication from the FBI, which is supposed to have received my complaint requesting enforcement of U.S. Code 18.241 & 242, from U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby's office. I have not had any lawyers contact me following my correspondence asking for their assistance. I have not heard anything from Washington Department of Labor and Industries, AND I have not heard anything more from the Washington State Attorney General's office.<br /> WDLI and all the government offices that have been involved with these unconstitutional citations DO KNOW where I stand and what they are up against. I am sure that they just want the whole thing swept under the rug so that they may continue their assault on our Supreme Law of the Land. They want no one in government to be held accountable and that means that they will not contact me any further to provoke anymore BLOGGING on this case. <br /> I am done with these people. They have learned what they will learn. I am, and have been, talking to walls. There is little more I can do. <br /> To my neighbors who work for the government, THANK YOU. Thank you for showing me your true colors and your childish fears of being held accountable to your Oath of Offices. I have learned much about weak minded government employees who fear the boogie man who signs their checks more than they are willing to support our state and federal constitutions. I know you guys like I know the back of my hand. I used to work for the government... and you should be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves. Your neighbors and fellow citizens of this nation have given life, limb, and treasure to preserve our constitutional republic and the rights that those contracts protect. Yet, you follow the out of control idiots in higher office, rather than follow the simple instructions upon which your jobs are established. Perhaps you know that your jobs and duties are not sanctioned by the state and federal constitutions, yet you pretend to be a necessary part of society rather than the burden that you truly are on society. Shame, shame, shame on you! Shame on you personally, for being such people of weak mind and character... May your deeds result in your just rewards. May you be treated the same way you have treated your fellow man when THE BOOK is opened to settle accounts. May the same injustice you have served upon others be served upon you. As for mercy for your sins, you have the same opportunity as everyone else. You can repent and have that epiphany I have spoken so much about in this blog. <br /><br /> I am done. <br /> I am informing the readers of this blog that I shall not be initiating any more contact with your government offices. Should you contact me, then I will respond in the same manner that I have been responding. That is all. Let your own actions be on your own head. Let your weak minds and weak character be known among all your family, friends, and neighbors. Let your posterity know that you aided and abetted and directly worked to subvert our Supreme Law of the Land. Let the truth be front and center in the eyes of ALL the American people. And let the American people exhaust their patience and long suffering concerning those who have disregarded our Supreme Law of the Land, and throw off the corrupt government employees of weak mind and character. <br /><br /> I shall take with me, the peace of mind, and the confidence that I did everything in my power to educate government employees and defend our state and federal constitutions for our posterity. My children will not look me in the eye and say, why didn't you do anything to preserve liberty, justice, and a constitutional government. May the children of weak minded government employees curse their parents for being people of weak and corrupt character, and for deliberately throwing our Supreme Law of the Land out the window. <br /><br />Thank you to all my readers. I am sure that you have learned right along with me, and I am sure you are appalled right along with me... God bless the good who love liberty and justice for all! <br /><br />Russ Hinds<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-20462452297829006672015-12-01T07:23:00.000-08:002015-12-01T19:30:05.821-08:00December 1, 2015 UPDATE: Seeking help from attorneys. I finally decided what to do with the nice letter from Senior Assistant Attorney General Stephen T. Reinmuth. I sent letters of request to a couple of civil rights organizations to see if I could get their attention. With the letters, I also sent copies of Stephen's letter. Perhaps these civil rights attorneys will decide to give me a hand. <br />
Before I publish my letter of request on this blog, I want to untangle some nonsense that is found in Stephen's letter. You see, these government employees are like most Americans. They are shallow thinkers. They hear a clever cliche and don't bother to think it through. They just go on repeating it as if it is the gospel truth. Then, since they fall for the snippet, they act and perform their duties as if the incomplete cliche is gospel and complete. Then they try to get the public, ME, to fall for the nonsense the same way they do. <br />
I have already untangled a lot of nonsense coming from government employees, but let me list a couple here. First, I untangled the application and jurisdiction of "Administrative Law." Administrative Law governs the administration of a government program. Administrative law governs people who sign up to participate in the government program. Administrative law does not apply to the general public who has not signed away their constitutionally protected rights in order to participate in the government program. Administrative law does not overrule constitutionally protected rights and liberties. SIMPLE! It can't get any simpler!<br />
Another bunch of nonsense I untangled is the "Helping the Local Handyman" bill that Rep. Shelley Short introduced to the legislature. These legislators, and all government employees, need to simply uphold our Supreme Law of the Land and repeal unconstitutional legislation, not introduce more nonsensical laws to fix unconstitutional laws. What is so hard to understand about that? Didn't they all take an Oath of Office to support our contracts between We the People and their public servants? It is so frustrating trying to communicate with people who are stuck in la-la land and who willfully refuse to come back to simple reality.<br />
Okay, the nonsense and deceit in Reinmuth's letter that needs to be untangled is found in his second to the last sentence.<i> "Until there is a change in the electrical contractor law, the Department of Labor and Industries must enforce, and the Attorney General's Office must defend, the law as it currently stands." </i>Does Reinmuth really expect me to fall for that nonsense? Is he forgetting his Oath of Office regarding our Supreme Law of the Land and my right to publish a list of my skills, and my right to a speedy trial by jury? Reinmuth is thinking shallow. He takes his "cliche" directive to mean that he is required to defend legislation, regulations, and statutes that are clearly unconstitutional, thus nullifying our Supreme Law of the Land. Nullifying our Supreme Law of the Land is equal to disregarding his own Oath of Attorney. His position and words to me are completely untenable. Is he really that stupid? Evidently so, and it appears that nearly all government employees are in la-la land doing the same thing. From my perspective, all of this is ridiculous. The citations I received are clearly unconstitutional, and correcting the mistake is way too simple! Yet, the government employees continue to make fools of themselves believing their nonsensical cliches and unconstitutional directives. Our Supreme Law of the Land is written in 6th grade English. It is easily understood by the people who ratified our state and federal constitutions, but these foolish government employees pretend that our constitutions cannot be understood by themselves or by We the People. These government employees defer to to the State and Federal Supreme Courts to tell us what our constitutions really mean. Once again, more ridiculousness! What is a simple and clear thinking person like myself supposed to do with this onslaught of ridiculous nonsense? The citations are absolutely clear nonsense and unconstitutional, yet government employees PRETEND that they are not nonsense! How do you rescue people from PRETEND? How do you pull people out of la-la land when they prefer to invent more nonsense and lies in order to stay in la-la land? SHEESH! ...at least it is as amusing to me. It should be embarrassing to them! Good grief!<br />
There, I untangled some more nonsense... Here is the letter I wrote in hopes of getting some help from attorneys who are not in la-la land. [Reinmuth's letter to me is uploaded to my previous UPDATE, November 12, 2015]<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
November 30, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: Attorney</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds</div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
SUBJECT: First Amendment case</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Dear Mr. Attorney,</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Please find the enclosed letter
from Stephen T. Reinmuth, Senior Assistant Attorney General of
Washington State, which is in regard to my dispute with Washington
Department of Labor and Industries. The dispute is over 2 citations
with fines totaling $1500.00 issued to me by WDLI for publishing a
list of my skills and posting that list on a private bulletin board
in an effort to serve my neighbors and make new friends.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The letter asks me to seek legal
counsel in my dispute so that my perspective on the administrative
law (RCW 19.28) may be properly presented to the appropriate public
servants in charge of interpreting and enforcing the law. In my view,
the tone of the letter implies that the public servants would like to
have the dispute clarified and resolved correctly according to our
state and federal constitutions FOR THEM so that they may do their
job better in compliance with their Oath of Office/Attorney. My
experience dealing with these public servants makes it obvious that
they are doing their job by the seat of their pants without the
courage to go against the government employee crowd (the machine)
which has disregarded our constitutionally protected rights for the
last 5 decades, and more.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
It is my belief and hope that
correctly resolving the unconstitutional issuance of fines for
hanging an innocent flier on a private bulletin board in accordance
with our Supreme Law of the Land will result in more confidence and
courage on the part of public servants who honestly desire to abide
by their Oath of Office/Attorney. Public servants adhering to their
Oath will bring back some sanity to out of control government...<br />
From you, I am seeking a phone conversation to discuss ways I may
pursue victory in standing up for my constitutionally protected
rights. Obviously, I am not pursuing this for my own benefit, but for
the benefit of all people who desire the freedom and rights protected
in our contract with government employees. However, there is some
just compensation desired on my part in order to be made whole
regarding the expense of appeals and the income lost due to my loss
of liberty and due process of law.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
In today's out of control
government, if we do not exorcise our rights, we lose them.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Please respond via the address, phone,
or email above.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Much appreciation for your time,
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Russ Hinds enclosure, 2 pages</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
I would love to get a response from these attorneys. It would be very refreshing to speak to people who do not reside in la-la land. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-17096649648009371472015-11-12T09:50:00.001-08:002015-11-12T09:50:27.749-08:00November 12, 2015 UPDATE: Better communication; What do I do with this apology and encouragement to get legal assistance? On the 6th of November I received an email from the office of Attorney General Bob Ferguson which contained a PDF response to my letter informing them of the embarrassing inaccurate response sent to me by his Assistant Attorney General Linda Williams. This PDF letter is very readable! Wow! How about that? It even contains an apology for the inaccurate first response from Williams. There is also a large paragraph that encourages me to seek assistance from an attorney to find "other legal remedies regarding the constitutionality of the state law in question." He even gives me an email address and a phone number to contact for assistance. This is quite interesting...<br />
My instant analyzation of this good letter gives me the impression that the whole group of government employees I am dealing with are "just doing their job" without sticking their neck out to make a point of "doing their job according to the plain English of our state and federal constitutions." You see, they want someone to tell them that it is okay to do their job according to our Supreme Law of the Land. They can't make that decision on their own because it might upset the chain of command. This letter makes me feel like I have to do their job for them to get permission for government employees to abide by their own Oath of Office/Attorney. Where is the joy for their own heart if I have to make it safe for them to do their job correctly under the restraints of our state and federal constitutions? There is no joy for them if I do all the work while they remain incapacitated by their self-preservation and fear of upsetting the apple cart. After it is safe for them to come out of hiding, then they may find some joy and relief by doing their job correctly--"correctly" means not ignoring our constitutions while assaulting their neighbors with unconstitutional legislation and enforcement.<br />
Here is how our state and federal governments have gotten out of control. The lower ranking government employees just go with the flow, following orders without protesting unconstitutional law and directives from their supervisors. The cronies in the top executive offices want to maintain the status quo and pat themselves on the back for "protecting the public," and whatever other bullshit that they want to justify their existence with. Unconstitutional incompetence run amok! And no government employee has the stones to stand up for their own Oath of Office. <br /> Meanwhile, I am fascinated at a government employee, a low rank Inspector Phillip Jordan, who willingly MAILS a citation to his neighbor for hanging a truthful flyer on a bulletin board. How can that guy do that? I couldn't do that. If an infraction was worthy of my attention, I would go give the guy a citation face to face, NOT MAIL IT! Chickenshit dipshits working for the government can phone a neighbor and lie to him to get a mailing address, but can't even read the simple English of our state and federal constitutions, AND THEN THE WHOLE CABAL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES CIRCLE THE WAGONS AROUND THEIR UNCONSTITUTIONAL CITATIONS! And then, when I finally get a decent response from a government employee, that employee wants me to get an attorney to help me fix things for them??? FREAKING AMAZING! Well, I would like to fix things for them, but they can fix it themselves if they will simply abide by their own Oath of Office! Does all this shit seem totally ridiculous to you? <br /> I won the argument here from the very beginning. I really did. I even correctly pointed out that administrative law does not apply to the general public, and that if it did apply, our state and federal constitutions are Supreme OVER administrative law. Good grief!<br />
Here is the letter from Senior Assistant Attorney General Stephen T. Reinmuth:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixtn8pwcS7bPGV4NNx9kByQZL5Xi9iX0RsCcw3edpsOODod2yRXhn2bHJq6PRNZXnLn60G4NvgbR5wGnvFOpVgrvrf3o3Nopy4b3YYuOEqC4-DbkKWczpBOHhwOuiLmEs3q7APRDWLZHY/s1600/AG+Bob+Ferg.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixtn8pwcS7bPGV4NNx9kByQZL5Xi9iX0RsCcw3edpsOODod2yRXhn2bHJq6PRNZXnLn60G4NvgbR5wGnvFOpVgrvrf3o3Nopy4b3YYuOEqC4-DbkKWczpBOHhwOuiLmEs3q7APRDWLZHY/s640/AG+Bob+Ferg.jpeg" width="464" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0cLJgU-pRKyMkKsIQrMZF_wz41OQ795Ax4CYEn9tpGhqAoQ3xYJRw_uGNYmFaEpMTZpNfqUC6JGiUIYq3XV4palSPHHhIWZAwsSoFfXje2KqIdLsVPJAXe_TdvbA2x7350V_m8CyHV6k/s1600/AG+Bob+Ferg2.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0cLJgU-pRKyMkKsIQrMZF_wz41OQ795Ax4CYEn9tpGhqAoQ3xYJRw_uGNYmFaEpMTZpNfqUC6JGiUIYq3XV4palSPHHhIWZAwsSoFfXje2KqIdLsVPJAXe_TdvbA2x7350V_m8CyHV6k/s640/AG+Bob+Ferg2.jpeg" width="464" /></a></div>
See? It is a nice letter, but what am I supposed to do with it? Perhaps I will take it to a constitutional attorney if I can find one, and see if he would like to help me fix things for the government employees so that they do not have to be conflicted between following orders and adhering to their Oath of Office. <br /> Anybody know of a good constitutional attorney? Any other suggestions? Maybe I should run for governor on the platform, "Good neighbors, and good government employees, do their civic duty to uphold our state and federal constitutions." My goodness! Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-35173250689905786202015-10-15T05:48:00.000-07:002015-10-15T05:50:52.403-07:00October 15, 2015, UPDATE: Patiently waiting... I have waited over a month for a response from my government employee Assistant Attorney General Linda Williams, after correcting her nonsensical correspondence which contained inaccuracies in almost every sentence. Obviously, she does not want to respond to me and correctly resolve my unconstitutional citations--resolve them according to our Supreme Law of the Land and her own Oath of Attorney. Quote from her inacccurate letter which she sent to me: "There is no further action that can be taken on the matter by this office." This just goes to show you what kind of people hold government office today.<br />
Well, I decided to write again to Attorney General Bob Ferguson. He needs to be kept informed of what his underlings are doing because he likely assumes that they are competently resolving issues when he asks them to, just as he asked AAG Linda Williams. If he never hears from me again, he will naturally assume that all has been taken care of...<br />
It has not been taken care of. Here is my letter to Ferguson:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
October 9, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: Attorney General Bob Ferguson</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
1125 Washington Street SE</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
P.O. Box 40100 </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Olympia, WA 98504-0100</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
1**** **** Ln</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
*****, WA 9****</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509)2**-****</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
SUBJECT: Important information you may
need in order to properly supervise your assistants.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Timeline:
</div>
<ol>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
As requested by U.S. Attorney Mike
Ormsby, I forwarded a copy of my <span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>COMPLAINT
seeking enforcement of 18 USC 241 and 242</b></span></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">
to your office on August 1, 2015.</span></span></div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Your
office passed my COMPLAINT down to AAG Linda Williams. Evidently,
your office and yourself expected AAG Williams to properly respond
to me in order to resolve my COMPLAINT according to Constitutional
guidelines.</span></div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">AAG
Williams responded to me with a letter that contained many
inaccuracies which I was required to correct in order to maintain
simple and clear communication. [AAG William's letter and my
response correcting her/our communication are enclosed with this
letter in order that you may be kept informed of what your
underlings are doing]</span></div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">My
letter correcting our communication was sent on September 5, 2015.
Over one month has passed without receiving an acknowledgment of the
corrections from AAG Williams. </span>
</div>
</li>
</ol>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Attorney
General Bob Ferguson, </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">This
letter is informing you of problems within the offices which you are
the leader and supervisor. Please make yourself aware of these
problems by reading the enclosed correspondence. Your assistant's
official correspondence is embarrassing to your office and to you
personally. Incompetence and ignorance in government offices
concerning our good neighbor civic duty to support our Supreme Law of
the Land is an outlandish ridiculous development in today's
government employees. Especially, considering the fact that the
people's representatives have written U.S. Code 18.241 and 242 in
order to provide penalties for government employees who disregard our
Supreme Law of the Land.<br /><br />As of today, I have not received a
timely response from AAG Linda Williams. It appears to me that she
does not intend to respond to me, choosing instead to ignore the
simple constitutional issues which are brought to the fore by my
COMPLAINT. Please note that resolution to my unconstitutional fines
and loss of liberty could not be made simpler if only government
employees would abide by their Oath of Office/Attorney. I'm asking
for your personal effort to see that my unconstitutional fines are
withdrawn and that all government employees abide by our state and
and federal constitutions. ...Please don't embarrass yourself and
other government employees any further. We the People have been
watching the decline of good government for decades—even trying to
head it off! You know what I am saying is true...<br /><br />Thank you,</span></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> enclosures</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br /><br /> Will Ferguson respond to me? I wonder... I don't think that he has the integrity and courage to respond. I'll even place bets on it. Instead of serving We the People under the constraints of our state and federal constitutions, he has a government and a bunch of government employees that he needs to protect and circle the wagons around.<br /> Isn't it fun learning what your government employees are made of? It kind of blows away your hope that they are doing their job correctly and competently. They need an epiphany back to the Supreme Law of the Land and "Good neighbors do their civic duty to support and abide by our state and federal constitutions." </span></div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-18789520898463222172015-09-02T21:28:00.001-07:002015-09-03T05:31:54.176-07:00September 2, 2015, UPDATE: I received a response from WA Attorney General Bob Ferguson regarding my letter and COMPLAINT. It is both amusing and annoying... What can I say? Attempting to communicate with government employees about things that they do not want to deal with is amusing and annoying. The documents I sent to AG Bob Ferguson were passed on to an assistant attorney general in the Labor and Industries Division. Obviously, Ferguson did not want to supervise his underlings in Labor and Industries Division. He did not want to keep himself informed of what his underlings are doing...<br />
Government is a mess because there is no leadership at the top who insist on all government employees following their Oath of Office. The primary focus of all government employees is revenue generation and protecting their job. That is it! That is all they care about. Government is corrupt.<br />
Here is the incomprehensible letter from AAG Linda Williams:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhABfxVP2N-PL3jTwseO18gLYc3CaEvzrAeUUZnzNTEWhRIsu17pjyCHC9Vsn9q0Jhx-BqyIr5gIcExB1C0pmqOa33U2jnr6s96b3fauMXh27qeuQZ1BIP5mbSrvWtT0q-al111pztOZBg/s1600/AAG+linda+williams.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhABfxVP2N-PL3jTwseO18gLYc3CaEvzrAeUUZnzNTEWhRIsu17pjyCHC9Vsn9q0Jhx-BqyIr5gIcExB1C0pmqOa33U2jnr6s96b3fauMXh27qeuQZ1BIP5mbSrvWtT0q-al111pztOZBg/s320/AAG+linda+williams.jpeg" width="232" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
She says in her first sentence that I left a voice mail. I didn't. Is she confusing me with another annoyed victim of unconstitutional bureaucratic citations? Good grief! I had to respond in order to correct her inaccuracies. What a mess! These people are pitiful! Here is my letter back to her, mailed today: </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
September 5, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: Assistant Attorney General Linda
Williams</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Labor & Industries Division</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
P.O. Box 40121 </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Olympia, WA 98504-0121</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
1****** **** Ln</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Elk, WA 99009</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509)2**-****</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="mailto:creekmaster@aol.com">creekmaster@aol.com</a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Dear AAG Williams,</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Thank you for your written
correspondence dated August 21, 2015, regarding my packet of
documents which I sent to AG Bob Ferguson as instructed by U.S.
Attorney Mike Ormsby. However, I do not appreciate being totally
confused by the inaccurate statements made in your correspondence!
<br />
<br />
Your first sentence thanks me “for your recent voice mail.”
Sorry, I have not left a voice mail with AG Ferguson's office. I
simply followed Ormsby's instructions to seek resolution through the
WA AG's office by sending Ferguson a copy of my <i><b>Complaint
seeking enforcement of 18 USC 241 and 242, </b></i>which
was filed with Ormsby's U.S. Attorney's Office. <br />
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Your next paragraph points out that
your office cannot “provide legal advice to citizens.” I am not
looking for legal advice, I am looking for government employees who
will competently take actions according to their Oath of
Office/Attorney and correct bureaucratic over-reach and violations of
our Supreme Law of the Land. May we have an honest conversation
“citizen to citizen” regarding your constitutional directives as
a public servant to support our Supreme Law of the Land? Good
neighbors do their civic duty to support our Supreme Law of the Land.
Much life, limb, and treasure has been given to defend our Supreme
Law of the Land and preserve it for our posterity...<br />
<br />
Now, I
regret to say that it is impossible to communicate with neighbors
employed by the government who seem to communicate in inaccuracies
and wrong assumptions. For clarity of understanding between you and
I, let me correct your letter by sentence. Your words are in
italics:<br />
<i>“Your complaint and phone message indicate that you
plan to file a lawsuit for the violation of your constitutional
rights.”</i>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
There was no phone message. Are you
confusing my correspondence with another victim of government
over-reach who phoned your office in distress seeking relief from
public servants who ignore their Oaths of Office and our Supreme Law
of the Land? Please help the poor guy! He is your neighbor, not an
enemy of the state!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
As you should be able to see from the
correspondence I sent you, I do not intend to file a lawsuit, rather,
I am continuing to look for government employees who will do their
good neighbor civic duty to uphold and abide by our state and federal
constitutions and correct the mistakes of bureaucrats who issue
citations which fine people for posting truthful fliers on private
bulletin boards in violation of our 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment to our
Bill of Rights. Then, these same bureaucrats deny their good neighbor
the constitutionally protected right to a speedy trial by jury of
good neighbors.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The correspondence I sent you clearly
seeks enforcement of <i>U.S. Code 18 242 and 241</i> through the
office of U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby. His office, along with the FBI,
are charged with enforcing the U.S. Code. Are their any government
employees who will do their job competently and with good conscience?
That is all I am asking. We have state and federal constitutions
which were written expressly for government employees to do their job
by. I do not need to file a lawsuit to ask my government employees to
do their job correctly. Now, I know that is not difficult for anyone
to understand, however, government employees and politicians have
been ignoring our Supreme Law of the Land for so many decades, it may
take an epiphany on their part to bring them back to simple reality.
Please have that epiphany, if you can.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
According to the constitutions, the
powers of government are divided into three branches, NOT
CONSOLIDATED IN THE BUREAUCRACY. Meaning--according to our state and
federal constitutions, bureaucracies cannot write regulations,
statutes, and laws; enforce regulations, statutes, and laws; and
adjudicate regulations, statutes, and laws. Our Declaration of
Independence was written because the king's minions were doing just
that to the colonists at the time prior to the U.S. Revolutionary
War, 1775-1783. [Why do I have to write this stuff for my government
employees?]
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<i>Based on the paperwork you
submitted, it appears that you did not prevail in your proceedings
with the Office of Administrative Hearings.”</i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
After denying my request for a speedy
trial by jury, Administrative Law Judge Mark Kim made it illegal for
himself to abide by his Oath of Attorney by stating quote, <b>“The
Office of Administrative Hearings is unable to render an opinion
regarding the constitutionality of 19.28 RCW. Addressing these
arguments falls outside of the scope of what this Tribunal has
authority to address. '[T]he power of an administrative tribunal to
fashion a remedy is strictly limited by statute.'”</b> How crazy is
that? Good neighbors do their civic duty to uphold our Supreme Law of
the Land. Does ALJ Mark Kim believe that his civic duty has been
removed from him by statute?</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<i>Our records indicate that you
appealed this decision to the Spokane County Superior Court, where
the decision of the Administrative Hearings Board was affirmed.”</i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Both judges, Marianne Mareno and
Gregory Sipolt, each hearing one of the two citations issued for the
same flier on the same bulletin board on the same day, denied my
requests for my constitutionally protected right to a speedy trial by
jury. Evidently, they decided to pretend that our state and federal
constitutions do not exist, and that their Oaths of Office do not
exist. Both judges ignored my right to publish a list of my skills,
and agreed with AAG Angela Zurlini, when she incorrectly stated in
her trial brief, <b>“Mr. Hinds does not have a right to a jury in
this case.”</b> Zurlini simply threw our Supreme Law of the Land
out the window. The citations could have been resolved in less than
six weeks if my constitutionally protected right to a speedy trial by
jury would have been granted hastily following the issuance of the
citations. Dozens of government employees making a mockery of justice
and conducting a circus of nonsense attempting to convince me that I
am a bad neighbor who deserves to pay the government employees
$1500.00 for hanging an innocent flier on a private bulletin board
simply is not going to work with me. If government employees accuse
me of being a bad neighbor who is a danger to his neighbors in order
to justify fines and loss of liberty, then we have a constitutionally
prescribed process to determine guilt or innocence, the speedy trial
by jury. What I am writing here in this letter is simple and clear.
Any good neighbor on a jury panel would be able to clearly understand
what I have written here. AND, that is exactly why government
employees have denied my constitutionally protected right to a speedy
trial by jury in order to preserve their “policing for profit”
scheme. Bureaucracies get away with their schemes because our
neighbors know that our public servants will not abide by their Oath
of Office and that it costs more to dispute an unconstitutional
citation than to just pay the fine. Me thinks you guys are not
supposed to work that way.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<i>The Washington State Court of
Appeals further agreed with the Board.”</i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The Washington State Court of Appeals
did not rule on the Board's decision. Rather, my Request for Fee
Waiver was denied by the Washington State Supreme Court. The Court of
Appeals never heard my case.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<i>Although your fine was reduced,
it is clear you were dissatisfied with the outcome.”</i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Neither of the unconstitutional fines
were reduced. I am dissatisfied with the outcome, and I am
dissatisfied with communication that contains so many inaccuracies
that it makes communication impossible.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<i>Further, your letter expresses
your frustration because you were cited because you put up a flier
indicating that you perform electrical work.”</i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I have been performing electrical work
since the time I was in high school, then throughout all of the jobs
I have had in construction, maintenance, and government employment. I
have never sought government permission to perform my services for
my employers or any of my good neighbors who needed my services.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<i>While I empathize with your
exasperation, there is no further action that can be taken on the
matter by this office.”</i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Constitutionally bound public servants
should not exasperate the public whom they are supposed to be serving
under the constraints of our state and federal constitutions<span style="font-family: inherit;">. <b>“</b><b>I</b><span style="color: #444444;"><b>n
questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man,
but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the constitution.”
THOMAS JEFFERSON</b></span><span style="color: #444444;">
</span>
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">There
is more your office could do in keeping with your Oath of
Office/Attorney, but your “empathy” is appreciated. Good grief!
Why not be a normal human being and give a care about our Supreme Law
of the Land and the life, limb, and treasure sacrificed to preserve
the Supreme Law of the Land? What “invisible hand” is keeping you
from being a normal human being who cares about her neighbors?</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">“<i>I
understand that you plan to file a lawsuit.”</i></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">No,
I do not plan to file a lawsuit. That would be a waste of time and
money. However, I am still looking for government employees who are
willing to abide by our state and federal constitutions, and their
Oath of Office/Attorney. I have all the evidence you need in order
to correct and constrain out of control bureaucracies and government
employees. Just ask for the evidence, and I will gladly provide it to
you.
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">“<i>Please
do not hesitate to contact me directly to address further concerns.”</i></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">I
have contacted you directly through this letter in order to address
further concerns. My letter is written in simple English which any
literate American ought to be able to understand. The points that I
made are clear and concise and cannot be refuted because they are
true. It is your duty as a public servant to abide by and preserve
our state and federal constitutions for ourselves and our posterity.
If you cannot bring yourself to do your civic duty, then you should
not be in public office.
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">As
a citizen not employed by the government, I have limited resources to
hold government employees to their Oath of Office. That is precisely
why we have Oaths of Office for our public servants!
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Obviously,
the vast majority of public servants ignore our Supreme Law of the
Land and their own Oath of Office/Attorney while they use the full
force of government resources to obliterate an individual's rights
and liberties. <i><b>WASHINGTON
STATE CONSTITUTION Article 1 Section 1 “All political power is
inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from
the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and
maintain individual rights.”</b></i>
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">You, Linda Williams,
have our state and federal constitutions to back you up should you
decide to uphold them rather than pretend that they do not exist.
Please do not follow the crowd employed by the government who are
blindly leading our once great country into tyranny in order to
generate revenue and protect their jobs. Please feel free to call or
write. I would love to hear from you again.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Sincerely,
</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Russ Hinds</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> My goodness! Am I communicating with children? Are there any adults employed by government? Can I maintain any hope for government employees? Can they be saved? Can they be taught to abide by their Oath of Office/Attorney?</span></div>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> Children like to play "pretend." Make believe land is great fun for children. Government employees like to pretend unalienable rights do not exist. La-la land is great fun for government employees... They like to pretend that the people they persecute and extort are bad guys... because that generates revenue for their salaries, benefits, and pensions...</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"> They need the epiphany out of la-la land...</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-76024666768385618352015-08-02T08:20:00.000-07:002015-08-02T08:51:59.005-07:00August 2, 2015, UPDATE: Finally got a response from U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby regarding my COMPLAINT in federal court. On July 20, 2015, three months after sending U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby a copy of my complaint, I received a letter from ??? ...well, it is hard to tell who it is from. There are 3 different names on the signature line. Ormsby's name is typed first, an illegible signature followed by "for" is under Ormsby's typed name, and Arne Ahmed, Assistant U.S. Attorney is under the handwritten signature. I think the practice of signing documents by persons other than the writer of the document is pretty new. I was raised to take responsibility for my words and actions. If my office needed to send out a document under my authority, I would take the 3 seconds to review it and sign it myself. ---It used to be that way, but when I worked for the National Park Service in the '80s I noticed a lot of silly things going on. I needed to correspond with the GSA motor pool coordinator and was told how to write my correspondence. I wrote my letter my own way, diffused a controversy, and corrected an error in the procurement of 2 vehicles for the National Monument where I worked. The GSA motor pool coordinator and I got along very well after that because I did not attempt to demand and bully him in changing the vehicle replacements from pick-ups to SUVs. I simply pointed out that I wanted to work with him to make his job easier, and that I did not want to be opponents at loggerheads.---<br />
Anyway, Ormsby's letter is short, claiming that he does not accept complaints from citizens, and that I need to work through Washington state's Attorney General. LOL! How crazy is that? I mean the Assistant Attorney General Angela Zurlini has been my opponent in my APPEALs.<br />
It is standard procedure for government employees to avoid taking responsibility while passing the buck. They also like to misdirect us "ignorant citizens" who have a "personal problem with government and government authority." Put the disgruntled citizens on a wild goose chase to get them distracted and off the plate. That is the best way for government official to dodge adhering to their Oath of Office when adhering to it would make waves within the government system of things. We used to have statesmen who would stick their neck out to guard our Supreme Law of the Land. We don't have those anymore, and certainly not in the bureaucratic levels of government. Grabbing the ball and rocking the boat by curtailing out of control government upsets too many government employees. Bureaucarts love their jobs, and if they are painted in a bad light, they get very upset. Ormsby sure as heck does not want to enforce U.S. Code 18.241 and 242 by charging the WDLI inspectors, AAG Angela Zurlini, and the two Superior court judges for violating the U.S. Code.<br />
Here is the letter from Ormsby's office:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdv2XL3y1J4aSgSF4kWbyu0w4Kj1q7rqCbcXdZeRcaxx0L2xzAV1amW83pcZKp9lnZZn3vz-29BkOTfq2lYTbcpoT4SOF6_MReDzsf78yMux9lv_di4mNY32VLg5nO-6iKL14t5wXF3O4/s1600/Letter+from+US+Attoney+Mike+Ormsby%2527s+office.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdv2XL3y1J4aSgSF4kWbyu0w4Kj1q7rqCbcXdZeRcaxx0L2xzAV1amW83pcZKp9lnZZn3vz-29BkOTfq2lYTbcpoT4SOF6_MReDzsf78yMux9lv_di4mNY32VLg5nO-6iKL14t5wXF3O4/s320/Letter+from+US+Attoney+Mike+Ormsby%2527s+office.jpeg" width="232" /></a></div>
Do you see what We the People are up against? We are up against human nature. It is natural for government employees to protect government and other government employees. It is not human nature to admit mistakes by government and government employees. Admitting mistakes upsets a lot of people, especially the ones who made the mistakes. And the ones who made the mistakes in my case are many. It includes a whole department of state government that has been "policing for profit" for a long, long time. That is a huge, HUGE mistake that would entirely overturn the apple cart in Washington State government, showing that all the government paid lawyers who went along with the nonsense to be incompetent in their duties and disregarding their Oath of Attorney. It has taken decades for government incompetence and misuse of authority to move from where it was in 1950 to where bureaucracy is today. Turning the apple cart around would bring a huge shock to state and federal government. Maintaining the status quo is the standard for all government employees because that is much easier than admitting government overreach which might result in government employees losing their jobs by downsizing government.<br />
That is what it is... That is the simple truth, and little ol' Russ is making a fuss. He needs to be "the bad guy," the "disgruntled citizen who has extreme disdain for government." Well, I do not have extreme disdain for government. Good government is necessary, however, what we have now, after 50 years of disregarding our Supreme Law of the Land, IS NOT GOOD GOVERNMENT!<br />
Here is my letter back to Ormsby with further inquiry into who exactly has my COMPLAINT:<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
August 1, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: U.S Attorney Michael C. Ormsby</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Suite 340 Thomas S. Foley U.S.
Courthouse</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
P.O. Box 1494</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Spokane, WA 99210-1494</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
***********e</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
**********</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
***********</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
SUBJECT: Further inquiry regarding
<i><b>Complaint Seeking enforcement of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242</b></i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Mr. Ormsby,
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Thank
you for sending my <i><b>Complaint Seeking enforcement
of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242 </b></i>directly
to the FBI as stated in the letter your office sent to me dated July
17, 2015 [copy attached]. I appreciate all efforts to resolve the
issues cited in the Complaint, however, your letter fails to note
exactly who in the FBI has received my Complaint. Who may I contact
regarding the status and resolution of my complaint?
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Did your office, or the FBI offices, assign a tracking number to
my Complaint? Please provide the name of a local FBI representative
to whom I may personally submit my complaint so that I may be kept
informed of the process, progress, and official record regarding
proper resolution of the Complaint. I am having a tremendous amount
of difficulty finding a government employee who will joyfully take up
the task of upholding our Supreme Law of the Land and our U.S. Code
18. 241 and 242.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Let it be on record here in this letter that I have been given
the run around by the gentleman who answers the 1-800 number for the
local FBI offices. It turns out that he works from an office in
Washington DC, and he will not cooperate by giving me an address to
officially submit my Complaint with the FBI.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Let it also be noted that I am making every reasonable effort
toward submitting and resolving my Complaint with the proper
person(s) responsible for enforcement of our U.S. Code according to
their Oath of Office to uphold our Supreme Law of the Land.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
As requested in your letter, I will send a copy of my Complaint
to the Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson along with
copies of our correspondence. We do need to work together to get
proper resolution according to our Supreme Law of the Land. I am more
than willing to discuss the Complaint with any and all government
employees who are required to bring the Complaint to an
intellectually honest and correct resolution, however, I seem to be a
sort of “hot potato” or nuisance to government employees who may
desire to avoid controversy over our good neighbor civic duty to
uphold our Supreme Law of the Land. [Note the irony!]</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Please provide me the name of the person with the FBI to whom you
sent my Complaint so that I may be kept informed and included in the
timely process and resolution. The issues within the complaint have
spanned almost 4 years, a ridiculous amount of time! And over this
time period there has not been any government employees who are
willing to be accountable for their actions and/or lack of action.
For an example, please note the ridiculous signature on your letter
to me:
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Cathy Harris [? illegible] for
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Arne Ahmed, Assistant United States Attorney</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<i>
--under your--</i></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Very truly yours,
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
MICHAEL C. ORMSBY, United States Attorney.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Who
is “Cathy Harris?” Is she the mail clerk? The fall guy? The
lowest rank government employee with the least amount of protection
from accountability? I used to work for the federal government. I
know how government employees desire to avoid being held accountable
for their actions and/or lack of action. Muddling up simple issues
which can be clearly and correctly resolved by adhering to our
Supreme Law of the Land is common among government employees because
there is a large block of high ranking government employees who have
deliberately placed the simple 6<sup>th</sup>
grade wording of our Supreme Law of the Land in dispute and debate in
their effort to increase the size and power of government.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
My Complaint is a wonderful way of educating government employees
to find the joy of being good neighbors who do their civic duty to
uphold our state and federal constitutions. Many of our good
neighbors have given life, limb, and treasure under their Oath to
“defend our constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic”
in war and foreign conflicts [my father and 3 of my sons included].
It seems to me that the risks assumed by our military servicemen are
much much greater than the risks of ranking bureaucrats who cowardly
desire to avoid accountability and the controversy that may be
generated by competently and confidently taking a stand “defending
our constitution” in their cushy air conditioned government
offices. Is defending our Supreme Law of the Land risky and
dangerous in government offices? <br />
I am very much sorrowed by
all of the obfuscation, intellectual dishonesty, and lack of
accountability that I have witnessed throughout appealing the
$1500.00 in 2 citations issued for hanging a truthful flier on a
private bulletin board. From the beginning, the inspectors who issued
the citations did not sign their names to the citation on the line
provided for accountability. Neither did one of the inspectors sign
his official statement regarding our phone conversation. This is
pitiful and completely embarrassing for government employees! --You
will note that I do sign my letters and documents... [and the
inspectors mailed the citations rather than handing them to me face
to face with a show of credentials! Good grief!]<br />
Neighbor to
neighbor, decent human being to decent human being, I am asking for
your help. I have been looking for good neighbor government employees
who are not afraid of adult conversations regarding such
controversial issues such as our Supreme Law of the Land and Oaths of
Office/Oaths of Attorney. Please help me further along resolving the
issues cited in my Complaint. <br />
<br />
Very sincerely,
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Attachment included</div>
<br />
<br />
Integrity... self respect... courage... desire to lead in the right direction according to the Oath of Office... Do government employees have those qualities? Does Ormsby have them? We shall see.<br />
So, I sent a letter and a copy of my COMPLAINT to Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson. What will he do with it? Ignore me for months and months? Toss it in the garbage can? Send me on another wild goose chase, like "Hey Russ, you need to work with the legislature to get the law changed." ??? NO! NO! NO! I do not need to work with the legislature. ALL OF YOU GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEED TO ABIDE BY YOUR OATHS OF OFFICE and correct your mistakes!<br />
We the People are not the problem. We the People do not need training in adhering to our state and federal constitutions. Government employees need training in adhering to our state and federal constitutions, the Supreme Law of the Land!<br />
If government employees want to deny my right to publish a list of my skills and deny my right to a jury trial of good neighbors, then they need to get We the People to change the Supreme Law of the Land first! We the People have not changed the documents that have chartered our state and federal governments. Incompetent government employees, incompetent government paid lawyers, and incompetent legislators have disregarded our state and federal constitutions for too many decades. No government employee can show me where We the People have changed our Supreme Law of the Land. On the contrary, We the People have given life, limb and treasure to preserve the Supreme Law of the Land for our posterity... simple, simple, simple! Get over it! And admit your mistakes!<br />
Here is my letter to Washington State Attorney General Bob Feruson:<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
August 1, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: Attorney General Bob Ferguson</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
1125 Washington Street SE</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
P.O. Box 40100 </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Olympia, WA 98504-0100</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
1********</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
*********</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509)*******</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
SUBJECT: U.S. Attorney Ormsby's
instructions for the enclosed complaint</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Mr Ferguson,
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Please find the enclosed
correspondence with U.S Attorney Mike Ormsby regarding his
instruction to file the enclosed COMPLAINT with your office. <br />
By reviewing the enclosed documents, you will find that I have had a
very difficult time insisting that my constitutionally protected
rights and liberties be upheld by Washington Department of Labor and
Industries employees. Apparently, if We he People do not stand up for
our rights and liberties, we will lose them to government employees
who seem to willfully disregard our Supreme Law of the Land and our
Washington State Constitution.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
You may also find benefit from my
blog which thoroughly records my efforts to educate government
employees concerning our Supreme Law of the Land, the history and
significance of our founding principles, and the Oaths of
Office/Attorney our public servants are required to agree with prior
to taking public office. Blog url:
<a href="http://manfined1500forlookingforajob.blogspot.com/2015/06/june-30-2015-update-government.html">-</a>--------------------</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<i>The Washington State
Constitution establishes the U.S. Constitution as the Supreme Law of
the Land and also requires Washington State government employees to
“protect and maintain individual rights.” </i>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<i>Hanging a truthful flier on a
private bulletin board is protected under the First Amendment to our
Bill of Rights. <br /> The right to a speedy trial by jury is
protected under our Sixth and Seventh Amendments to our Bill of
Rights. </i><br />
<br />
Please help me educate government
employees to their good neighborly civic duty to uphold our state and
federal constitutions by resolving the issues, and ending the
continuing harassment by Washington state government employees, cited
in my COMPLAINT <u>according to our Supreme Law of the Land.</u>
Resolution is easy and simple, however, intellectual dishonesty has
prevailed in almost 4 years of defending myself through the APPEAL
process. <br />
Please give prompt attention to my efforts. I look
forward to hearing from you about correcting the overreach of
Washington Department of Labor and Industries. <br />
<br />
Sincerely
thank you,
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Enclosures: </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Does Bob Ferguson have the integrity, the self respect, and the courage to do the right thing according to our Supreme Law of the Land? </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
We shall see! I hope these government employees are learning a lot about the simple truth here...<br />
<br />
----The COMPLAINT can be read in my March 26, 2015, UPDATE.---- </div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-69838864422897975192015-06-30T09:14:00.001-07:002015-06-30T20:02:57.925-07:00June 30, 2015, UPDATE: Government employees digging their hole deeper... According to the signature date on the following "WARRANT," Jeff Martin, Revenue Agent, filed paperwork with the Clerk of the Court of Spokane County for warrant to collect the $1000.00 "unregistered contractor" fine before he received my letter. Perhaps that was the reason for his phone call, to let me know what their next move was.<br />
I do not know what Jeff's reaction was to my letter which is in the previous June 17, 2015, UPDATE, as I have not contacted him, nor has he contacted me, except to mail me more paperwork from the court, this WARRANT:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLgFr8jxvUw4P0KXDwEpbpu4RpFINTWnnMeHKtY8-B6-kOtr7KyiJR7wLKtiW0KI6mHmfEenQx9lfO523mxnhd7mHjOeePwhs1ZNMahX4nqKOmmit0ygWubV40YpC9xu_vYw4aThFRXEI/s1600/warrant+pg1.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLgFr8jxvUw4P0KXDwEpbpu4RpFINTWnnMeHKtY8-B6-kOtr7KyiJR7wLKtiW0KI6mHmfEenQx9lfO523mxnhd7mHjOeePwhs1ZNMahX4nqKOmmit0ygWubV40YpC9xu_vYw4aThFRXEI/s320/warrant+pg1.jpeg" width="232" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinFlcP0ZyYUv6PliuThUgONKmwPPPCJVfOXtrD4z93S_k-lKOcLX2wlCHiobLoGSIRof5pXrWA4H1zKc8qD-zTuy4KXJsm5rhNa8yi2oTqyeXXM0VGNCyAIn8fQVShyphenhyphen8oiF5fFLw2ptJo/s1600/warrant+pg2.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinFlcP0ZyYUv6PliuThUgONKmwPPPCJVfOXtrD4z93S_k-lKOcLX2wlCHiobLoGSIRof5pXrWA4H1zKc8qD-zTuy4KXJsm5rhNa8yi2oTqyeXXM0VGNCyAIn8fQVShyphenhyphen8oiF5fFLw2ptJo/s320/warrant+pg2.jpeg" width="232" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
You would think that an issue over hanging a truthful flier on a bulletin board could be resolved in one face to face encounter between me and the guy complaining about my flyer. However, dealing with government employees is the same as dealing with mechanical robots. They do not hear, they do not reason, and they are not good neighbors. The government does not love you.<br />
So, what am I supposed to do with this WARRANT? I guess I just stick it in the files with the rest of their nonsensical paperwork. Fools! They remind me of kindergarten children playing "I'm the boss" games. Seriously! These people expect me to play their unconstitutional games with them as if they are the gods of the planet. And they have nothing but time and money from the government coffers to never end their assault. Me thinks this is not how our government was intended to work. It is certainly not intended for government employees to ignore our state and federal constitutions. That is plain and simple and that is all that should be needed to back them off. But, no. I am simply dealing with fools "just doing their job" from top to bottom. Not one of them would willingly stand before a jury of good neighbors and do what they are doing. They do what they do from their desk, form their office, and they won't talk to me in a language that acknowledges our Supreme Law of the Land. I cannot force them to be civilized responsible neighbors. We are at an impasse still. As long as they desire to consider me a bad guy, or a scofflaw, to justify their never-ending assault they will do what they are doing. No one will hold them accountable to our Supreme Law of the Land. I will not play their game by their unconstitutional rules. That is final.<br />
Bureaucrats acting as lawmakers, law enforcers, and "judge and jury" is wholly unconstitutional. It is wholly tyrannical. It is not how this nation was intended to operate. Our founders of this great nation experienced the same things I am experiencing. Ben Franklin wrote of it in his satire <i>Rules by which a Great Empire May be Reduced to a Small One</i>, 11 September 1773. Here are some excerpts: </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">VII. When such Governors have crammed their Coffers, and made themselves so odious to the People that they can no longer remain among them with Safety to their Persons, recall and </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">reward </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">them with Pensions. You may make them </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">Baronets</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;"> too,</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;"> if that respectable Order should not think fit to resent it. All will contribute to encourage new Governors in the same Practices, and make the supreme Government </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">detestable</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">.</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Are not all government employees secure in their positions and pensions? Government employees "just do their job" according to the Psalm 2 crowd at the top who direct their unconscionable duties and conduct their performance reviews. Every duty and decision is designed to insure that government is always right and always worthy of unquestionable obedience, never mind the Supreme Law of the Land. --And there lies the solution to out of control government employees. Simply make them abide by our state and federal constitutions. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">X. </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">Possibly indeed some of them might still comfort themselves, and say, “Though we have no Property, we have yet </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">something</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;"> left that is valuable; we have constitutional </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">Liberty</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;"> both </span><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" id="BNFN-01-20-02-pb-0395" style="background-color: white; color: #004071; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;"></a><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">of Person and of Conscience.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">..</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">... To annihilate this Comfort, begin by Laws to perplex their Commerce with infinite Regulations impossible to be remembered and observed; ordain Seizures of their Property for every Failure; take away the Trial of such Property by Jury, and give it to arbitrary Judges of your own appointing, and of the lowest Characters in the Country, whose Salaries and Emoluments are to arise out of the Duties or Condemnations, and whose Appointments are </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">during Pleasure</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">. Then let there be a formal Declaration of both Houses, that Opposition to your Edicts is </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">Treason</span><span style="background-color: white; text-indent: 19.5px;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px;">, and that Persons suspected of Treason in the Provinces may, according to some obsolete Law, be seized and sent to the Metropolis of the Empire for Trial; and pass an Act that those there charged with certain other Offences shall be sent away in Chains from their Friends and Country to be tried in the same Manner for Felony. Then erect a new Court of Inquisition among them, accompanied by an armed Force, with Instructions to transport all such suspected Persons, to be ruined by the Expense if they bring over Evidences to prove their Innocence, or be found guilty and hanged if they can’t afford it. And lest the People should think you cannot possibly go any farther, pass another solemn declaratory Act, that “King, Lords, and Commons had, hath, and of Right ought to have, full Power and Authority to make Statutes of sufficient Force and Validity to bind the unrepresented Provinces </span></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-variant: small-caps; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px; text-transform: lowercase;">in all cases whatsoever</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">.” This will include </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">Spiritual</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;"> with temporal; and taken together, must operate wonderfully to your Purpose, by convincing them, that they are at present under a Power something like that spoken of in the Scriptures, which can not only </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">kill their Bodies</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">, but </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">damn their Souls</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;"> to all Eternity, by compelling them, if it pleases, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">to worship the Devil</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19.5px; text-indent: 19.5px;">.</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Here we have the exact thing I am experiencing, "perplex their commerce with infinite regulations impossible to be remembered and observed." Isn't this true today? And then "ordain seizures of their property for every failure." Isn't the above WARRANT seizing my property just as in Franklin's day? "Take away trial of such Property by jury and give it to arbitrary Judges of your own appointing." Doesn't this hit home with my experiences, too? LOL! Man, this is funny. Administrative Law Judges are just another government employee trying to convince me I owe the government $1500.00 for hanging a truthful flier on a private bulletin board.! These idiots employed by the government have no idea of their own idiocy! No concept whatsoever of our nation's history and the principles upon which our state and federal constitutions were written. They have no idea of a "public servant" and they have made themselves "public masters." Neighborly interaction between the people and government on a basis of common sense and common decency has become non-existent. In fact, every interaction has become adversarial from the courtrooms down to the Departments, WDLI and DMV especially noted. </div>
<div>
Question: Why aren't our government employees, law makers, lawyers, and judges aware of the writings of our founding fathers? For me to attempt to communicate "founding principles" with people who are oblivious and ignorant while they seek <u>first</u> to protect the positions they hold in government is obviously an effort in futility. That is why the objective of this blog is to educate them and the public whom they are sworn to serve under the constraints of our state and federal constitutions. </div>
<div>
Notice that I should not be required to do this. I should be able to take comfort in our state and federal constitutions and in the government employees who swear an Oath of Office to support those constitutions. <br />
This blog is clear and complete proof that government employees are the problem. We the People are not the problem! <br />
Let it be said here that there has been a deliberate effort of the Psalm 2 crowd to gain positions of authority and influence in all the institutions that created and maintained this once great nation. The Psalm 2 crowd has successfully taken over government, education, media, banking, and commerce. They have done this successfully since 1913 when the power to print America's money was given to international banking interests. The banking and corporate interests have published their designs and intentions to bring the Earth under their rule in the form of their "New World Order." And they have exploited the ignorance of government employee minions like Jeff Martin, Revenue Agent, and also the ignorance of our elected representatives. If in failing to gain cooperation by ignorance and deceit, they moneyed powers have bought and paid for government employees and representatives who will carry out their agenda of managed economy, commerce, and travel. Liberty and unalienable rights GONE!</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<img height="222" src="https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xft1/v/t1.0-9/11403497_10155704668015246_5314790369752421654_n.jpg?oh=677e0bb148fd7f9b5a328b9797c28314&oe=56129035" width="400" /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I pray that our neighbors employed by the government will soon come to their senses and do their good neighborly civic duty to support and defend our Supreme Law of the Land, for ourselves and our posterity. Idiots governing idiots doesn't work, just as Daniel Webster said...</div>
<div>
Wake up people! Get ahold of your family and friends who are employed by the government and educate them in the simple truth. Teach your children the simple truth... lest they be taught to worship their government masters. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-68366719192889176672015-06-17T14:31:00.000-07:002015-06-17T14:43:09.531-07:00June 17, 2015 UPDATE: Got an unexpected phone call from WDLI Jeff Martin from the Spokane office of Washington Department of Labor and Industries gave me an unexpected call yesterday morning. He started off by pointing out that he promised me that he would call me when my case was given back to him, or when he found out what the next course of actions WDLI would take. Then he said something that made me laugh right into the phone. Then he tried to get me to agree with the silly justifications WDLI uses to rationalize issue $1000.00 citations to people who hang fliers on bulletin boards. Man, I was rolling in laughter at the nonsense. I was having a good time defending our Supreme Law of the Land, until finally Jeff lost his marbles. He tried to accuse me of putting words in his mouth as an excuse to end the call. I had told him to come get me and put me in jail. If I am a bad neighbor come get me and put me in jail. I don't even think he got out his main reason for calling me. I guess I hurt his feelings, or perhaps our Supreme Law of the Land hurt his feelings. ...they know what they are doing is wrong... good grief!<br />
I had to follow up the call with a written letter. Perhaps it will put gonads between his legs. He needs the courage to do the right thing and stand up to the nonsense foisted on him by is supervisors up the chain of command. Here is the letter:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
June 17, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: Jeff Martin, Revenue Agent</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Dept. of Labor and Industries</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
901 N Monroe Street, Suite 100</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Spokane, WA 99201-2149</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds, good neighbor</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
*********Lane</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
****WA 9****</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
*** *** ****</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
SUBJECT: Follow up on June 16 phone
conversation</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Dear Jeff Martin,</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I want to thank you for the
unexpected phone conversation we had yesterday morning. I love it
when good neighbors can get together to talk honestly and frankly.
However, there does arise a problem in every frank and honest
conversation/disagreement. One party to the
conversation/disagreement has to be right and correct on the issue
being discussed and debated, and that simply leads to the other party
being wrong and incorrect. Unfortunately for you, I am right based on
the history of this great nation and based on our Supreme Law of the
Land. You and the rest of the Washington state government employees
involved in my case are wrong and standing on sinking sand. I have
been disappointed and fascinated by my inability to find one
government employee willing to be a good neighbor who does their
civic duty to support and defend our Supreme Law of the Land.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I am writing to provide you with a
hard copy of the reasons I am right and correct so that you may find
the courage to stand with me and pass this letter up your chain of
command. First, let me drag some honesty out of you by pointing out
that YOU DO KNOW that government has been expanding outside the
limits of its constitutional restraints for many decades--while
educated people like myself have been helplessly watching growth of
government boom out of control by trampling the very unalienable
rights which are protected in our state and federal constitutions.
You may seek to justify this expansion and trampling in any way you
choose to delude yourself, but that does not mean that I must join
you in your delusions. As you can surely see, I have not been
convinced by dozens of government employees to join in their
disregard of our Supreme Law of the Land, and you must know how
disappointed I am in those government employees who have gone so far
as to disregard their own Oath of Office and Oath of Attorney. Truly,
government employees ought to be ashamed to trample on the life,
limb, and treasure of those who have given all to “defending our
U.S. Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic” for our
posterity, yours included. Also note that I have been quite amused at
the rationalizations containing twisted word definitions, and the
false justifications put forth by government employees to assuage
their conscience while they obliterate the very documents which
govern the conduct of government employees. (Example: Inferring that
“advertising,” posting a flier on a bulletin board, is not
constitutionally protected free speech is ludicrous. Thinking that
you can convince me to fall in line with that nonsense is delusional. Deluding yourself with twisted rationalizations and false
justifications to go along with your supervisors in order to continue
“just doing your job” to collect a paycheck is shameful. Too many
men and women of weak character have sought the security of
government employment throughout history, and that has led the
individuals of weak character to commit crimes while “just
following orders.” Note the Nuremberg trials following WWII) You
ought to be smarter than that.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
For you and your supervisors up the
chain of command, I stand on solid ground here:</div>
<ol>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The Washington State Constitution,
Article 1 SECTION 1 states: <i>All political power is inherent in
the people, and governments derive their just powers from the
consent of the governed, </i><i><u>and are established to protect
and maintain individual rights</u></i><i>.</i> Fining your good
neighbor $1500.00 for hanging a flier on a private bulletin board is
definitely not “protecting and maintaining individual rights.”
Preventing your good neighbor from participating in the free
exchange of goods and services is not “protecting and maintaining
individual rights.”</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The Washington State Constitution,
Article I SECTION 2 states: <i>The Constitution of the </i><i>United States
is the supreme law of the land.</i> The U.S. Constitution contains a
Bill of Rights which protect the rights of the individual people of
the nation. Free speech is protected in Article I of the Bill of
Rights. The right to a speedy trial by jury is protected in Article
VI and VII of the Bill of Rights. Depriving your good neighbor of
liberty and property without due process of law(obtaining a
conviction from a jury of good neighbors) is strictly prohibited
under Article V of the Bill of Rights. --WDLI has violated Article
I, V, VI, VII of our Bill of rights. In a nation that seeks to
uphold the “rule of law,” it is ludicrous to ignore and
disregard the Supreme Law of the Land. Ignorance of the Supreme Law
of the Land is no excuse for government employees, either. After
almost 4 years of arguing with government employees I am forced to
conclude that some kind of mental illness or insanity has crept into
the current crop of government employees. This letter is another one
of my attempts to correct that.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The People of the great state of
Washington elected representatives to the Federal Government in
order to maintain our constitutional republic and to uphold and
protect our Supreme Law of the Land, thus defending the liberties
and rights which are expressly protected in our state and federal
constitutions. Our representatives in Congress found it necessary to
codify and provide penalties for crimes such as depriving
individuals of their constitutionally protected liberties and
rights. They provided “teeth” to the constitution. U.S. Code
Chapter18 Section 242 states: <span style="font-family: inherit;"><i><span style="color: black;"><u>Whoever,
under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom,
willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution
or laws of the United States</u></span><span style="color: black;">,
or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such
person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are
prescribed for the punishment of citizens, </span><span style="color: black;"><u>shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or
both;</u></span><span style="color: black;">
and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of
this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of
this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this
title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or
may be sentenced to death.</span>
</i>Are
Washington state government employees attempting to bully me into
believing that I am a bad neighbor who owes the government employees
$1500.00 for hanging a flier on a bulletin board unaware of 18 USC
242?
</span></div>
</li>
</ol>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> Jeff
Martin, based on the above foundations, and on logical common sense
and common decency, I have clearly won the argument over WDLI
employees unlawfully fining your good neighbor $1500.00 for posting a
flier on a bulletin board. However, it appears that our Washington
state government employees need to find the joy of upholding our
Supreme Laws of the Land, rather than insanely obliterating them. Our
predecessors found the joy of writing and defending our Supreme Law
of the Land for their posterity, but this long drawn out argument
with WDLI has made it clear to me that government employees are being
misled and misguided into perverting our state and federal
constitutions. And, I can find no one in Washington State government
who is standing on their Oath of Office to correct the problem.
However, I did find some hope in this ruling by a federal judge:
</span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>Judge
Rules Administrative Court System Illegal After 81 Years
</b></span></span></span><a href="http://armstrongeconomics.com/archives/33280">http://armstrongeconomics.com/archives/33280</a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br /> Perhaps the state of Washington ought to bring its Administrative
Law into compliance with our state and federal constitutions.
Administrative Law applies only to the administration of a program
which only includes the individuals who have signed up to participate
in the program and agreed to be under the administrative law
governing the program. Administrative Law does not apply to the
general public who are not participating in the government program
and have not agreed to be governed under Administrative Law. </span></span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"> </span><span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"> <span style="font-family: inherit;">Once
again, it is obvious to both you and I that government has expanded
beyond the constraints of our Supreme Law of the Land over the last 6
decades, or more. Once again, I have communicated simply and clearly
at a sixth grade level. I was taught in sixth grade that good
neighbors do their civic duty to uphold our Supreme Law of the Land.
I hope you have the comprehension skills and honesty of a sixth
grader. Sixth graders also know what an Oath of Office means, and
even they wouldn't delude themselves into breaking their Oath of
Office in order to assault the sensibilities, threaten, bully, and
fine a good neighbor. <br /> If perhaps, our phone conversation ended
before you got to mention the reason for your call, please call
again, or write to my address at the head of this letter. I will be
happy to assist in any way I can. Also, don't forget that you can
update yourself concerning this argument and my efforts to correct
government employee errors on my blog, Man Fined $1500.00 for Looking
for Job.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: inherit;">http://manfined1500forlookingforajob.blogspot.com/2015/03/march-26-2015-update-signed-complaint.html</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: inherit;"><br />With
all sincerity, <br /><br /><br /><br />Russ Hinds</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br />
</span><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="color: black;">“We
the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts,
not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who
pervert the Constitution.”</span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>ABRAHAM
LINCOLN<br /><br /> </b>There you have it. I am still looking for government employees who desire to be good neighbors who do their civic duty to uphold our Supreme Law of the Land. Crazy! Aren't they? I actually enjoy respecting the life, limb, and treasure given to preserve the rights and liberties that are protected in our state and federal constitutions for our posterity. Why can't government employees find that joy? They need an epiphany!</span></span></span></div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-40964079196909897332015-06-03T10:48:00.000-07:002015-06-04T19:47:42.845-07:00June 3, 2015, UPDATE: Responses from Federal Representatives. Only 2 of my U.S. Representatives responded to my request for assistance. Senator Patty Murray declined to help by pointing out that it is illegal for the legislative branch of government to hold the judicial branch of government accountable to their Oath of Office.<br />
Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers declined to help because my issue is a state issue and she stated that I need to contact my state representatives.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgki-bPXbP0xF8LLUW-CpjDrIY86Y0msh8bEReSD6xBHWFergPS7VH_wK7MtSTSI4A1ultd97vyE1RV-9QWqUFr1KVh0PkoJTybRUa8HPSeNHQznY9N1CpjFP8A1fy7fDIQaLttLl_GQek/s1600/Sen.+Patty+Murray.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgki-bPXbP0xF8LLUW-CpjDrIY86Y0msh8bEReSD6xBHWFergPS7VH_wK7MtSTSI4A1ultd97vyE1RV-9QWqUFr1KVh0PkoJTybRUa8HPSeNHQznY9N1CpjFP8A1fy7fDIQaLttLl_GQek/s320/Sen.+Patty+Murray.jpeg" width="232" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHw1mvN9dZktn1J-5CsvBr1w8sUh2qll9zhSqMhaYPamwZkAKoCOWyOfqTS0IqoNpxfAXC4f-W036ZC3NIDdz5WhxsPE-HeXzR7jGeCGMrulxEmyK6Hm8miWirv9__CL_U3Y-pJYwxi9c/s1600/Rep+Cathy+McMorris+Rodgers.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHw1mvN9dZktn1J-5CsvBr1w8sUh2qll9zhSqMhaYPamwZkAKoCOWyOfqTS0IqoNpxfAXC4f-W036ZC3NIDdz5WhxsPE-HeXzR7jGeCGMrulxEmyK6Hm8miWirv9__CL_U3Y-pJYwxi9c/s320/Rep+Cathy+McMorris+Rodgers.jpeg" width="232" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
There is little more I can say. Obviously, these people do not want to do their job correctly. Therefore, they find ways that permit themselves to justify ignoring their Oath of Office. Cathy wants me to contact my state legislatures, which the info I sent her clearly states that I have already exhausted all state remedies. Patty says that she cannot hold other government employees accountable to their Oath of Office. George Washington would disagree with her. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Both of them fail to take into account 18 USC 242 and 241. Are they simply ignorant of the U.S Code? Or are they living in la-la land while pretending that it is not their civic duty to confront unlawful government employees?</div>
I think they are both caught up in the web of nonsense. I really believe that they have no idea what they are doing. I think they are being led around by the ring in their nose. I think they are incapable of reasoning on the foundations our country was founded upon. I think you could put any high school sophomore in their seats in congress and there would be little change. The masters of deception and manipulation have the ring in their nose. The freedom and the rights protected in our Supreme Law of the Land are gone. Government employees are now our masters. They will tax, and fee, and fine at will.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Pretty sad... Apparently, the American peoples' government representatives will not wake up without a shaking of the earth catastrophe, or an attempt to place 90% of the population into prison. Only a few individuals like me in America will stand behind the principles of our Supreme Law of the Land. The majority of Americans will not wake up until they are the ones placed in the bullseye of the government employees.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #383838; font-family: 'Mercury SSm A', 'Mercury SSm B', Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 2em; padding: 0px;">
<i style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—<br style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" />Because I was not a Socialist.</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #383838; font-family: 'Mercury SSm A', 'Mercury SSm B', Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 2em; padding: 0px;">
<i style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—</i><br />
<i style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Because I was not a Trade Unionist.</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #383838; font-family: 'Mercury SSm A', 'Mercury SSm B', Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 2em; padding: 0px;">
<i style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—</i><br />
<i style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Because I was not a Jew.</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #383838; font-family: 'Mercury SSm A', 'Mercury SSm B', Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 2em; padding: 0px;">
<i style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.</i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #383838; font-family: 'Mercury SSm A', 'Mercury SSm B', Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 2em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="line-height: 1; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><b>Martin Niemoller speaking of Hitler's NAZIs. </b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
God help us. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
No one can say to me that I did not do all that I could do... That is the fact, Jack! </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-20704046265025528622015-05-13T07:16:00.001-07:002015-05-17T22:28:56.372-07:00May 13, 2015, UPDATE: Correspondence with my Federal Representatives. <b>EDIT</b>: After stepping away, and then rereading this UPDATE, I can see my frustration growing as this nonsense continues on to 4 years...Oh wow! I guess I lost a week there! Looked at the calendar wrong and wrote the dates one week ahead of time. Oh well... Probably won't make much of a difference with government employees and other who lack the heart to care about important things and frivolous things.<br />
<br />
After giving U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby over 30 days to respond to my COMPLAINT and let me know what action he is planning, I have heard absolutely nothing. It won't do any good to call his office again because he won't return my phone calls. What is the matter, Ormsby? Are my COMPLAINT and the attached STATEMENT OF THE ESSENTIAL FACTS too simple and thorough for you? Are you afraid to do your job and confront your fellow government employees? This is serious business, Ormsby. Men have fought and died to preserve the rights and liberties which are protected in our Supreme Law of the Land for their posterity. Ignorance of the Supreme Laws of the Land is no excuse for government employees who wish to abide by the "rule of law." What is that, you say? You say, "The 'rule of law' only applies when government employees use that phrase against the citizens?" Do you mean that government employees are above the law? Do you mean that government employees are never wrong in their use of "the law." Hmmm... I think you are a coward. One of the worst of cowards. You are a guy who wants to live the life of Riley on the backs of the taxpayers and not get involved in any controversy; especially, any controversy dealing with ignorant out of control government employees. You want guys like me to go away and not bother you by pointing out your job description and the folly of out of control government employees.<br />
This blog and my exposure of government employees being inept and cowardly could have been avoided at the beginning, and the issue of the $1500.00 citations for hanging an innocent flier on a bulletin board could have been dealt with properly in the beginning by simply giving me my speedy trial by a jury of my good neighbors. The issue of the fines could have been resolved in 3 to 6 weeks had they allowed me due process of law and my right to a jury trial. BUT, ..BUT... <u>the government employees did not want to risk a jury nullifying their misapplication of law</u>. They knew that they would probably lose a jury trial simply because of the outrageous amount of the fines for hanging a truthful flier on a bulletin board. Because they knew that, they elected to put me through their long, drawn out, and costly appeals process while attempting to deceive me and pull the wool over my eyes.<br />
<div>
All of the players involved know that I am saying the simple truth. I saw it in their eyes. The Assistant Attorney General Angela Zurlini knows it. I saw it in her eyes and demeanor. She knew she was railroading me... Superior Court judges Sypolt and Moreno knows it. They put on a show for me, and sided with the government employees to cover their asses, all the while putting up roadblocks and obstacles in order to discourage me and stop me protesting the fines. They knew what they were doing because they themselves would not put up with the same things happening to them.<br />
Now, U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby does not want to call the government employees to the carpet. He just wants to pretend that my COMPLAINT doesn't exist and never reached his desk. I have the return receipts proving that his office has received my COMPLAINT, but Ormsby chooses to ignore it and ignore my phone calls. Pathetic!</div>
<div>
Well... Perhaps my federal representatives can get a response from Ormsby. I sent a letter and a copy of my COMPLAINT to Senator Patty Murray, who actually got Ormsby his job by recommending to Obama that Obama nominate him for the position. Hmmm... were there favors exchanged? Perhaps not, but corruption in government is rampant. So is outrageous nonsense rampant! I also sent the same letter and copy of the COMPLAINT to Senator Maria Cantwell and Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers.<br />
Here is the letter I sent to my federal representatives: [the Complaint can be read in my March 26, 2015, UPDATE] </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
May 19, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: Representative Cathy McMorris
Rodgers</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
10 North Post Street, Suite 625</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Spokane, WA 99201</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509)353-2374</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
************</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
*************</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509)2********</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
SUBJECT: Enclosed official COMPLAINT
to U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Representative McMorris Rodgers,</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I am contacting your office
because I have waited over a month for a response from U.S. Attorney
Mike Ormsby regarding the COMPLAINT that I sent to his office on
April 10, 2015. After numerous phone calls to Ormsby's office, I have
not been given the courtesy of a call back. Is my simple and fully
documented COMPLAINT too scary for him and his office because it
requires upholding our United States Code and our Supreme Laws of the
Land? Or, is there some other reason why U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby
will not communicate with me? <br />
Public servants who ignore
their good neighbors is a dereliction of duty in their office of
public trust. If Ormsby's office will not communicate with me, I
cannot even find out “why” he won't communicate with me. <br />
The issues addressed in my COMPLAINT stem from 2 Washington Dept. of
Labor and Industries citations containing $1500.00 in fines for
hanging a flier on a private bulletin board, and my being denied a
speedy trial by a jury of my good neighbors before my liberties and
property can be confiscated by government employees. Being bullied by
a gaggle of government employees attempting to convince me that I am
a bad neighbor who deserves to pay the government employees $1500.00
for hanging a simple flier on a bulletin board is not “due process
of law.”<br />
I have attempted to patiently resolve the issues
concerning the WDLI citations for over 3 years, and I have exhausted
all the methods provided by the state agencies for resolving the
fines <u>properly and according to the “rule of law”</u> -that is
the rule of the Supreme Law of the Land, our state and federal
constitutions. In my efforts to properly educate government
employees, I have now arrived at U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby's office
to ask that our U.S. Code 18 USC 242 and 241 be enforced just as it
is his responsibility and duty to enforce the U.S. Code according to
his job description. I say again, U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby's office
is ignoring me. <br />
Could you please contact U.S. Attorney Mike
Ormsby's office and inquire as to why I have not had my
correspondence and phone calls answered? Perhaps the U.S. Attorney
will respect your inquiry, and then you could inform me of his
reasons for ignoring me. Kind of a silly round-about way of
communicating, but perhaps necessary while dealing with government
employees who are afraid of the present day controversy surrounding
upholding our constitutionally protected rights and liberties, and
out of control government.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The enclosed COMPLAINT should bring
you up to speed in this case. <br />
<br />
Thank You,
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Russ Hinds enclosures</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I am very serious about this case and this blog, not because of the $1500.00 fines, but because I want a return to common sense, common decency, and constitutional government. At the present time, government is causing the destruction of civility and dividing neighbor against neighbor. I would encourage my readers to contact the offices of Senator Patty Murray, Senator Maria Cantwell, and Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers and ask that they not ignore my letter and the COMPLAINT. Send a note via fax machine, that way they have a hard copy. --I sent my letter and complaint to the local Spokane Offices<br />
<br />
Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers:<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />10 North Post Street, Suite 625<br />Spokane, WA 99201<br />Phone: 509-353-2374<br />Fax: 509-353-2412<br /><br />203 Cannon House Office Building <br />Washington, D.C. 20515<br />Phone: 202-225-2006<br />Fax: 202-225-3392</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
Senator Maria Cantwell:</div>
<br />
<div>
U.S. Courthouse, # 697<br />
West 920 Riverside<br />
Spokane, WA 99201 <br />
Voice: 509-353-2507 <br />
FAX: 509-353-2547<br />
<br />
511 Hart Senate Office Building<br />
Washington, D.C. 20510-4705<br />
DC Phone: 202-224-3441<br />
DC Fax: 202-228-0514<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div>
Senator Patty Murray:</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">10 North Post Street, Suite 600<br />Spokane, Washington 99201<br />Phone: (509) 624-9515<br />Fax: (509) 624-9561</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">154 Russell Senate Office Building<br />Washington, D.C. 20510<br />Phone: (202) 224-2621<br />Fax: (202) 224-0238<br />Toll Free: (866) 481-9186</span><br />
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I sincerely appreciate any reader who will contact the above and encourage them to respond to me with honest answers. I am tending to think that the above may choose to ignore me just like Ormsby has ignored me. You and I are getting a pretty good education on how government employees REALLY work! Perhaps we can help them find the joy of upholding and defending out Supreme Law of the Land. That would be the epiphany that they need.<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-71384768705672018282015-04-18T10:07:00.001-07:002015-04-18T21:49:51.474-07:00April 18, 2015, UPDATE: No progress... So, after I received the return receipt for my COMPLAINT mailed to US Attorney Mike Ormsby, I made a follow up call to his office. I opened this call with a question, "How do I get a complaint sworn into the record so that an investigation can be started?"<br />
"We don't take complaints from individuals. You need to contact an agency. We only take complaints from agencies."<br />
"Well, what agency do I need to contact?"<br />
"The FBI."<br />
Hmmm... seems I went through this before. Like last month. So, I look up the phone number for the local FBI office. I call it, and that number takes me to some idiot in or near Washington DC. After explaining the nature of my complaint based on 18 USC 242 and 241, the guy says that I had already called on this back on March 12. He says I need to get an attorney and deal with it at the local level.<br />
Do you believe this? I didn't want to believe it. However, rather than government employees upholding our Supreme Law of the Land, I am diverted and ignored. I am simply not permitted to submit my COMPLAINT to the appropriate authorities who are supposed to be upholding the "rule of law," the Supreme Law of the Land. These guys just cut me off at the pass and refuse to respond to my COMPLAINT with a simple letter explaining what I need to do. They put up a stone wall. These guys are not good neighbors who do their civic duty to uphold our Supreme Laws of the Land. How do they do that? I could not do that. I am guilty of assuming that my government employees are of the same mind I am. After all, I pay my taxes for their salaries to serve We the People.<br />
It is gone! The delusion of trustworthy government employees is completely gone. I can no longer give the benefit of the doubt to any government employee hoping that they have a conscience that leans toward doing their Civic Duty to uphold our state and federal constitutions. It is as if I am up against a completely corrupt criminal machine. Every door to justice and liberty is blocked. They have blocked all the doors in order to never admit that government employees are wrong and make mistakes. It is obvious that government employees are going to do what they are going to do, regardless of our state and federal constitutions.<br />
The only way to change this is for the public to become informed and demand change back to our Supreme Laws of the Land. And, it has always been the purpose of this blog to inform the public. I won the argument fully. I won the argument clearly and simply on this blog. They know it, and that is why they won't talk to me. They are afraid. They are the worst kind of vindictive cowards as demonstrated by them hiring a collection agency to come after me. From the beginning, they would not approach me face to face, and now they hide.<br />
When I informed the collection agency of my dispute, they investigated by inquiring of WDLI. WDLI provided some information to the collection agency and the collection agency forwarded a copy to me. WDLI makes this statement in writing to the collection agency, "We have been instructed not to respond to him any longer unless he has an actual question." The government employees are told not to talk to me! How crazy is that? Unbelievable!<br />
What world do these people live in? Questions about our Supreme Laws of the Land are not "actual questions?" It is a pretty sick world we are living in... mindless people... unthinking people... unloving and uncaring people... <br />
<br />
Well, it has been quite an education for me! I have no more illusions about the state of our nation and states. Pretty sad... shame, shame, shame on government employees! Oh... and remember that I mentioned early on in this blog that we need legislation requiring every government employee to go through training on the constitution and the history of this nation? Yep! They need that, but they need to be taught how to be good neighbors, too. Can't be a good neighbor living in a world of lies, denial, and nonsense!<br />
<br />
<div class="vk_ans" style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: xx-large !important; font-weight: lighter !important; margin-bottom: 0px;">
<span data-dobid="hdw">id·i·ot</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: small;">
<div class="lr_dct_ent_ph" style="font-size: large;">
<span class="lr_dct_ph">ˈidēət/</span><span class="lr_dct_spkr lr_dct_spkr_off" data-log-string="pronunciation-icon-click" jsaction="dob.p" style="display: inline-block; height: 16px; margin: 0px 2px 4px 5px; opacity: 0.55; vertical-align: middle; width: 16px;" title="Listen"><input height="14" src="" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: small;" type="image" width="14" /></span></div>
<div>
<div class="lr_dct_sf_h" style="padding-top: 10px;">
<i>noun</i><br />
<div style="display: inline-block;">
<span class="lr_dct_lbl_inl vk_gy" style="color: rgb(135, 135, 135) !important; font-style: italic; margin-left: 6px;">informal</span></div>
</div>
<div class="xpdxpnd vk_gy" data-mh="-1" style="-webkit-transition: max-height 0.3s; color: rgb(135, 135, 135) !important; max-height: 0px; overflow: hidden; transition: max-height 0.3s;">
<b></b><b></b></div>
<ol class="lr_dct_sf_sens" style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 20px;">
<li style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.2; list-style: none; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><div class="lr_dct_sf_sen vk_txt" style="font-weight: lighter !important; padding-top: 10px;">
<div style="margin-left: 20px;">
<div class="_Jig" style="margin-left: -20px;">
<div data-dobid="dfn" style="display: inline;">
a stupid person.</div>
<div>
<table class="vk_tbl vk_gy" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(135, 135, 135) !important;"><tbody>
<tr><td class="lr_dct_nyms_ttl" style="font-style: italic; padding: 0px 3px 0px 0px; vertical-align: top; white-space: nowrap;">synonyms:</td><td style="padding: 0px;"><a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+fool&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CB8Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">fool</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+ass&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCAQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">ass</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+halfwit&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCEQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">halfwit</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dunce&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCIQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dunce</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dolt&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCMQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dolt</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+ignoramus&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCQQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">ignoramus</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+cretin&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCUQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">cretin</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+moron&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCYQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">moron</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+imbecile&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCcQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">imbecile</a>,<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+simpleton&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCgQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">simpleton</a>; <span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m"></span><br />
<div style="display: inline;">
<div style="display: inline;">
<div class="lr_dct_more_txt xpdxpnd xpdnoxpnd" data-mh="-1" style="-webkit-transition: max-height 0.3s; display: inline; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; transition: max-height 0.3s;">
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m"><i style="padding-right: 4px;">informal</i><a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dope&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCoQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dope</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+ninny&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCsQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">ninny</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+nincompoop&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CCwQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">nincompoop</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+chump&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CC0Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">chump</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dimwit&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CC4Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dimwit</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dumbo&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CC8Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dumbo</a>,<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dummy&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDAQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dummy</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dum-dum&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDEQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dum-dum</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+loon&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDIQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">loon</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dork&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDMQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dork</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+sap&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDQQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">sap</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+jackass&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDUQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">jackass</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+blockhead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDYQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">blockhead</a>, jughead,<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+bonehead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDcQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">bonehead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+knucklehead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDgQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">knucklehead</a>, </span><br />
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m"><a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+fathead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDkQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">fathead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+butthead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDoQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">butthead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+numbskull&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDsQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">numbskull</a>, numbnuts, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dumb-ass&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CDwQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dumb-ass</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+doofus&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CD0Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">doofus</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+clod&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CD4Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">clod</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dunderhead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CD8Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dunderhead</a>,</span><br />
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m"> <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+ditz&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEAQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">ditz</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+lummox&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEEQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">lummox</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+knuckle-dragger&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEIQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">knuckle-dragger</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dipstick&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEMQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dipstick</a>,<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+thickhead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEQQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">thickhead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+meathead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEUQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">meathead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+meatball&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEYQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">meatball</a>, </span><br />
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m"><a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+wooden-head&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEcQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">wooden-head</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+airhead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEgQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">airhead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+pinhead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEkQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">pinhead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+lamer&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEoQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">lamer</a>,<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+lamebrain&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEsQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">lamebrain</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+peabrain&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CEwQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">peabrain</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+birdbrain&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CE0Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">birdbrain</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+mouth-breather&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CE4Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">mouth-breather</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+scissorbill&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CE8Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">scissorbill</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+jerk&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFAQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">jerk</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+nerd&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFEQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">nerd</a>,<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+donkey&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFIQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">donkey</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+nitwit&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFMQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">nitwit</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+twit&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFQQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">twit</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+boob&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFUQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">boob</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+twerp&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFYQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">twerp</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+hoser&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFcQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">hoser</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+schmuck&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFgQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">schmuck</a>,</span><br />
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m"> <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+bozo&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFkQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">bozo</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+turkey&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFoQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">turkey</a>,<a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+chowderhead&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFsQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">chowderhead</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+dingbat&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CFwQ_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">dingbat</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+mook&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CF0Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">mook</a>; </span></div>
<div class="lr_dct_more_txt xpdxpnd xpdnoxpnd" data-mh="-1" style="-webkit-transition: max-height 0.3s; display: inline; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; transition: max-height 0.3s;">
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m"><i style="padding-right: 4px;">vulgar slang</i><a href="https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&espv=2&biw=1360&bih=628&q=define+asshat&sa=X&ei=0I4yVbLhLoPUoASUxICgAw&ved=0CF4Q_SowAA" style="color: #660099; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">asshat</a></span></div>
<div class="lr_dct_more_txt xpdxpnd xpdnoxpnd" data-mh="-1" style="-webkit-transition: max-height 0.3s; display: inline; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; transition: max-height 0.3s;">
<div class="vk_gy">
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m">"that idiot was driving way too fast"</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span data-log-string="synonyms-more-click" jsaction="dob.m">
</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
After all this time, I was unable to find any government employees willing to uphold our state and federal constitutions. Let this blog be the decisive proof...<br />
Your government employees live in la-la land and are incapable of doing the right things and the honest neighborly things. They cannot be trusted from top to bottom, from Obama down to the little bitty inspector. It is likely all hell is going to break loose pretty soon. Things get real ugly when people prefer to believe nonsense, lies, and their own invented rationalizations based on the lies and nonsense they choose to believe. What a mess...<br />
Who is the father of lies and nonsense?<br />
Who is the Author of truth, righteousness, and justice?<br />
Government employees are under the spell of lies and nonsense. That is the only conclusion I can arrive at.<br />
<br />
Proverbs 16:4 <span style="background-color: #fdfeff; color: #001320; font-family: Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: justify;">The LORD works out everything to its proper end-- even the wicked for a day of disaster.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-55841775796141198582015-04-11T09:02:00.000-07:002015-04-12T05:37:58.108-07:00April 11, 2015, UPDATE: The Maze of Proper Procedure... I have waited until now to UPDATE this blog because I wanted to do it after I got my COMPLAINT officially acknowledged and filed within the system. That has not occurred yet. I followed up my certified return receipt mailing to the US District Court with many phone calls. One lady was forthcoming and trying to pass on my COMPLAINT to the US ATTORNEY Mike Ormsby because it is proper procedure for the US Attorney to initiate COMPLAINTS with the court. It is not normal for citizens to initiate complaints. I wonder if there is a written procedure for citizens to initiate CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS which is discouraged by government employees because they do not want the public to be able to enforce the US Code against out of control government employees? You know, the "establishment" wants to maintain their control of all the procedures, rather than open up the process to the general public whom they are supposed to be serving under the direction and constraints of our Supreme Laws of the Land.<br />
I remailed a signed copy of my complaint directly to the US Attorney Mike Ormsby via certified return receipt. I had to do this because his office would not return my phone calls. Seems these people do not want to address my concerns. Perhaps this blog scares them away. If they are doing the right thing, why should they be afraid of this blog? They should not be afraid of it. They should embrace it and uphold and defend our Supreme Laws of the Land. That is where a clear and courageous conscience comes from, but people of weak character do not have the courage to make waves within their corrupt system. That is the fact, and the only correct assumption I can make after failing to make contact with someone who is reviewing my COMPLAINT in the US Attorney's Office.<br />
I will continue my efforts. Will the government employees continue to embarrass themselves? I hope not. I hope that they overcome their fear and disdain for our state and federal constitutions. I really hope they find the courage to openly discuss the issues with me and work with me to correct out of control government employees. All of this mess can probably be found at its root to be the fault of a single idiot bureaucrat or government paid lawyer who wrongly assumed administrative law applied to the general public in a fashion that violated our Bill of Rights. Once they got away with their misapplication of administrative law, they continued to defend it by putting objectors like me through their burdensome bureaucratic maze of nonsense to prevent constitutionalists like me from correcting the abusive policing for profit scheme.<br />
People of weak character gravitate toward government for their own security. Real statesmen do serve We the People by finding the joy of maintaining the individual rights and liberties pretected in our state and federal constitutions. We shall see who are the real statesmen, and who are weak characters warming chairs in government offices working to protect their own little kingdoms, and protect the little kingdoms of their associates in government. I know about the water cooler culture in government buildings. I used to work for the government. I know how they hunger for accolades and how they pat each other on the back even for doing unconstitutional things "for the good of the people." They love finding excuses for justifying laws and regulations which infringe on our Bill of Rights. Government employees like I was are not welcome around the water coolers in government buildings. In fact, government employees like I was scare the pants off the weak characters who seek accolades to build up their weak self esteem and phony prestige. When I would approach the water cooler in my government job, everyone else would run away from me... Seems the truth I spoke hurt their self esteem. They didn't like the simple truth...<br />
Here is a copy of the the cover letter I sent with the copy of my COMPLAINT to the US Attorney's Office:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
April 10, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: U.S. Attorney Mike Ormsby</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: #171e24;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">United
States Attorneys Office</span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /> </span></span><span style="color: #171e24;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">P.O.
Box 1494</span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /> </span></span><span style="color: #171e24;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Spokane,
WA 99210-1494</span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">
</span></span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> </span><strong><span style="color: #171e24;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">(509)
353-2767</span></span></span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">
</span></span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">FROM: Russ
Hinds</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> 10421
E Jutte Ln</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> Elk,
WA 99009</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> (509)292-8150</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">SUBJECT: COMPLAINT
seeking enforcement of 18 USC 242 and 241</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Mr.
Ormsby, </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
March 25, 2015, I mailed a complaint to the office of Magistrate John
T. Rodgers' office with the intention of getting my complaint
officially sworn into the record so that an investigation may be
initiated and a grand jury put in place in order to indict the
ACCUSED who are cited in my COMPLAINT. </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
March 31, 2015, I followed up my certified return receipt mailing
with a phone call to the magistrate's office. I was directed to Rene
Grogan, who told me that complaints were normally initiated by your
office. Mrs. Grogan informed me that she would deliver my COMPLAINT
to your office. </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
April 3, 2015, I left 3 voicemail messages with your assistant (Arne
somebody?), but never received a return phone call. <br /> On April
8, 2015, I contacted your office 2 more times leaving voicemails, and
I contacted Rene Grogan again. Rene said that she had indeed
delivered my complaint to your office and that she would inquire of
its status. She followed up with a phone call informing me that one
of the Assistant US Attorneys was investigating my COMPLAINT and that
they had been in contact with me. ??? That was incorrect. I still do
not have a contact in your office.<br /> Please provide me with a
contact person through whom I may be kept informed of the status of
my COMPLAINT. </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Please
let me remind my public servants of the wisdom of our Founding
Fathers. Our Founding Fathers understood that it was a joy to
maintain individual rights and liberties. They found their joy in
protecting those rights and liberties in our state and federal
constitutions. They even wrote a Bill of Rights for our U.S.
Constitution in order that future government employees may find the
joy of maintaining the freedom of the press, the right to bear arms,
and the right to a trial by jury of good neighbors. <br />
Unfortunately, I have suffered through over 3 years of arguing with
government employees who find some perverted joy in accusing me of
being a bad neighbor in order to justify fining me $1500.00 for
hanging a flier on a private bulletin board. Good neighbors don't do
those things, and good neighbors do not deny their neighbor the right
to a trial by jury before taking their constitutionally protected
rights, liberties, and property away. Let's you and I be good
neighbors and educate these misled and out of control government
employees so that they may also find the joy of maintaining
individual rights and liberties which have been purchased by the
life, limb, and treasure given by those who take an Oath to protect
our constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic. Please
contact me so that we may do our civic duty together, and let us not
ignore our civic duty.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Sincerely,
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> COMPLAINT
enclosed.<br /><br />There is no shame in doing your <a href="https://www.facebook.com/standingforcivicduty?ref=bookmarks">Civic Duty</a>. Hopefully, next week Mike Ormsby will return my call. We shall see! </span></div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-65349527101183135052015-03-26T20:19:00.001-07:002015-03-26T22:43:38.364-07:00March 26, 2015, UPDATE: Signed COMPLAINT in Federal Court<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
I have placed
the ball back into the government employees' court. You know that I
cannot force government employees to do anything. They must figure
out what is the right thing to do in their own conscience. How are
they going to treat their neighbors? How are they going to treat our
state and federal constitutions? How are they going to respect the
life limb, and treasure that has been sacrificed to preserve our
Supreme Laws of the Land? Russ cannot tell them what to do. All I can
do is educate them and give them the opportunity to do the right
thing. Can Russ order a TSA employee to not place his hands between
the legs of that 10 year old little girl or boy? Nope! They do what
they do according to their own conscience. And if their knowledge is
lacking, and if their fear of losing their jobs (emotions) are
dictating their actions, and if the ego thrives on their official
authority over their neighbors, little ol' Russ is going to have
little effect on what they do. ONLY THE SIMPLE TRUTH GIVEN TO THEM
CAN CHANGE THEIR ACTIONS. The simple truth is the only weapon I have.
This is what filing a complaint in US District Court is about. It is
about presenting the simple truth to those who have been too long
denying the simple truth and living in their own world of lies,
nonsense, and unfounded fears...</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
Here is my
COMPLAINT:</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>COMPLAINT for filing:</b>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
In the
</div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT </b>
</div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Eastern District of
Washington</div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Honorable Rosanna Molouf
Peterson, Chief District Judge</div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Sean F. McAvoy, District
Court Executive/Clerk of Court</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>BEFORE:</b></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Magistrate Judge John T Rodgers</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
P.O. Bo1493
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Spokane, WA 99210</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509) 458-5240</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>COMPLAINANT:</b></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
-----------------
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
-----------------
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509) ********</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
--Seeks enforcement of
U.S. Code--</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>PURSUANT TO:</b></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"> <span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">TITLE
18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE<br /><br />
PART I - CRIMES<br /><br /> CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL
RIGHTS</span></span></span><strong><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
Sec. 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law </span></span></span></strong><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /><br />-STATUTE-</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #e6e6e6; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Whoever, under color of </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><u><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">any
law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom</span></u></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">,
willfully subjects </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><u><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">any
person</span></u></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">
in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><u><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States,</span></u></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">
or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such
person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are
prescribed for the punishment of citizens, </span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or
both;</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">
and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of
this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of
this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title,
or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be
sentenced to death. </span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br />
<b>UNDER:</b></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">FEDERAL
RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Title
II</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Rule
3 The complaint</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">The
complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constituting
the offense charged. Except as provided in Rule 4.1, it must be made
under oath before a magistrate judge or, if none is reasonably
available, before a state or local judicial officer. </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">
COMPLAINANT, Russ Hinds, provides for Magistrate Judge John T.
Rodgers the Attached Written Statement of the essential facts,
including the supporting documents, constituting the charged
Violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 by the individuals named here as the
ACCUSED:</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">ACCUSED</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Inspector
Phillip Jordan</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">901
North Monroe St. Suite 101</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Spokane,
WA 99201</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">(509)
324-2542</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">ACCUSED</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Inspector
Michael Thrams</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">525
E. College Way #H</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Mt
Vernon WA 98273</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">(360)
416-3095</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">--and--</span></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><b>PURSUANT
TO:</b></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">TITLE
18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /><br />
</span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">PART
I - CRIMES</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /><br />
</span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">CHAPTER
13 - CIVIL RIGHTS</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span><strong><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
</span></span></strong><strong><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Sec.
241. Conspiracy against rights</span></span></strong><span style="color: black;"><br /></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">-STATUTE-</span></span><span style="color: black;"><br /></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">
</span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">If
two or more persons conspire to i</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">njure</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">,
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><u><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">oppress</span></u></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">,
threaten, or intimidate </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><u><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">any
person</span></u></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">
in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><u><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">in
the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to
him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of
his having so exercised the same</span></u></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">;</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><br /></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">or</span></span><span style="color: black;"><br /><br />
</span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">If
two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises
of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or
enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -</span></span><span style="color: black;"><br /></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">
</span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background: #e6e6e6;">They
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten
years, or both;</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">
and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this
section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap,
aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual
abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be
sentenced to death. </span></span><span style="color: black;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">COMPLAINANT,
Russ Hinds, provides the Attached Written Statement of the essential
facts, including the supporting documents, constituting the charged
Violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 by the individuals named here as the
ACCUSED:</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">ACCUSED</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Assistant
Attorney General Angela Zurlini</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">1116
West Riverside Ave</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Spokane,
WA 99201</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">(509)
456-3123</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">ACCUSED</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Administrative
Law Judge Mark Kim</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">16201
East Indiana Avenue Suite 5100</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Spokane
Valley, WA 99216</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">(509)
456-3975</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">ACCUSED</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Superior
Court Judge Gregory Sypolt</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">1116
West Broadway Ave</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">3<sup>rd</sup>
Floor Annex</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Spokane,
WA 99260</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">(509)
477-6373</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">ACCUSED</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Superior
Court Judge Marianne Moreno</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">1116
West Broadway Ave</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">3<sup>rd</sup>
Floor Annex</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">Spokane,
WA 99260</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">(509)
477-4712</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">ACCUSED<br />and
any other individuals found to be aiding and abetting in the
Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law in the COMPLAINANT's
Written Statement of the Essential Facts, and the resulting
investigation/discovery, </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="CENTER" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">COMPLAINANT'S
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE ESSENTIAL FACTS</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><i>Whereas</i>
the people of the great state of Washington entered the union of the
United States under the terms of the Constitution of the United
States of America;</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><i>Whereas</i>
the terms of the U.S. Constitution require the people of the state of
Washington to openly declare the U.S Constitution to be the Supreme
Law of the Land in the State of Washington's Constitution; </span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><i>Whereas</i>
the U.S. Constitution protects the liberties and rights of
individuals residing within the borders of the 50 states by the
Articles in the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights;</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><i>Whereas</i>
any state law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom shall not
violate, pervert, or infringe on the liberties and rights protected
within the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights without first
amending the Constitution and the Bill of Rights;</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><i>Whereas</i>
the Representatives of the States in Congress determined it necessary
to codify and assess penalties on individuals of weak and corrupt
character in any state government who have abused their position of
authority by the <span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution [and Bill of Rights] or laws of the United States in 18
USC 241 and 242; </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">[</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Historical
note:</span></i></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
As the U.S.A. expanded admitting new states from east coast to west
coast, there were men of corrupt character capable of attaining high
office in the newly formed governments of the newly admitted states
of the union, or capable of buying off men of weak character in the
newly formed state governments in order to increase their wealth and
power over their neighbors in the state. </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Note
the land wars. </span></i></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Today,
heavily financed special interest groups and corporations influence
men and women of weak character in government to enact
unconstitutional laws which favor their own interests in the
marketplace, thus curtailing the free exchange of goods and services
in the marketplace among those with less money, influence, and power.
These despicable practices are common throughout history.]</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Whereas</span></i></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
COMPLAINANT, Russ Hinds, has over the course of 3+ years exhausted
all methods of Appeal and Petition within Washington State government
to resolve the issuance of 2 Washington Department of Labor and
Industry citations containing harmful fines totaling $1500.00 and
threats of other penalties which fly in the face of our U.S.
Constitution and Bill of Rights by depriving Russ Hinds of his
Constitutionally protected right to publish a list of his skills on a
simple flier which was posted on a private owned bulletin
board--which was located in Yokes Market, Deer Par, WA, for the
purpose of posting such notices and fliers for the benefit of the
public;</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"> <span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Comes
now, Russ Hinds, the undersigned COMPLAINANT, before the magistrate
in United States District Court, being duly sworn upon oath, and
under penalties of perjury, and states that there is probable cause
to believe that the above-named ACCUSED have violated the statutes
18 USC 241 and 242</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
October 15, 2011, I posted a truthful innocent flier on the bulletin
board located in Yokes Market, Deer park, WA. [See Exhibit 1]
attached. Notice that there is no intent to defraud or harm my
neighbors found in the words of my flier. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
October 25, 2011, I received a call on my cell phone from Insp.
Phillip Jordan of Washington Department of Labor and Industries.
Insp. Jordan informed me that I would be receiving a $500.00 citation
in the mail from WDLI for including the word “electrical” on my
flier. This seemed completely outrageous and unconstitutional to me.
I wondered what kind of scam is going on here. I know I have a
constitutionally protected right to publish a list of my skills. I
called my father to see if he had given anyone my mailing address as
it was not present on the flier. My father stated that he had been
called by someone identifying himself as someone needing work
completed on his unfinished bedroom remodel. This caller insisted on
mailing some blueprints for me to look at before he would use my
services, but dad replied that I work by the hour and I am not doing
contract work, however dad was sure I had the skills to complete a
simple bedroom remodel. After further coaxing, dad relented and gave
the guy on the phone my mailing address. I told dad that he had been
deceived by a government employee in order that the government
employee may mail me a $500.00 citation for hanging a flier on a
bulletin board. Dad did not believe me. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
November 2, 2011, I received an unsigned citation accompanied by a
unsigned threatening letter demanding that I pay a $500.00 penalty to
the address given. [See Exhibit 2 attached] I thought this was a mail
fraud scam because I did not get the courtesy of a face to face
conversation with someone showing me their credentials. Nevertheless,
I followed the instructions on the letter and filed an appeal of the
citation in order to request my constitutionally protected right to a
trial by jury before my liberty and property ($500.00) could be taken
from me by government employees. Upon getting a legitimate response
to my request for an appeal from WDLI, I honestly drew the conclusion
that WDLI is running a “police for profit” scam with their
administrative law. Administrative Law is law that governs the
administration of a government program and is limited to that
government program AND not to be applied to the general public which
has not contracted or applied to work under the administrative law
governing the program. I had not, and still have not, applied to work
under the administrative law that governs WDLI. I have not signed
away my constitutionally protected rights by applying to work for my
good neighbors under a license issued by WDLI. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
November 4, 2011, my father received another phone call from someone
pretending to be interested in using my services which were offered
on my flier. Dad knew that he was being lied to again by a government
employee because he and my mom had removed all of my fliers. Dad
said, “I am sorry, sir. My son is no longer offering his services
because he got a ticket in the mail for $500.00 from WDLI for looking
for a job. What kind of lowlife piece of **** would send a guy
looking for work a $500.00 ticket in the mail? ...”</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
November 8, 2011, I received another unsigned threatening letter with
a citation demanding payment of a $1000.00 fine for the same flier,
on the same bulletin board, for the same day as the previous
citation. [See Exhibit 3 attached] I followed the instructions on
that letter and filed for an appeal so that I could request my
constitutionally protected right to a trial by a jury of my good
neighbors. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">My
request for a due process trial by jury was ignored and a date of May
24, 2012, was set for an administrative hearing before Administrative
Law Judge Mark Kim. Please note here that a trial by jury could have
resolved the citations in 6 weeks, however, WDLI finds it convenient
to take up a great deal of time, effort, and expense in order to make
it easier for victims of their “police for profit” scam to just
pay the fine rather than contest it. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">With
the expectation that courts and hearings in America are supposed to
protect the innocent and hold the guilty accountable according to the
whole truth, which is a correct expectation of We the People whom
government employees are supposed to serve, I take the time and
effort to file briefs and etc. with ALJ Mark Kim myself. I did not
desire to turn a little flier on a bulletin board into thousands of
dollars spent on attorney's fees. [These briefs and all other
documentation pertaining to these 2 citations will be timely
presented to the court and defense at request any time before trial
of the ACCUSED.] It is notable that AAG Angela Zurlini's Brief to ALJ
Mark Kim opens with “Naked castings into the constitutional sea do
not warrant judicial consideration or discussion.” I asked ALJ Mark
Kim what a “constitutional sea” is? I am still waiting for an
answer. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">ALJ
Mark Kim and AAG Angela Zurlini proceed with the appeal hearing.</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">ALJ
Mark Kim and AAG Angela Zurlini then conspired to place me under
jurisdiction of administrative law while not showing any proof that I
had applied or contracted to be a participant of their Administrative
Programs. This was deliberately done in order to defend the
legitimacy of the citations, and defend the actions of the Inspectors
Phillip Jordan and Michael Thrams. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Phillip
Jordan and Michael Thrams, like all citizens and good neighbors of
the United States have a civic duty to uphold our Supreme Law of the
Land, the U.S. Constitution. However, men of weak character will
often disregard their civic duty if they are led to believe that
their job may be at risk if they do not do as instructed by their
supervisors. There is no excuse for ALJ Mark Kim and AAG Angela
Zurlini, though. Both ALJ Mark Kim and AAG Angela Zurlini have
taken Washington State's OATH OF ATTORNEY which states in part, “</span></span>I
will support the Constitution of the State of Washington and the
Constitution of the United States.”</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;">I evidently won the argument in
the Appeal Hearing because ALJ Mark Kim stated in his Final Order,</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">"It
appears to this Tribunal that the penalty in the Appellant's case
seems extreme in light of the fact that the Appellant was only
seeking minor jobs hoping to earn some extra income. Further, it
appears to this tribunal that the legislature has written RCW
18.27.200(1) so broadly that it essentially covers almost every
activity of work, some of which might not directly impact the public
policy of the statute."</span></span> </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">ALJ
Mark Kim then disregards his civic duty and his OATH OF ATTORNEY by
stating, </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;">"The
Office of Administrative Hearings is unable to render an opinion
regarding the constitutionality of chapter 19.28 RCW. Addressing
these arguments falls outside the scope of what this tribunal has
authority to address. "[T]he power of an administrative tribunal
to fashion a remedy is strictly limited by statute</span></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;"><i>."Skagit
Surveyors and Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit County, 135 Wash.
2d 542, 558, 958, P. 2d 962, 970 (1998).</i></span></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;"> The
appropriate forum for such claims is in a court of general
jurisdiction such as, Washington State Superior Court."</span></span></span>
The only way ALJ Mark Kim can be correct in the previous statement is
if Administrative Law and Administrative Hearings are strictly
limited in jurisdiction to be applied only to those individuals who
have agreed to place themselves under administrative law, and under
the jurisdiction of Administrative Law Judges, by application or
contract. Once again, I have not applied, or contracted, to work
under the administration of the WDLI programs. I have not signed an
agreement waiving my constitutionally protected rights and liberties.
I should not have been issued the 2 citations because administrative
law does not apply to the general public who have not signed away
their constitutionally protected rights and liberties by
participating in government programs governed by administrative law.
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">ALJ
Mark Kim's Final Orders keep both citations and fines in place.
[Exhibits 4 and 5 attached]</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">I
then appeal the ALJ Mark Kim's PROPOSED DECISION AND ORDER for the
electrical citation to the Electrical Board in Olympia where I am
told:</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">BOARD
MEMBER GUILLOT “You are not the only victim that has come in here
and waved the American flag. And I'm telling you that the bottom line
of all these rules---”</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">MR.
HINDS “Is the Supreme Law of the Land”</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">BOARD
MEMBER GUILLOT “No it's not. It's to save public lives. We do not
want our citizens burned down because of something that was done
wrong.<br />The above is taken from the transcript of the Electrical
Board hearing. [See Exhibit 6 attached] Guillot admits that I am a
victim and that there have been other victims to stand before the
Electrical Board. The problem is, Guillot thinks that accusing his
neighbors of being a danger to their neighbors and fining the accused
$500.00 saves lives. We have a system for law enforcement to accuse
people of being a danger to their neighbors. Law enforcement simply
files charges and then proceeds to get a conviction by a jury of good
neighbors. That is how you lawfully, and under the U.S Constitution,
handle dangerous people who are accused of being danger to their
neighbors. Juries do not convict their neighbors on the silly
unprovable assumption that he </span><u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">might</span></u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
be a danger to his neighbors, either! Guillot's reasoning is silly,
immature, and arrogant because he assumes I </span><u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">might</span></u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
be a danger to my neighbors. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">[NOTE
FOR THE COURT: A false statement on WDLI's web page titled </span><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">About
the Electrical Program</span></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">may be
confusing to government employees</span></u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.
The statement reads, </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">“</span></span><span style="font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode, Lucida Grande, Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">All
electrical work done in Washington is inspected for quality and
safety to keep Washington's citizens safe.”</span></span> The truth
is, maintenance technicians lacking Electrician Licenses who are
employed by apartment complexes, Washington State government, and
other businesses make minor electrical repairs such as replacing
receptacles, switches, relays, ballasts, etc. without WDLI permits,
licenses, or supervision. Inspector Phillip Jordan and his
supervisors have stretched the application of their Administrative
Law and jurisdiction in order to collect on fines issued to
individuals who engage in the free exchange of goods and services.
They are not applying the law equally to all individuals as required
by Article 14 of the Bill of Rights, Equal Protection Under the Law,
because they do not issue citations to maintenance technicians
employed by apartment complexes, Washington state government, etc.
There is also a section on the WDLI website which states “When a
permit is not required,” with a large list of minor electrical
repairs that are exempt from the permit process.]</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
February 22, 2013, I filed an appeal of ALJ Mark Kim's ORDER with the
Superior Court for Spokane County. In AAG Angela Zurlini's brief to
the Superior Court she states, “Mr. Hinds does not have a right to
a jury in this case.” [See Exhibit 7 attached] Judge Gregory Sypolt
joins AAG Zurlini in violating 18 USC 241 and 242 by ignoring or
denying my request for my constitutionally protected right to a trial
by jury, which is protected by Article 6 in the Bill of Rights of the
U.S Constitution. After taking some time for oral argument, Judge
Sypolt then rules in favor of upholding the unconstitutional citation
and fine. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
July 18, 2012, I filed an appeal of ALJ Mark Kim's FINAL ORDER
upholding the unconstitutional Contractor citation and $1000.00 fine
with the Superior Court for Spokane County. After paying a $50.00
fee, I was not given a date for appearing before the court until
after Judge Sypolt had heard the appeal of the Electrical Citation. I
don't know why there was such a long delay. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">On
August 30, 2013, I appeared before Judge Maryann Moreno with AAG
Angela Zurlini representing WDLI. Judge Moreno stated that she had
read the entire transcript of ALJ Mark Kim's hearing, and then
remarked, “It appears to me that you do not have a beef with me or
this court, but rather you have a beef with the Washington State
legislature.” I was amused at this tactic because I have heard it
before. Government employees always seek to deter and distract people
from the simple and right remedy to the issue, which is simply
<u>adhering to the Supreme Law of the Land,</u>
Instead, they attempt to send me on a wild goose chase fruitlessly
trying to reason with 150 legislators. The truth is, I do not
have a beef with anybody. WDLI Inspectors Phillip Jordan and Michael
Thrams have a beef with me as demonstrated by their 2
unconstitutional citations. Nevertheless, Judge Maryann Moreno joined
AAG Angela Zurlini in violation of 18 USC 241 and 242 by upholding
the unconstitutional $1000.00 fine and citation. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">I
appealed both Judge Moreno's and Judge Sypolt's rulings to the Court
of Appeals of Washington State within the 30 day requirement. I filed
for a waiver of the $580.00 fees. The Waiver of Fees was denied by
the Supreme Court of Washington State. No further action was taken by
me, and the Court of Appeals discharged my appeal due to lack of fees
paid. <br />Within the recent weeks, Washington Department of Labor and
Industries has resumed their assault on my constitutionally protected
rights under color of law by hiring a collection agency to collect
the $500.00 fine, and by sending me a disturbing letter demanding
payment of the $1000.00 fine for the contractor program citation
which pretends that I am a registered Contractor with their agency.
[See Exhibits 8 and 9] </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">From
the beginning of this troublesome and costly argument with
misdirected government employees, I have kept a running Blog online
in order to keep the simple truth clear and simple. Most, if not all
of the pertinent documents and my responses have been uploaded to the
blog. I have also kept in touch with my representatives in the
legislature since the beginning. All of the expenses incurred by the
people of the state of Washington and by me could have been avoided
if everyone involved simply did their neighborly civic duty to uphold
our state and federal constitutions, and adhered to their Oath of
Office. I am saddened by the government employees' lack of respect
for the lives, limbs, and treasure that has been given in order to
preserve the liberties and rights which are protected in our Supreme
Laws of the Land for our posterity. How in the world can my simple
sixth grade level communication with government employees fail to
resolve these citations according to our Supreme Law of the Land, I
do not know. Perhaps the disdain shown in Inspector Phillip Jordan’s
statement about our phone conversation shows the reason why, “Russ
started in again about our nation's constitution. I terminated our
phone conversation.” [See Exhibit 10 attached] </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">My
father and 3 of my sons have risked their lives defending the
Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. I can do no less
than they have done. I can look them in the eye and they can look me
in the eye. We hate to see all this foolishness overtaking our great
country. The foolishness needs to stop. We need to right the boat
before it completely capsizes. I pray that there are men and women
left who can help me right the boat. </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">URL
to the Blog: http ********</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">The
number of comments to my blog from other “victims,” as portrayed
by Board Member Guillot, show cause for an audit of WDLI's revenue
collection through unconstitutional fines issued to the general
public. Thousands of $500.00 - $1000.00 fines issued to people who
post truthful ads on CraigsList and fliers on bulletin boards across
the state of Washington are a tremendous boon to the employees of
WDLI, -funding their salaries, benefits, and retirement systems. By
statute, revenue collected from WDLI fees and fines goes back into
the operating budget of WDLI. There exists the incentive to issue
citations and fines to the general public under the color of law,
administrative law--which does not apply to the general public. The
fliers such as mine and the posts to CraigsList, which are fined by
WDLI employees, are not fraudulently claiming to be licensed under
WDLI administration, rather they are simply honest free speech in an
effort to participate in the free exchange of goods and services. The
free exchange of goods and services is not an illegal act in the
U.S.A. [Example for the court: I (any home owner) can obtain a permit
to build a permanent structure on my property through the appropriate
county offices. The permit process requires me to obtain certain
inspections for the safety of people using the permanent structure.
During construction, I can go down to the local VFW and hire a guy
off the bar stool to help me build forms for the foundation, frame
the walls, construct the roof, and install the electrical wiring. No
licensing is required to do these things as long as the work is found
to be up to code by the inspectors assigned to the project through
the building permit process. The government employees are there to
help the general public, not make a profit off the general public.]</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">The
licensing programs were put into place by the state legislature for
the convenience of the general public in order to provide an honest
means of determining the qualifications of an individual who
participates in the free exchange of goods and services. Obtaining a
license from WDLI is proof to the consumer that the service provider
has met a minimum standard of competence in the field the license
covers. The licensing program is not in place to monopolize the free
exchange of goods and services by making it illegal for me to hire a
guy off a bar stool to help me replace a light switch. However, the
unions involved in the construction trades do lobby the legislature
and WDLI for laws and enforcement that prohibits unlicensed free
exchange of goods and services for their own benefit and the benefit
of their members. The lobbyists have found much success with men and
women of weak and corrupt character who are employed in the state
bureaucracies and legislature. Perhaps, sometimes it is just very
easy for shrewd and deceptive lobbyists to pull the wool over the
eyes of gullible naive inexperienced executive bureaucrats,
government paid incompetent counsel, and “average citizen”
legislators. Perhaps something needs to be said about government
schools that graduate individuals who do not know that it is their
good neighbor civic duty to support the rule of law in our Supreme
Laws of the Land and abide by their Oath of Office. Those neighbors
who do not wish to support our Supreme Laws of the Land simply need
to convince their neighbors to change the Supreme Law of the Land
<u>before</u> instituting unconstitutional legislation, application,
and enforcement of “law” that violates the liberties and rights
protected in our state and federal constitutions. I regret that the
lack of a proper education in civic duty has caused so much trouble
and expense for the people of the state of Washington in this case.</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Submitted
under oath and with all due respect for the court by the undersigned:</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">COMPLAINANT
______________________________ Date.________________________</span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Witnesses'
and Officials' signatures: </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="line-height: 200%; margin-bottom: 0in; orphans: 1;">
<br />
NOTE FOR BLOG READERS: The "Exhibits" have already been uploaded to this blog in the order I received them and UPDATED the blog with my responses.</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
I have
literally had a lifetime experience arguing with government employees
and other liars attempting to justify their assaults on me by lying
and falsely accusing me of being a “bad guy.” I have seen just
about every excuse a government employee can drum up for not abiding
by the good neighborly thing to do, which is to uphold our Supreme
Law of the Land. Honestly, I am very sick of these weak insecure
egotistical and arrogant toddlers assaulting me and seeking every
childish way to cover their ass. It is old and tiresome to me. Do you
want a list? If you have read this complete blog, you have already
read about many of my experiences with idiots in authority. Let me
list just some of them for you:<br />
1. As a child I had numerous
experiences with local police harassing me on my mini-bike and
motorcycles.<br />
2. Going through an unwanted divorce, I had a wife
who told the court that she was afraid of me because of my temper
although I had never laid a hand on her, even after her deliberate
attempts to provoke me into hitting her so that she could get her
divorce. We argued over her obsession with the expensive and foolish
“social life” at the local bars. She got her divorce and became a
bartender shacking up with a number of idiots found in the bars. The
court judge said, “Shacking up and tending bar are not sufficient
grounds to remove the children from their mother and return them to
you.” The judge made it legal for at-fault adulterous mothers to
throw away not-at-fault fathers and keep his children and income,
while forcing a loving father to helplessly watch his sons raised in
shack ups and bars. Very sickening and it fills a father with tons
and tons of grief. My efforts to communicate common sense and common
decency with the Siskiyou County courts were not fruitful. Government
employees mostly do not have a conscience.
</div>
<ol start="3">
<li><div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
I had a boss,
a Maintenance Foreman, at the National Park Service who wanted to
get me fired. He wrote up 2 letters of admonishment, 2 letters of
reprimand, and a proposal to suspend me for 14 days. On the 14 day
suspension, the guy walked up to me while screaming at me. He got so
close to me in my face and in my space that our chests touched. He
was trying to provoke me into throwing a punch at him, but it didn't
work. Since he was so close to me, I rubbed noses with him like the
Eskimos do in Alaska. I filed responses and Grievances to all of his
adverse actions against me. I went all they way up the appeals
process and eventually got a judge from Washington DC to come out
and conduct a trial in the National Park I was employed. The end
result was, management at the park exposed to everyone up the chain
of command how childish and incompetent they were. All of upper
management protected the foreman and superintendent, but my foreman
learned a lot and he ceased his efforts to get me fired. I earned
his respect because he knew what a fool he had made of himself in
front of park staff and upper management in the regional offices. In
my responses, I was pleased to include character references from all
but three of the staff at the park, plus several from staff who had
transferred to other parks. The Superintendent retired before the
hearing in the park with the judge from Washington DC.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
After a
period of peace while I raised a family in my second marriage, the
assaults began again. Both at my job as a Maintenance Supervisor in
a high-end apartment complex, and with the local Reno police. I
make friends easy. At the apartment complex, many respected
professionals and retirees living there stormed the Superintendent's
office in my defense protesting my being fired. And, once again,
that issue was over nothing but a lot of nonsense and false
accusations. Just like the Park Service battle was over nonsense and
ego. I never knew toddlers could have such huge egos.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
I got
assaulted by police in Reno who lied on their citations claiming
that I resisted arrest. All three charges were dismissed...</div>
</li>
</ol>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
Then I come
to Washington, and in less than 1 month I am embroiled in another
nonsensical argument with insecure and egotistical government
employees. I am sick of it.<br />
Here is the cover letter that I
included with my COMPLAINT in US District Court. It is self
explanatory:</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
March 25, 2015</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
TO: Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
U.S. District Court</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
PO Box 1493
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Spokane, WA 99210</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
FROM: Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
------------------</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Elk, WA 99009</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
(509)********</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
SUBJECT: Swearing in of a COMPLAINT</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Judge John T. Rodgers,</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I would like to swear in the
enclosed COMPLAINT. I attempted to do this on March 18, 2015, but I
was not allowed to enter the federal court house because I do not
have a picture ID. May we please make arrangements to get my
complaint made official by testimony under penalty of perjury and
filed on record with your court? <br />
Today, I drove to Newport,
WA, Department of Licensing and Registration to get a Washington
State picture ID. I showed the public servant a certified copy of my
birth certificate, a Social Security Card, a photo copy of my old
Nevada Drivers License, and proof of my address. The public servant
refused to give me a Washington State Picture ID. She had a problem
with my certified copy of my birth certificate, and she said that I
need 2 more proofs of ID. Therefore she needed me to get a new
certified copy of my birth certificate and ask other government
agencies for other documents proving that I am not a terrorist, or
proving that I exist, and that I am who I say I am. <br />
The time
required for obtaining these documents, and the out of pocket
expense, is detrimental to the timely filing of my COMPLAINT in US
District Court. After 3 years of trying to respectfully communicate
and resolve the citations contained within my complaint according to
our Supreme Law of the Land, I am afraid that further delay may be
detrimental to my case. <br />
My effort and motivation for filing
this COMPLAINT is for the education of my neighbors employed in
government. If we wish to remain a civilized society of good
neighbors who do their civic duty to support and defend our state and
federal constitutions, we need government employees to be aware of
the consequences of their unconstitutional actions. Evidently,
government employees are not trained to support our Supreme Laws of
the Land. My COMPLAINT is directed at educating government employees
and maintaining a civilized society of good neighbors.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Please call me at my phone number
above to inform me of a time I may appear for swearing in and signing
in your presence. I will show up at any time you specify if you will
inform the security guard at the door of the federal court to let me
in. I am fine with an escort to your chambers if need be. <br />
<br />
Thank
you very much,</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Russ Hinds</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
Enclosure:
COMPLAINT</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
I have done
the best I could. I could not reason with the ladies who issue
picture IDs. I could not reason with the federal court security
guard. Honestly, these people can look for ways to accommodate the
needs of their neighbors. If they were ridiculously afraid I might be
a threat to the court, they could have escorted me into the court so
that I could conduct my business there. Yet, these government
employees have their head up their ass. They have forgotten common
sense and common decency under their made-up excuses and fear of
“threats” from terrorists and constitutionalists. It is blatently
and completely obvious that I am not a terrorist, yet idiots who are
supposed to be good neighbors display irrational fear. You cannot
reason with irrational people. They are too quick to invent
irrational lies to justify their false fears and justify (protect)
their job and paycheck. <br />
I sent the COMPLAINT via Certified
Mail with a return receipt. Once again, my only weapon is the simple
and rational truth... What they do with it is up to them. <br />
<br />
The ball is in their court... <br />
<br />
I need to notify all of the
Washington State Legislature and my readers. Now, we will see what
happens...
</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
Oh yeah,
California still owes me (and a lot of other fathers) an apology for
forcing me to watch my sons raised in shack-ups and bars. Perhaps if
the fathers in California decided to do the role God gave them to do,
then their drought would be over. I mean forcing a father to not be
able to love, lead, TEACH, take care of, and PROTECT his children is
abhorrent to our loving Father in heaven. He will find ways to
correct their error by the consequences He has established.
<br />
<br />
2Chronicles 7:13,14</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in;">
If I shut up heaven that there be no
rain, or if I command the locusts to devour the land or if I send
pestilence among My people,</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.23in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
if My
people, who are called by My name, shall humble themselves and pray,
and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear
from heaven, and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.</div>
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div style="line-height: 0.21in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
Mal. 4:6 <span style="color: #001320;"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">He
will turn the hearts of the parents to their children, and the hearts
of the children to their parents; or else I (the Lord) will come and
strike the land with total destruction."</span></span></span>
<br />
<br />
Wake up America! We used to be a civilized society of good
neighbors...</div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-48823316792035837662015-03-10T12:09:00.000-07:002015-03-14T21:14:48.491-07:00March 10, 2015, UPDATE: Hurt feelings in the legislature... Last week I spoke to two Legislative Assistants over the phone. The first one was a pleasant conversation with a person who seemed to care about government functioning correctly under our state and federal constitutions. She promised that she would look over my blog. There was one instance in the conversation in which she was candid about her feelings. I had said that government employees need to know the alphabet and have a 4th grade reading comprehension level in order to understand and uphold our Supreme Laws of the Land. She did not like that statement I made, and she pointed out that she works hard and does not appreciate people abusing government employees. I told her that I used to work for the government and I hated the public disdain for government employees, too. I hated when jokes were made about a government work crew repairing a road, five guys watching one guy with a shovel. I worked hard in my government job as a NPS maintenance technician, and I was often annoyed by the laziness of my co-workers. Anyway, this conversation with the first LA ended respectfully. I assume that this LA does have some respect for our Supreme Laws of the Land. However, being immersed in a legislature that has few members who know the alphabet and have a 4th grade reading comprehension level makes it very difficult to accomplish anything that resembles "protecting and maintaining individual rights" as required by our Washington State Constitution. Nonetheless, I here give my deep appreciation for the candid phone conversation. I hope that we can continue encouraging and inspiring We the People's representatives to adhere to their Oath of Office.<br />
The conversation I had with the other Legislative Assistant was absolutely horrible and left me bummed out for 3 days. I have waited until now to UPDATE my blog hoping that this legislative assistant might contact me to apologize for hanging up on me. She has not contacted me...<br />
This legislative assistant recognized who I was after I introduced myself over the phone. She launched into a grievance about a previous phone conversation we had. She claimed that I was abusive, disrespectful, and cussed her out on our last phone conversation. She stated that prior to that conversation, she had worked hours and hours on my case, however she would not devote anymore time to my case after that conversation and after I had written about her on my blog. I did not find anything I wrote about her, but I did find where I wrote about her boss, Rep. Shelly Short.<br />
I have no memory of a phone conversation with this Legislative Assistant in which I became abusive, and cussed her out. In fact, I have many memories of deliberately desiring NOT to cuss government employees out, especially my state representatives. Before each phone call I made, I would remind myself to be nice and not let them anger me to the point of losing it. Me thinks there is a different reason for this legislative assistant to be upset. I think that previous UPDATES to this blog, which mention the legislator whom this LA works for, angered both the legislator, Shelly Short, AND her assistant. Here are the UPDATES which may have upset these very sensitive people:<br />
May 28, 2014<br />
June 15, 2014<br />
July 1, 2014<br />
July 11, 2014<br />
July 18, 2014<br />
October 4, 2014<br />
<br />
Those UPDATES begin with me expressing appreciation for Rep. Short's effort to get a "Helping the Local Handyman" bill passed. I learned that the entire legislature has handicapped itself by making a rule that "all legislation is to be considered constitutional by all legislators until the Washington State Supreme Court decides otherwise." Basically, the legislature has nullified its own Oath of Office because their rules prevent them from expressing their opinion on unconstitutional legislation. How crazy is that? We the People have a neighborly civic duty to support and uphold our state and federal constitutions, yet the legislature nullified their neighborly civic duty AND their Oath of Office. That is pretty frustrating for a guy like me to run into a wall such as that ridiculous nonsense. In the following UPDATES I firmly express my disappointment and I reluctantly begin to mention names, even while trying very hard to be respectful and understanding. What is wrong with adhering to your Oath of Office? Does exposing government nonsense anger very sensitive people to the point that they no longer feel obligated to adhere to their Oath of Office? Does being angry at little ol' Russ Hinds justify a state representative and her assistant ignoring the unconstitutional enforcement of unconstitutional RCWs? No. The unconstitutional enforcement of unconstitutional RCW's is way bigger than little ol' Russ Hinds... but now these two individuals have given themselves the excuse they need for dropping the ball. Once again, never mind the fact that much life, limb, and treasure has been given to defend our state and federal constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic.<br />
To me, this appears to be about as childish as anyone can get. I honestly believe that this legislative assistant exaggerated my firmness and frankness in our phone conversation to further justify dropping any further effort to assist little ol' Russ Hinds. I can picture them feeling mutually insulted by my blog posts and feeding off each other's anger to the point of accusing me of cussing out the legislative assistant over the phone. I wish we had a recording of the phone conversation. I also suspect that this legislative assistant has poisoned the well for me. It seems quite possible that this lady LA, when contacted by other legislators and LAs, is quick to discredit me and my efforts to correct unconstitutional out of control government and government employees. Rather than being encouraged to join me in doing the right thing defending our Supreme Laws of the Land on my blog, my other representatives and LAs are possibly told to fear my blog by someone who got their panties in a bunch.<br />
My blog posts listed above start out being respectful and appreciative and then progress to firm and frank truthfulness. Some frustration on my part is present in my blog posts as I fail to understand legislators who nullify their Oath of Office with ridiculous rules coming from their leaders and their government paid lawyers giving bad counsel.<br />
I hope I am being very simple and clear here. I want people to understand what I am writing, therefore I am frank, bringing out the obvious. Obvious, obvious, obvious... I do not live in la-la land where the simple and obvious are blown off and disregarded.<br />
Anyway, I am not going to Olympia. I won't waste my time and money with people whose feelings have been hurt beyond common sense. Hurt feelings do not justify throwing out a simple and beautiful opportunity to correct out of control unconstitutional government by protecting the right of individuals to publish a list of their skills and protecting our right to a trial by jury before government employees can take away liberty to publish and take away property by assessing outrageous $1500.00 fines for hanging an innocent truthful flyer on a private bulletin board.<br />
Please note that my feelings are not hurt. These people can do what they want to do. What they do and think does not affect my comfort with myself and with God. They can think of me any way they want, however true and untrue their thoughts are. I just have an attitude of disappointment. I am disappointed in my neighbors who take an Oath of Office to support and defend our state and federal constitutions for the people they are supposed to be representing. I am very sure that my father and three of my sons who risked life and limb to defend our constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic are proud of me, despite the petty childish anger displayed by people in government who take an Oath of Office. I have put up a thorough and long fight. I have no regrets and no shame. I can look my children and grandchildren in the eye and tell them of my efforts to uphold our Supreme Laws of the Land. There is no shame in doing our civic duty to support our Supreme Laws of the Land...<br />
May shame fall on those who truthfully deserve it. May it wake them up to doing their neighborly civic duty...<br />
Meanwhile, because of these experiences which have prompted these most recent posts to this blog, I have resolved that we will not return to common sense, common decency, and constitutional government until the hammer falls. Government will continue taxing, spending, and building the police state and the welfare state. They will raise taxes on gasoline and they will increase regulation on everything that good life involves. It is a terrible disgrace. Our founding father John Adams is repenting in heaven right now:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Posterity, you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it. </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>John Adams</b></span><br />
<br />
<br />
I am a big boy. I am a forgiving and understanding individual. It is never too late to work with me to uphold and defend our state and federal constitutions and restrain out of control government and its mis-directed government employees. I am still hoping to find wise mature representatives and government employees who honor and respect the life, limb, and treasure given to preserve the rights and liberties protected in our sate and federal constitutions for our posterity.<br />
Simple, simple, simple... Get a grip! They really and truly do need to have that epiphany I have spoke of many times in previous UPDATES. Who would have ever thought that an Oath of Office could become an epiphany??? Good grief!<br />
<br />
The truth is, my father and 3 sons have served in foreign wars to defend the right of Rep. Short and her Legislative Assistant to publish a list of their skills and their right to a trial by jury. I am completely honored to stand with them in their effort to uphold liberty and justice for all, even though I have not taken the risk of life and limb as they did.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-56195901805696629682015-02-28T14:30:00.000-08:002015-03-02T05:18:25.208-08:00February 28, 2015, UPDATE: My response to Alliance One collection agency. Hilarious! Chief Electrical Inspector Stephen D. Thornton did as he said in his letter to me. On February 25th, I received an Alliance One account statement. My oh my, how people think they can open up an account in my name... Good grief! This stuff really is getting silly. Of course the account statement demanding payment did not have a name on it. Once again, no one wants to take responsibility. Now, it appears a corporation is violating my constitutionally protected rights. No individual is responsible for conducting themselves in a manner that is civilized and in compliance with our Supreme Laws of the Land.<br />
In the letter Stephen sent me, I quote, "All further inquiry regarding payment should be made to Alliance One at 1-800-456-8838." It appears Stephen does not want to talk to me about payment anymore. So, evidently he is not responsible anymore. Evidently, government employees "just doing their job" are not to be considered responsible for their actions and the injury that their actions produce. Only citizens are to be considered responsible for their actions. Government employees and people working for corporations are not responsible for their actions.<br />
I called up Alliance One and finally got a human representative on the phone. I gave her the account number, then she asked me for my Social Security number. I said I would not give that to her. Then she asked for my drivers license number. Wouldn't give that to her, either. Then I explained to her the fact that the fines are bogus and fly in the face of our Supreme Law of the Land. I started to tell her about my 1st Amendment right to publish a list of my skills and also about my right to a trial by jury before my liberty and property could be taken from me. She would not have any part of that discussion. "I am not here to argue with you," she said in a terse annoyed tone. And get this, she said, "You need to take it up with WDLI and not me!"<br />
I said, "WDLI told me to take it up with you," but she is the boss, and I must not annoy the boss... "I am going to hang up..." To which I gave her some choice last words before she could hang up. Obviously, I can't have a sensible conversation with idiots who refuse to take responsibility for their actions.<br />
I had to respond in writing to the Account Statement demanding payment. It appears that Alliance One picked some numbers out of the air and added to the fine. Assigned Interest: $258.48, and Other Fees or Charges: $148.70. Alliance One now claims that I owe them $907.18. That makes me laugh! Who do these people think they are? My goodness! I'd be ashamed of myself if I were doing what they do. So, here is the Alliance One statement:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgD6CwCnHeYhn0VVPtKTb7GAedZn7mCvv1OhtbwiTd_7HZnCdj90-zdNzhyphenhyphengADrvtuOE08VlAe6LmEnwMOd06g6tb_WkQzuXqn93W-YFV5hiDnkqA1WKcpghMx6u1pZthXPjdQLmgI4uLk/s1600/Alliance+One.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgD6CwCnHeYhn0VVPtKTb7GAedZn7mCvv1OhtbwiTd_7HZnCdj90-zdNzhyphenhyphengADrvtuOE08VlAe6LmEnwMOd06g6tb_WkQzuXqn93W-YFV5hiDnkqA1WKcpghMx6u1pZthXPjdQLmgI4uLk/s1600/Alliance+One.jpeg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
Here is my response:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">February 28, 2015</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">TO: Unnamed individual</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Alliance One</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> 6565 Kimbal Drive, Suite 200</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Gig Harbor, Washington 98335</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">FROM: Russ Hinds</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> 10421 E Jutte Lane</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Elk, WA 99009</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">SUBJECT: Account No. 32782297</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Dear unnamed individual,
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> As I am a individual who takes
responsibility for my actions, I correctly expect other individuals
to take responsibility for their actions. Please provide the name of
an official contact within your company who is taking responsibility
for collecting on the above invented bogus account which has been
wrongfully created within your company in order to unlawfully collect
an unlawful fine which Washington Department of Labor and Industries
illegally issued in complete disregard of our Supreme Law of the
Land. <br /> Please note that our state and federal constitutions
protect the right of citizens to publish a list of their skills.
Therefore, fining an individual $500.00 for posting an innocent flier
on a private bulletin board is an unconstitutional act that flies in
the face of our Supreme Law of the Land.
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Also note that attempting to
collect a fine without a conviction of a jury of good neighbors
violates our Supreme Laws of the Land. Depriving individuals of their
right to due process of law is strictly prohibited in our state and
federal constitutions.
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Simple... very simple. I am not
here to try and repeat your 6<sup>th</sup> grade civic lessons in
order to educate you to your civic duty to support and defend our
state and federal constitutions, however, I will remind you that our
American military servicemen and women have given much life, limb,
and treasure to defend our Supreme Laws of the Land against all
enemies foreign and domestic according to their sworn Oath. My father
and three of my sons have taken this oath and risked their lives in
service to this nation to preserve the God given rights of
individuals, such as you and I, which are protected in our state and
federal constitutions with the intent of being preserved for our
posterity. Please get a grip on yourself and take up your civic duty
to defend our Supreme Law of the Land.
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> With that being said, please
provide me with a name of the individual responsible for attempting
to collect on a bogus $500.00 fine, plus a bogus $258.48 in assigned
interest(???), plus bogus $148.70 in “other fees and charges.”
This great state and nation are founded upon individual
responsibility. We are, as good citizens, required to act in an open,
civilized, and courteous manner toward one another. When that fails
to happen, there are appropriate legal measures that must be taken.
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> I already have all of the names of
the government employees involved in depriving their neighbor(me) of
due process of law, however, I do not have the name of the individual
who sent me the enclosed Account Statement demanding payment. Please
provide the name so that I may be of assistance in providing the
facts of my case for his protection. Colluding with government
employees to undermine our Supreme Laws of the Land is the opposite
of the Rule of Law and detrimental to a civilized society of
intelligent and responsible individuals.
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sincerely,</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Russ Hinds enclosure</span></div>
<br />
<br />
Are there any intelligent responsible individuals on the planet? I think there are quite a few, however, they do not work for government and the corporations feeding off the government. I am still looking for government employees who know their 6th grade civics lessons...<br />
I will need to pass this on to my representatives in the state legislature for their amusement. I won't find many who are willing to defend our constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic... If they could only see how they are making themselves and others look like complete asses. It must be way too difficult for them to do their simple and clear civic duty! Think about it! They would rather do the wrong thing than do the simple and clear right thing! Isn't it way beyond embarrassing? Perhaps their ego is such that they simply cannot admit to making a mistake. I admit my mistakes, when I make them. But, I don't admit to bogus accusations from people bent on destroying our constitutional republic.<br />
Let the readers decide who is speaking from a foundation of truth and right, and who is trying desperately to defend unconstitutional abuse and provocations.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-50672198919271437922015-02-09T12:23:00.000-08:002015-02-10T18:28:45.151-08:00February 9, 2015, UPDATE: Got a response from WDLI Director Joel Sacks. There are 2 great things about this blog. First, it gives the reader a complete play by play reality of dealing with government employees after they trap you in their web of nonsense. This documented play by play shows exactly how government employees perform their duties apart from any consideration of our state and federal constitutions which protect our God given rights and liberties. Second, this blog zeros in on how differences in belief systems within the minds of individuals affect the operations of government toward the governed.<br />
The differences in belief systems between the "governors" and the "governed" also came to the forefront of political discussion in the 1600s, the 1700s, and the 1800s, prior to and after our Founding Fathers. During the Great Reformation and Renaissance, the printing press produced a great deal of writings which did profoundly change the way rulers governed their citizens. The Dark Ages gave way to the Renaissance.<br />
If you read the documents which were read by our founding fathers you can find writings that favor and support the power and word of the king over his citizens, and you can find documents that favor limiting the power of kings and his dictates over their citizens. Off the top of my head, I remember reading a document, or treatise, that portrayed a king as a "father" over the people-which then went on to say that the kings word was law because he cares about his subjects like a father cares for his children. Someone actually wrote that nonsense and believed it! Somehow, even when the king's edicts were immoral and criminal, his words carried the magic that required the citizens to believe them. Unfortunately, a lot of dupes fell for the magical and all powerful words and authority of the king. On the other hand, the treatises opposing the power of dictatorial kings won the day, and the Founding Fathers fashioned the U.S. Constitution as the foundation of what came to be the most free and prosperous country ever to exist upon the earth in known history.<br />
I am fascinated by this blog because it seems to be repeating the the debates of the Renaissance! The letter I received from the Director Joel Sacks absolutely demonstrates the truth of what I have just written. Imagine the arrogance of the established rulers of the Dark Ages. If you were a king, just imagine the arrogance required to assume that your word is law. Imagine being a king and expecting everyone to believe and go along with your words with respect and submission. Could you as a sensible and free American actually go along with such arrogance in deceiving yourself in the same way the Dark Age kings deceived themselves? I could not do that, but it seems the bureaucrats in Washington State government have the same mental aptitude as the silly corrupt kings which our forefathers fled and threw off during the American Revolutionary war.<br />
Let's do a contrast. Here are the last paragraphs of my letter to Dir. Joel Sacks:<br />
<br />
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">----My
defense, my arguments, and protests are all based on the factual
history of this USA and on the natural rights of man which are
protected in our Supreme Law of the Land. I am quite capable of
independent thought based in truth, common sense, and common decency
and based in OUR civic duty to uphold our state and federal
constitutions. Are you capable, or do you prefer to follow the
misguided crowd down the road to tyranny? <br /> The citation, fine,
and Account Statement billing me $500.00 are bogus and outside of
law. I have not been convicted of a crime by a jury of my good
neighbors. Your efforts to collect the fine are lawless acts in a
nation founded upon the Rule of Law. Ignoring the Supreme Law of the
Land is a lawless act and is still considered treason by those who
have given life, limb, and treasure to preserve our Supreme Law of
the Land for their posterity. <br /> Please withdraw your citations
and comply with our state and federal Constitutions. </span></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Sincerely, </span></span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Russ Hinds----</span></span></div>
<br />
I am delighted that my writing conforms to the writings of our Founding Fathers and the pamphleteers who wrote in opposition to all-powerful kings. Now, read and contrast the response I received from Dir. Joel Sacks:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimL4mMd37FI9Yvj4BQynes4ui1M0GIFlkehLYHzE6t97udpfj3jm3z1EbXET2hg2qFxLFrZOZ0yM7r9SAi65nlh6pkj7YHfE1j3l2N_CnRaE9eChpLs3Lmo802vNWyyWQuNGqncgjViDw/s1600/Director+response+WDLI.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimL4mMd37FI9Yvj4BQynes4ui1M0GIFlkehLYHzE6t97udpfj3jm3z1EbXET2hg2qFxLFrZOZ0yM7r9SAi65nlh6pkj7YHfE1j3l2N_CnRaE9eChpLs3Lmo802vNWyyWQuNGqncgjViDw/s1600/Director+response+WDLI.jpeg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
I hope the following comments dissecting the letter above expose our opposing beliefs which guide our thoughts and actions. You, the reader, must decide whose words are true and carry more weight. Hopefully, this exorcise, and this blog, inspires you to take action and repair or replace people in government who are failing to govern within the constraints of their charter, the Constitution of the State of Washington. Seek inspiration from our Declaration of Independence.<br />
First, the letter opens cordially, thanking me for the letter I sent to Dir. Joel Sacks. I appreciate the semblance of civility.<br />
Second, Joel Sacks asks Chief Electrical Inspector Stephen D. Thornton to write the response. Joel Sacks is a figurehead. He is not there to rock the boat, rather he is there to advise on issues after being briefed on the pros and cons of the issue by government employees and lobbyists. In this case, Sacks chose to avoid taking a stand and passed on the responsibility to CEI Thornton. Sacks takes an Oath of Office to support our state and federal constitutions. CEI Thornton does not take an Oath of Office and he is not a constitutional lawyer. He is simply a government employee with a background in the Electrical Field and business. <a href="http://www.lni.wa.gov/TradesLicensing/Electrical/files/currents/Elc1411.pdf">Electrical Currants </a><br />
Thornton will naturally tend to maintain the status quo, and he is just another obstacle in my path to get my grievance resolved according to our state and federal constitutions. Thornton does not have the gonads to approach Joel Sacks and tell him that he(Thornton) is not qualified to address the constitutional law I used to substantiate my grievance. Thornton should have given the task of responding to my letter back to Sacks advising him to get the proper legal advice from a constitutional lawyer, either on staff, in the private sector, or preferably both. HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MUCKING THINGS UP IN ORDER TO AVOID MAKING A CORRECT DECISION BASED ON OUR SIMPLE AND PLAIN STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS. According to what I learned in sixth grade government school, both Sacks and Thornton are not qualified to serve in their positions. Sacks should have been knowledgeable enough to get proper counsel. They are simply not interested in adhering to or standing up for our state and federal constitutions. In sixth grade, I learned that it is every citizen's civic duty to support our constitutions, and that includes government employees. --Those are minimum statements which do not take into account any DELIBERATE motives for disregarding our state and federal constitutions. It is my experience with government employees that makes me believe that they are just fearful and cowardly people going along with the crowd without sticking their neck out. They don't have the confidence to actually take a stand for their Oath of Office, therefore they seek every possible way to pass the buck and avoid taking responsibility for running the government according to the plain and simple words of our Supreme Laws of the Land. People like me who say that our rights protected in our constitutions are Supreme scare the heck out of government employees. And of course the government employees want the general public to be afraid of us, too. Just look at the methods used to demonize people who are standing up for our right to bear arms.<br />
Third, Thornton declines to waive the penalty for their citation based on his belief that it was issued for appropriate reasons, which is supported by another low rank government employee, Faith Jeffery. Obviously, these guys are just the "king's minions" going along with the dictates of the king. The kings of the Dark Ages avoided any discussion of morality and justice in the administration of their dictates. Thornton avoids any discussion of morality, justice, AND our Supreme Law of the Land while making the unsupported statement that the citation was "appropriate." He is "just doing his job." There are no government employees and very few legislators who will do their civic duty to support our state and federal constitutions. They prefer living in their world of nonsense ignoring the life, limb, and treasure given to defend our constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic. They live in a comfort zone of make believe.<br />
Fourth, Thornton makes the wild statement that I exorcised my "full due process right" and appealed the citation through 4 levels of judicial review. Truth is, I was never given any "due process rights." I purchased my right to appeal by paying $450.00 to request a "due process" trial by a jury of my good neighbors, who would do their civic duty to support our state and federal constitutions. My constitutionally protected right to a trial by jury was never granted to me by the king's minions. I advise Thornton and Sacks to read our Declaration of Independence before assuming that their words contain magic that will make me believe them. Sorry guys, I cannot lower myself to submitting to words pulled out of thin air and without any basis in simple truth. Cobbling words together on a piece of paper on your false assumption that they make sense does not cast a spell on me, nor pull the wool over my eyes. Obviously, I do not live in your world of nonsense and make believe, which is where the kings of the Dark Ages lived. I live in a world in which good men have given life, limb, and treasure to preserve the rights and liberties which are protected in our state and federal constitutions for our posterity.<br />
I have, once again, failed to find any responsible government employees who will do their civic duty to support and defend our state and federal constitutions. This is pitiful... I have worked very hard to educate and animate government employees to follow our Supreme Law of the Land.<br />
<br />
Let the reader judge for himself who is speaking the truth...<br />
<br />
One more thing. When a legislator contacts Joel Sacks about my grievance, they are spoken to in the same manner as Thornton's letter above. If the legislator is an average citizen mis-educated in a government school just like the rest of the government employees, then the words spoken in the same manner as found in Thornton's letter will likely suffice to pull the wool over the legislator's eyes... The legislator simply does not have the education that our founding fathers had, or even the basic education I have. They will fall for the bureaucrats' nonsense and lies. If the citizens of America cannot unite on our founding documents, then the enemies of America have won by successfully dividing and conquering. If government employees are not accountable to uphold and defend the rights protected in our constitutions, then there is nothing left that they are accountable to. Without the constitution, they are free to do anything they desire to do. For examples of things that unaccountable government does, look at the list of things in our Declaration of Independence. All across the land of the free and the home of the brave, government employees are doing the same things King George did prior to our Revolutionary War.<br />
Do you see what I see? How can we return to our state and federal constitutions? We are a people in need of an education. "My people perish for lack of knowledge."<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-47365786384837616462015-01-24T10:37:00.000-08:002015-01-25T06:44:34.263-08:00January 24, 2015, UPDATE: Some things need to be said. According to what I said in my last UPDATE, I once again notified all of the legislators in Olympia, WA, of my letter to WDLI Director Joel Sacks. This time I only received a few responses, much fewer than my previous mass email. Here is the email I sent:<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>SUBJECT: Director Joel Sacks of WDLI
MESSAGE:
Please find the letter to Director Joel Sacks in my latest UPDATE to my Blog:
---BLOG URL---
It is well understood that legislators who adhere to their Oath of Office will
inspire all government employees to do the same. The reverse is also true.
Legislators who disregard their Oath of Office will inspire all government
employees to disregard their civic duties.This really is basic 6th grade level
civics instruction, but unfortunately too much mental gymnastics has crept into
We the People's halls of government. It has become obvious that government
employees and lawyers have forgotten their civic duty and the principles of
constitutional government and somehow found a legitimate function of government
to be fining citizens $1500.00 for publishing a list of their skills in an
effort to innocently serve their neighbors.
I would like to help you correct this nonsense...
Sincerely, Russ Hinds
RESPONSE REQUESTED: Russ has requested a response to this message.</tt></pre>
<br />
Here is one of the responses from a legislator's assistant:<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>Dear Russ,
Thank you for contacting Senator So and So and for taking the time to share your
concerns. I will see to it that Senator So and So receives your e-mail message
this afternoon.
Sincerely,</tt></pre>
<br />
<br />
Here is another one from a senator himself:<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>Mr. Hinds,
Thank you for your e-mail. I appreciate your input and will review your blog
post.
All my best,
</tt></pre>
<div>
<tt><br /></tt></div>
Our representatives in Olympia are busy. They have a lot to do for the furtherance of government in the state of Washington. ....Hhhrrrummph... Um... We are not on the same page. Furthering government is not what We the People Need. We need to get government out of the way and get it to stop rewarding ignorance, irresponsibility, incompetence, etc with free stuff.<br />
My little problem is not on my representatives' priority list... and when they talk with their contact person in WDLI, that contact person assures the legislator that WDLI is functioning properly according to the law. After that, since the legislator has other pressing matters on his plate, he can move on to addressing the other matters. Somehow, no one in the legislature has the courtesy to get back with me to inform me of WDLI's position in the matter of fining people $1500.00 for looking for a job. Apparently, I am brushed off as a disgruntled kook, even a constitutionalist disgruntled kook. WDLI's contact person with the legislators is quite skilled at discrediting the complainant(me) and assuring the legislator that everything is hunky dory. THIS IS THE MESS WE HAVE CREATED WITH OUT OF CONTROL GOVERNMENT WHICH IS WAY OUT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESTRAINTS.<br />
Just as the simple truth can be buried under mountains of lies, inferences, nuances, and wrong assumptions, so can government employees bury their unconstitutional conduct in the "gray area" utilizing lies, inferences, nuances, and wrong assumptions. In my case, one disgruntled citizen is easily tossed aside as simply a nuisance. Once the legislator's concerns are satisfied by the WDLI contact person, the legislator can get back to "more serious matters" on his desk. Thus, the stand I have taken gets drawn out till the end of time.<br />
The only bright spot in this is the fact that my stand and my blog have exposed a lot of people in and out of government to an education in simple reality. --The "reality" of having state and federal constitutions which protect the natural God given rights of the governed and establish government to "protect and maintain individual rights" as stated in Article 1 of the Constitution of the State of Washington.<br />
Government is not established to punish the innocent for the benefit of the collective... And that is the subtle underlying "lie" used to justify more government interference in the everyday lives of the governed. "In order to protect the public, government must do this, and this, and that, and more of that..." "In order to protect the public, government must issue $1500.00 fines to people who publish a list of their skills and post them on a private bulletin board." UNDER THIS KIND OF REASONING GOVERNMENT EXPANDS WHILE LIBERTY AND JUSTICE DIMINISHES.<br />
UNDER THIS KIND OF REASONING, THE ESTABLISHED POWERS PLUNGED EUROPE INTO THE DARK AGES. Our founding fathers, their ancestors, and millions of immigrants fled the darkness and oppression in the totalitarian countries of Old Europe and all over the world. They came to America for freedom, liberty, opportunity, and justice where a man could earn a living among good neighbors and keep what he has earned. Note the inscription on the Statue of Liberty:<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #606060; font-family: Georgia, Utopia, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', serif; font-size: 20px; font-style: italic;">"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #606060; font-family: Georgia, Utopia, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', serif; font-size: 20px; font-style: italic;">With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #606060; font-family: Georgia, Utopia, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', serif; font-size: 20px; font-style: italic;">Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #606060; font-family: Georgia, Utopia, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', serif; font-size: 20px; font-style: italic;">The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #606060; font-family: Georgia, Utopia, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', serif; font-size: 20px; font-style: italic;">Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #606060; font-family: Georgia, Utopia, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', serif; font-size: 20px; font-style: italic;">I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"</span><br />
<br />
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp." ??? The pompousness of the establishment rulers merited a mention on the Statue of Liberty. How about that! Of course, in the "ancient lands," those who had the gold ruled. The resources and opportunites were locked up in the hands of the few. Only the kings and his hierarchy had any modicum of freedom and opportunity. And in Old Europe, the church worked with the kings to keep the serfs from rebelling. The pompous Roman Catholic Church propagandized on the side of kings while at the same time kept the serfs ignorant of the simple truth. The invention of the printing press and the translation of Scripture into the languages of the common man created the Renaissance and the founding of the USA. Those ARE the facts, ma'm.<br />
The rise of America can be attributed to 1. the vast resources(land) and opportunity (freedom) available on the American continent. And 2. the Biblical influence of churches and churchmen who established the colonies, the centers of education, and the governments of the states. It was number 2 that kept the USA from becoming just another vassal of corruption dominated by the power and wealth of Old Europe's kings and church. Mexico has had several revolutions, but the people of Mexico did not have Protestant "Open Bible" education available and widely accepted. The ruling elite managed to maintain their grip on the wealth and government of Mexico. Mexico's revolutions never amounted to much, but in the USA, the Old Europe ruling elite had a long difficult time overcoming the independence and the Biblical knowledge of liberty, morality, justice, and courage, taught in America's protestant churches and schools. America's churches established the tax funded free public schools, and scripture, prayer, and song were part of those public schools for over 100 years. The "melting pot" of the 19th and early 20th century American society, being dominated by Christian educated leaders in local and state government rightly desired that all children be given a basic education in reading writing, and arithmetic, AND THE STATED REASON FOR THIS WAS SO THAT THEY COULD READ THE SCRIPTURE FOR THEMSELVES. Reading scripture defines liberty, morality, responsibility, justice, mercy, courage, and "Love your neighbor" for the minds of upcoming generations. Take away those definitions from upcoming generations and you will have a population of ignorant serfs ready to be exploited, controlled, and commanded under a ruling authority.<br />
America's road to serfdom began in earnest in 1913 with the establishment of the Federal Reserve Banking System and the establishment of the income tax. With the world's Old Europe Bankers and America's newly created Industrial Revolution wealth (Robber Barons as they were known by the citizenry of the time) in control of America's banking and money printing, the world's wealthiest people could embark America on the road to serfdom and servitude. The "banksters" now had the power to build the government large enough to control the "serfs," whom they regarded as the laboring lower classes. Through taxes and "interest on loans and mortgages" taken from the labors of the common people, the world's richest could embark on their scheme for world dominance under their New World Order.<br />
In less than fifty years after 1913 (1963), they succeeded in removing scripture and prayer from America's schools --and the American taxpayer paid for it. Fifty years after that(2013), we have a nation of oblivious obedient slaves to work following orders in national and state governments which have deliberately and steadily grown to proportions that would astonish and grieve our founding fathers. NOW, HERE I AM TRYING TO COMMUNICATE ON A BASIS OF OUR FOUNDING DOCUMENTS AND FOUNDING PRINCIPLES OF LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL WITH GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHO DO NOT HAVE THE NATURAL DEFINITIONS OF LIBERTY, MORALITY, RESPONSIBILITY, JUSTICE, MERCY, COURAGE AND "LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR" WRITTEN IN THEIR HEARTS AND MINDS. The government employees, and over half of the U.S. population, have fallen for the lie that we need government to protect, control, and support people for their own good. The government employee paychecks demand that they maintain the current system...<br />
...And I am trying to reach them with ideas foreign to their understanding??? ...And I am speaking ideas that may lead to a lot of fear of losing their job by downsizing government... quite a shock to government employees, I am! The government employees prefer the road to serfdom because it secures their paycheck and our servitude to their benefits and pensions.<br />
Those at the top of government establishment position and power know what I am talking about. Those government employees at the low and middle levels of government follow orders and prefer not to think about or deal with things I am saying. We the People's representatives in the legislature have various levels of understanding. They run the gammit from "government is Savior" to "government is too big and out of control." Hence, the battle over ideas in the legislature. It results in "government by committee" where nothing can be accomplished according to a simple logical interpretation of our state and federal constitutions.<br />
Little ol' Russ Hinds cannot be allowed to get his citations resolved according to our state and federal constitutions, either. The "committee" will not agree, and it is too controversial and minor to give any serious time and effort to resolving. If little ol' Russ gets his issues resolved correctly, it might cause others to want the same and the whole house of cards might fall down. I believe it is that simple. My issue could have been constitutionally resolved in six weeks had they simply given me my constitutionally protected right to a trial by jury. But no, the bureaucracy must protect its tyranny. They must not allow a jury the opportunity to resolve my issue according to our natural God given rights which are protected in our state and federal constitutions. Little ol' Russ might be able to convince a jury of good neighbors to nullify the unconstitutional laws and citations. House of cards comes falling down again...<br />
It is looking more and more like we need some kind of huge crash of the system to wake people up to proper government based in liberty, justice, morality, and give-a-care about your neighbor. It makes me wonder if the banksters have deliberately lowered the price of oil and gasoline in order to relieve some of the stress on the American people and revive an American economy. Doing that would preserve the status-quo and further their agenda by calming down people like me who are beginning to wake up and attempt to correct out of control abusive government. If the economy and other things are going well for the American population, then blogs like this one won't generate much support and the government employees can continue with their so-called progress leading to the technocracy where every transaction between individuals is recorded and the "underground" free economy is destroyed.<br />
In a government of, for, and by We the people, we have been given a tool for We the People to govern ourselves. That tool is the trial by jury. That is where neighbors judge neighbors and they can judge the "king's" laws, as well. The trial by jury is one of the most essential and foundational rights of a free and just people. That is why the right to a trial by jury it is protected in our founding documents. It is wrong, unjust, and treasonous to deny your neighbor their right to a trial by jury. If We the People will not stand up for the right to a trial by jury, then the road to serfdom and ignorance is complete for our posterity. It breaks my heart... it crushes me to see what has become... I cannot fathom the apathy, ignorance, and blindness in the halls of our representatives as they gather in Olympia.<br />
<br />
In case there are some legislators who agree and understand what I am standing for, I will do another UPDATE which will provide the winning argument for limited constitutional government. ...Just in case there are some who love liberty and justice for all. I will do this before I go to Olympia. What a mess! I really want to go look these people in the eye and see if they can look me in the eye... <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-65753779002811386822015-01-20T07:17:00.000-08:002015-01-20T07:19:40.021-08:00January 20, 2015 UPDATE: Are government employees reading my blog? Correspondence with WDLI Director Joel Sacks. First, I did email all of the legislators, who happen to be gathered in Olympia for their 105 day session inventing new laws and other such nonsensical ways to waste the taxpayer's money. I am sure there is a lot of patting each other on the back over there in Olympia. Imagine the comradery of the legislators, the bureaucrats, and the government lawyers sucking up to each other attempting to get their programs expanded with more taxpayer funding. There comes a point when enough is enough, but few understand that. They have no concept of small government, like our founding fathers intended.<br />
Here is what I stated in my email:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Senator/Rep,</span><br />
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">You may find an interesting dose of reality in the last three UPDATES to my
blog:---</span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> ...BLOG URL...</span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
---I am still trying to get my $1500.00 citations for publishing a list of my
skills resolved according to our state constitution, --the documents that you
and many other government employees take an Oath of Office to support. It seems
many of my good neighbors who work for the gov. do not know what to do with me.
Perhaps they need your guidance and encouragement to uphold our state and
federal constitutions. The gov. employees at the lower levels who interface with
the public pretend to be helpless and uncertain of doing their civic duty to
uphold our Supreme Laws of the Land which do establish government to protect and
maintain individual rights, --Article 1, Section 1 of the WA State Constitution.
Thank you for adhering to your Oath and civic duty.
R. Hinds</span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> I received a few supportive responses from some of the legislators such as this one: </span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
</span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thanks for your email and your point of view. I believe too many people are
forgetting that we have a country and a rule of law. You hang in there stay
</span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">strong! </span></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Senator (So and so) </span></tt></pre>
<br />
I am glad there are a few people in the legislature who do see how far out of control government employees are. However, there is not enough unity and common correct understanding of our state and federal constitutions. Truth is, if they did go back to constitutional government, the change would be too drastic and scary for the weak minded. --Trusted and wise leaders with the vision of our founders in the legislature? Nope... It is pretty much each person for himself/herself in the legislature. The unity lies with those who see the government (and themselves) as the savior of We the People. The small government liberty minded legislators do not have the unity nor the ability to articulate the proper role of government to the "government is savior" crowd. That is why government keeps expanding out of control and outside constitutional restraints. We are in dire need of real statesmen for We the People who insist on supporting constitutional government.<br />
<div>
I think I'll make a trip to Olympia... They need to meet me in person. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Well, guess what? I got another Account Statement. This one is declaring that I owe $500.00 for the electrical citation and it contains another threat. If I fail to pay it, they will send a private collection agency after me to collect it. Have at it, boys and girls. I can talk straight with the private collection agency, as well. Will the private collection agency fall lockstep behind out of control government employees when given the full truth about their unconstitutional fines? If I were a private collection agency, I would not take the risk. Participating in extortion alongside ignorant government employees who are disregarding our Supreme Law of the Land might open them up for a lawsuit. </div>
<div>
In order to keep my communication with government employees up to date and in their face, I wrote a letter to the Director of Washington Department of Labor and Industries. He needs to know the facts. Truly, simply adhering to their Oath of Office would be much easier than playing games with me for over 3 years. Here is my letter to Dir. Joel Sacks:</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">January
19, 2015</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">TO:
Director Joel Sacks</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;"> Washington
State</span><br /> <span style="color: black;">Department
of Labor & Industries</span><br /> <span style="color: black;">P.O.
Box 44000</span><br /> <span style="color: black;">Olympia,
WA 98504-4000</span>
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">FROM: Russ
Hinds</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> 10421
E. Jutte Ln
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Elk,
WA 99009</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">RE:
Account Statement.</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Dear
Joel, <br /> Please find the enclosed copy of the Account Statement
sent to me in order to collect an unconstitutional fine of $500.00.
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> After
over three years of trying to communicate at a clear and simple 6<sup>th</sup>
grade level in order to remind my public servants of their civic duty
to support our state and federal constitutions, you and your
department ought to know that the citations and fines issued to me in
the course of mindlessly “just doing my job” are unconstitutional
and will not be given any consideration by me, Russ Hinds. <br /> It
has become completely obvious that government employees need an
education in the history of this great nation and the fact that lives
have been given to preserve and protect our constitutions from all
enemies foreign and domestic. I wish I could educate government
employees on our founding documents and the writings of the
Renaissance that inspired their creation, but I don't have space here
to do that for you. Here is a quote from a more recent wise
individual who did educate himself concerning reality, liberty, and
justice. Albert Einstein said, <span style="color: black;"><i>"A
foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of the truth."</i></span><i>
</i>
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;"></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"> Indeed,
scientists have shown that people will go to absurd lengths – and
engage in mental gymnastics – in order to cling to their belief in
what those in authority have said.</span><span style="color: black;"><i>
</i></span><span style="color: black;">In
fact, my Blog, </span><span style="color: black;"><i>Man
Fined $1500.00 for Looking for a Job</i></span><span style="color: black;">,
has clearly and simply shown the previous statement to be absolutely
true. The Blog shows it to be nearly impossible to animate government
employees with the ability to think independently from the crowd
gathered around the water coolers in government buildings. </span></span>
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"> My
defense, my arguments, and protests are all based on the factual
history of this USA and on the natural rights of man which are
protected in our Supreme Law of the Land. I am quite capable of
independent thought based in truth, common sense, and common decency
and based in OUR civic duty to uphold our state and federal
constitutions. Are you capable, or do you prefer to follow the
misguided crowd down the road to tyranny? <br /> The citation, fine,
and Account Statement billing me $500.00 are bogus and outside of
law. I have not been convicted of a crime by a jury of my good
neighbors. Your efforts to collect the fine are lawless acts in a
nation founded upon the Rule of Law. Ignoring the Supreme Law of the
Land is a lawless act and is still considered treason by those who
have given life, limb, and treasure to preserve our Supreme Law of
the Land for their posterity. <br /> Please withdraw your citations
and comply with our state and federal Constitutions. </span></span><br />
</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sincerely,</span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Russ Hinds </span>
</div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> Now I need to inform the legislators of this letter. It takes over 2 hours for me to do that through their email system, but it is necessary. When I visit them in person, hopefully they will have some idea of what is going on, and what has been going on for over 3 years. This is certainly not how government is supposed to work... </span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> I do hope I get the courtesy of a written response from Dir. Joel Sacks. I'll bet that he doesn't have the courage to respond to me in writing. I'll bet he will prefer to ignore my letter and pretend that I don't exist. He will likely let his subordinates handle it. They will drag it out till the end of time... Simple communication between good neighbors is not supposed to work this way... However, the government employees have marked me as some kind of enemy and threat to their system. They must prevail... </span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> Bullshit! They must get in line with our state and federal constitutions! </span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Here is the threatening Account Statement: </span><br />
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjR-blLY93a9s8deHbORxZT_26nyKoa1WuRLQ4_YAnKA5YDgIpeuSnJDNCEyBjSZ6H6qvpYSS-kCt2r7krS7OlfVySpdVIsrnHdrj6YKXTWbMVFJ3F3x4uqVMmuK3xrTEaFyc30L8hjK2A/s1600/Account+St+with+bill.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjR-blLY93a9s8deHbORxZT_26nyKoa1WuRLQ4_YAnKA5YDgIpeuSnJDNCEyBjSZ6H6qvpYSS-kCt2r7krS7OlfVySpdVIsrnHdrj6YKXTWbMVFJ3F3x4uqVMmuK3xrTEaFyc30L8hjK2A/s1600/Account+St+with+bill.jpeg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div>
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-56537694309118125512015-01-10T09:36:00.000-08:002015-01-10T18:14:31.946-08:00January 10, 2015, UPDATE: Went back to Spokane offices of Washington Dept. of Labor and Industries to visit Jeff Martin, Revenue Agent. On Friday, January 9, I paid a visit to the WDLI office in Spokane hoping to speak with Jeff Martin, Revenue Agent. Rather than having a sit down discussion of my supposed "Account," Jeff came out of his office to speak with me at the Receptionist counter. This was where I had the conversation with his partner in crime on December 30. I thought Jeff being named as my contact on the "Account Statement" would require a more thorough discussion and explanation in his office, or a small conference room. That did not occur. I take that to mean that I am not wanted in their offices. I am to be gotten rid of as quickly as possible. Last week, I understood being kept at the counter because the other revenue agent was not listed as my contact, but Jeff preferring to keep the meeting minimal and out of his office shows that he would prefer to stay out of my dispute with WDLI. His own words verify that,"Your account statement says that you owe zero. I have not been given any duty to collect on the account. Your account is still in appeal according to the statement. I am not involved."<br />
When Jeff came out, I introduced myself and informed Jeff that I wanted to show him that I am a human being, and I also wanted to see if he was a human desiring to be a good neighbor who does his civic duty to uphold our Supreme Law of the Land. Jeff said, "Yeah, it is good to be able to put a face to those we are corresponding with." Jeff was a nice enough fellow, but he seemed to be a little uncomfortable. I hope he realized that I did not put him in an uncomfortable position, his superiors did that. But, Jeff displayed no government employee arrogance, as is common with many government employees.<br />
I asked Jeff what he had found out would be the next thing WDLI is going to do to me. He had said on the phone before Christmas that he would find out and get get back to me. Obviously, he never called me back. Jeff said that my citations were still in appeal. He doesn't know what will happen until my case comes out of appeal and is given to him with instructions. He is stalling and pushing responsibility off of himself and up the chain of command. This is common practice for government employees. They always dodge responsibility as quickly as possible. We have seen this throughout my blog. They blame the statute, the legislature, their job, but no government employee wants to stick their neck out and take a stand on upholding our state and federal constitutions.<br />
I told Jeff that I am there because it is my desire to have these citations resolved according to our Supreme Law of the Land. I said that I don't want my citations put in a never-never land on the bottom of a stack of files somewhere. If it is buried and kept buried, it will never be resolved according to our state and federal constitutions. Resolving issues according to our constitutions by striking down the unconstitutional citations or a trial by a jury of good neighbors is the last thing WDLI employees at the top want. Everything they have done, which is recorded in this blog, proves that they do not want any discussion or consideration of our state and federal constitutions. Divert, delay, and dodge are standard procedure for government employees. Every person minding his own business and attempting to scratch out a living needs to know what to expect when they get ensnared in the government's web of accusations and procedures...<br />
I told Jeff that he needs to know what is going on so that he can stand up to his superiors according to our Supreme Law of the Land. "Jeff, I was told in my appeal hearing that I could not paint a windowsill for a neighbor without first having a contractor's license. They said I could get a shovel and pick up dog poop in the yard, but I couldn't paint a window sill."<br />
Jeff said, "Yeah, but you could not stick the shovel in the sod and dig up the lawn without having a landscape license."<br />
WTF?... "Hasn't the pendulum swung way out of bounds? Isn't that crazy? I am trying to educate government employees. That is why I am here and that is why I have a blog. Do you know that a government employee lied to my father over the phone. He claimed to be a client who wanted me to finish remodeling his dad's bedroom..." <br />
"Yeah, I read your blog.."<br />
Hallelujah!!! Right on! Then we talked a little more about ethics in government employees and some more about good neighbors upholding our state and federal constitutions. Other people standing and waiting at the receptionist counter got to hear a lot of good stuff! Jeff could not do much more than agree with me. He had read my blog and he knew that I had already gone to the legislature, and my state representative had even filed a "Helping the Local Handyman Bill," so Jeff knew that he could not divert me by saying, "You need to take it up with the legislature." I would have said emphatically in front of everybody, "I did already do that and they are working a getting a handyman bill passed." LOL! I like taking away their diversions!<br />
This is not the way government is supposed to work... Government today is an assault on the public, and not a public servant. I have been through three years of nonsense. Assaulted by a pack of government employees trying to convince me that I am a bad neighbor who deserves to pay the government employees $1500.00 for hanging a flyer on a private bulletin board. It reminds me of children in daycare trying to be boss over other children in daycare... Or the rich kid clique in high school trying to bully the poor kids in high school. I think some government employees need to grow up and accept the fact that we do have state and federal constitutions which are fought and died for. It is time to put government employees back under the constraints of our constitutions. Perhaps even get rid of about two thirds of the government employees. According to our state constitution, government employees exist to protect and maintain individual rights. It is disgusting to encounter adults acting like children by pretending that they are abiding by our Supreme Law of the Land. I stopped playing "pretend" when I was in elementary school...<br />
Jeff insisted that he is out of the picture because the Account Statement says zero. I thanked him for his attention and bid goodbye, leaving Jeff to carry on pretending that he is supporting and defending our state and federal constitutions.<br />
I'll need to update my representatives. The bureaucracies which they have created are creating nightmares for the public whom they are supposed to be serving... The public are beating their head against bureaucratic walls when the representatives ought to be beating the bureaucracies over the head with with our state and federal constitutions. ...It is a lot easier to run a constitutional government. Out of control government is impossible to manage... Good grief! Get a clue!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-14508151073480444252014-12-31T11:29:00.001-08:002015-01-02T06:29:07.946-08:00December 31, 2014, UPDATE: Visited the office of Washington Department of Labor and Industries in Spokane. Yesterday, I went to the WDLI offices in Spokane to visit with Jeff Martin. Jeff was out of the office until after the 5th of January, but I did get to visit with his partner in crime. There are at least 2 Revenue Agents stationed in Spokane. Very nice neighbor. I was politely greeted and a neighborly conversation was allowed to occur. I started by asking what did Jeff find would likely be the next steps of WDLI in pursuing their citations against me. I pointed out that the letters with the citations include several threats, and one letter names my "household" in the threats. Obviously, threatening my mother creates a lot of anger in my heart and mind.<br />
After showing the revenue agent a copy of my flyer, she asked the question, "Are you a licensed contractor?" ...pause... I have to pause here because I do not see the relevancy of the question. Somehow the government employee thinks it is relevant. Somehow the government employee thinks that you need to have a license before you can publish a list of your skills in order to serve your good neighbors. Here we go... now we get into a conversation where I must destroy all the fallacies that have been pumped into this government employee's head. She is going to rattle through all of the government's justifications for issuing me the citations... This is nuts! Evidently, these government employees are not capable of an independent, moral, and just reasoning process. The best they can do is repeat the justifications that have been given to them by their "superiors."<br />
While keeping a pleasant demeanor, I asked her, "Does it say on my flyer that I am a licensed contractor?" I do not need to have a license to do work for my neighbors. According to the constitution, I have a right to publish a list of my skills. She responded that the constitution does not apply to state laws, to which I replied, "I was surprised to find that the Washington State Constitution says that the U.S. Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. No matter what your government lawyers say, supreme still means supreme! And government employees still take an Oath of Office to support our Supreme Law of the Land." That shut her down on that. She begins to realize that she is not going to convince me, nevertheless that does not stop her from trying.<br />
Do I need to list all of her straw man scenarios designed to put fear in me as I work with good neighbors without having a license from the state to do so? They are all same... designed to make me think that I need the government to protect me from my neighbors and protect my neighbors from me.<br />
1. <i>There are crooked apartment owners who look for unlicensed people to repair their apartments, and then they tell the service provider that they are dissatisfied with the work done and will not pay. They know that the unlicensed repairman cannot go to WDLI to force compensation for work done because he is not licensed. Therefore, I need to be in the system so that I can get WDLI to force the crooked apartment owner to pay me. She said these crooks scour Craigslist looking for people who do not publish their license numbers. </i><br />
Answer: WOW! Everybody is a criminal in the minds of government employees... And since government employees are good guys, they are the ones who can save you... So, because there are bad apartment owners, I need to be fined $1500.00 for hanging a flyer on a bulletin board??? How the hell does that compute in her mind? "Well, it seems to me that we have civil courts and small claims courts to use to force crooks to pay for services rendered."<br />
<br />
2. <i>She gave an example of a woman who needed her septic system repaired. She hired an unlicensed guy to install a new septic system in her backyard. The system they installed did not work and they tore up her yard and she was unable to recoup damages because the guy was not licensed and bonded. WDLI could not help her because she hired an unlicensed contractor. She could not recoup from the bondsman because the contractor was not bonded. She noticed that I am a man of principle and that I would want insurance for my mistakes to protect my customers. </i><br />
Answer: So, because there are bad service providers out there, I need to be fined $1500.00 for hanging a flyer on a bulletin board? How does that compute in her mind? Well, it seems to me that we have civil courts and small claims courts to use to force crooks to pay for damages created." Once again, everyone is a criminal and government employees are the good guys<br />
<br />
What is going on here? Is she trying to put me under the spell she is under? She wants me to participate in her system because her salary depends on it, and she is the good guy. She is blind to the fact that BAD GUYS attempt to extort $1500.00 from people who publish a list of their skills and post them on a bulletin board.<br />
<br />
3. <i>Fairness. Here she brings up the downturn in the economy and WDLI started receiving complaints from their licensed contractors who were losing work supposedly because unlicensed contractors were coming from Idaho and Montana and competing for work with lower bids because they were unfairly without the burden of complying with WDLI regulations. WDLI needed to crack down on the "underground economy." </i><br />
Answer: Good grief! "Underground economy" is just another scare word. It is bad... I reminded her that the Soviet Union had a centralized economy and 25 million people starved to death. If it wasn't for the underground economy, 50 million people might have starved to death. The underground economy is a good thing. People doing things without government interference is a good thing. If licensed contractors are complaining about unfair regulations and unfair competition, then they ought to change the regulations. Let people do what they want to do. If I want to hire my neighbor to help me build a garage, I may choose which ever neighbor I want to choose, and then work together as good neighbors without government employee interference... If he screws me over, I can take him to court. If I screw him over, he can take me to court. Gee, I am not falling under her spell...<br />
<br />
We went on to discuss the moral foundations of law, and how government lawyers apply law and interpret law to benefit government. There is no moral foundation for fining me $1500.00 for hanging a flyer on a bulletin board. I told her that one of my goals was to educate government employees, and that I appreciate her willingness to listen to me. I said the pendulum has swung too far and the little guys like her need to be equipped to stand up to their misguided "superiors." 30 years ago, no government employee would have had the audacity to issue $1500.00 fines to my father, and my father would not have put up with it. He would have punched the government employee in the nose. Why do you think I should put up with it? <br />
I succeeded in giving her a lot to think about. However, I have reconsidered my request that all government employees be given training in our state and federal constitutions and the history surrounding those constitutions. It is now obvious that training in constitutional government would be insufficient. From the above, and from all the rest of my experiences with government employees, THEY NEED TO BE TAUGHT HOW TO REASON CORRECTLY ON THE BASIS OF MORAL AND RIGHT CONDUCT TOWARD YOUR NEIGHBOR. They fall for the nonsense coming down from their "superiors." The government employees at the bottom carrying out the orders from above simply shove aside any and all conviction that comes from the fact that their good neighbors would not do to them what their superiors are asking them to do to their good neighbors. These low level minions collecting their government paychecks NEED TRAINING IN MORAL VALUES FOUNDED IN LOVING YOUR NEIGHBOR AND DOING THE RIGHT THING INDEPENDENT OF ALL THE FALSE AND FLIMSY JUSTIFICATIONS CITED BY THEIR SUPERIORS FOR MORE AND EXPANDING GOVERNMENT POWER AND CONTROL. They need to be unbrainwashed... and that would be hard to do since their paychecks, their means of taking care of themselves, depends on them following orders from their superiors.<br />
What a mess. I could not do what they do. I would quit, and my superiors would be glad I quit. They would easily find a low IQ replacement for me. Looks to me like it is going to take some bad shit hitting the fan before America is to return to a moral constitutional republic with liberty and justice for all.<br />
I pray that this blog is educating some people... Geeze... and then you have the whining contractors begging the government to protect them from people who simply want to serve their neighbors. How low will America go? Shame, shame, shame... Where is integrity, dignity, independence, and a desire for honesty, simplicity, and friendly communities? Where? Where are those things? They certainly are not found being taught in government schools... Excuse me. I am done. I need to go throw up now...<br />
<br />
<b>EDIT:</b> Oh, while I was throwing up I remembered one other funny thing that the revenue agent said. While talking about needing to be bonded she mention that she herself had hired a contractor to remodel her bathroom. When it was done the lights blinked off and on again randomly. The plumbing in the shower leaked and she has not been able to take a shower in her new bathroom. She said that she was glad she used a licensed contractor because his being bonded and insured will make it right--- then she paused and second to think and asked herself why the remodel wasn't done correctly in the first place. ----then she answered her own question, as if expecting me to be saying what she was saying... "the contractor probably sent over an employee who did not know how to do the work properly..." I looked at her kind of puzzled, but moved on to another point. LOL! I guess I was having an effect. Good reasoning that cannot be argued with must have flustered her a little. Oh well!<br />
It must be said that "We the people should not have to educate and unbrainwash government employees every time we encounter them 'just doing their job.'" They should be able to think and reason in terms of common sense, common decency, and good neighbors prior to getting their government job. They can't just fine people $1500.00 without a conviction by a jury of good neighbors. That is what our constitutions say... Good grief!<br />
<br />
Due to the fact that I know history, and also have colorful relatives and ancestors, I was amused with the business card that I picked up at the WDLI office in Spokane. Seems they really do have a position titled "Revenue Agent." In the 1920's my Missouri backwoods grandpa was a child. It was during Prohibition. Grandpa was posted down the road from the moonshine still to watch out for "revenuers." LOL! That cracks me up. I cannot imagine carrying around a business card that says "Revenue Agent." It is also amusing to me that the backwoods Missourians were smarter than today's supposedly educated population. The backwoods moonshiners resisted government interference and extortion, too. I just bring that up because it tickles me. I do know that distilling liquor in improperly constructed stills can poison and and kill people. My great grandpa's still never poisoned or killed anyone. If it did, grandpa said it would have killed him and my great grandpa, and grandma, and aunts, uncles... They drank their own White Lightin', too. LOL! ...Must have been fun outsmarting the revenuers back then. I love adventure!<br />
Anyway, from my perspective and upbringing I would be embarrassed carrying around a business card that says, "Revenue Agent." Perhaps other people just don't know any better... LOL!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIINoM_2eQ-kzGoigGgQ41P1c5kZPmvsM3OehOlY_Vj7hIwgSKbz8-qJfzvJfQJr0_cfFLB3tfMs1YGOEAQj-suy5aGe1q-2nOWJP8zakJt11lNxKv6e5PI8PjUUgthyphenhyphen2fQuRvRr8dMsg/s1600/revenue+agent.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIINoM_2eQ-kzGoigGgQ41P1c5kZPmvsM3OehOlY_Vj7hIwgSKbz8-qJfzvJfQJr0_cfFLB3tfMs1YGOEAQj-suy5aGe1q-2nOWJP8zakJt11lNxKv6e5PI8PjUUgthyphenhyphen2fQuRvRr8dMsg/s1600/revenue+agent.jpeg" height="169" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-76108615028751464712014-12-13T08:33:00.001-08:002014-12-13T18:12:35.548-08:00December 13, 2014 UPDATE: Conversation with government employee... On Monday, Dec. 8, I finally talked with Jeff Martin on the phone about the Account Statement mentioned in my previous UPDATE. I introduced myself and informed him that I am looking for government employees who know how to be good neighbors that uphold our state and federal constitutions. Then I gave him the Customer Number which is referenced on the Account Statement. I also reminded him of the messages he left on my answering machine. Jeff was polite and willing to discuss my concerns and answer questions. I asked Jeff why my fines were still in Appeal, since my appeals ended months ago. I asked if Labor and Industries had put me in suspension in order to avoid resolving my protests according to our constitutions. He could not answer that, but he said that he would research it.<br />
Our conversation lasted a good 15 minutes as I reiterated many of the points that I have made in this blog. The first point being that the constitution protects my right to publish a list of my skills. Jeff responded with the fact that the constitution applies to the federal government and the states are free to execute their own laws. I pointed out that my sons and my father did not serve in war in order that states can fine American citizens $1500.00 for hanging a flier on a bulletin board. Jeff tried to argue that I was demeaning the sacrifices of soldiers by applying their service to my fines, as if my protests were too petty and the fines too miniscual to fall under the sacrifices of life and limb. WOW! He thought that I was demeaning their sacrifice and service to our country! Evidently, Jeff could not see that he had it exactly backwards. Labor and Industries demeans the service of our soldiers by issuing outrageous fines for innocent activity. Hmm... I am beginning to get confirmation of my belief that government employees have strange and backward thinking and reasoning which they use to justify government outside constitutional restraints.<br />
I also pointed out that the Washington State Constitution says that governments exist to protect and maintain individual rights. His job exists to protect and maintain individual rights and the Washington State Constitution says that the U.S. Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. Then, Jeff took the tact that unfortunately we do not live in a moral society anymore and that he had seen many elderly people damaged by unlicensed contractors. My response, "Oh, Jeff, are you accusing me of being a danger to my neighbors? If you are, then you need to prove that to a jury of my good neighbors before you fine me $1500.00." I said, "Go after the bad guys. You cannot protect the innocent by punishing the innocent."<br />
Jeff had fallen for the belief that government needs to control everything in order to protect everyone. This is how government employees and attorneys justify all that they do. They convince themselves they are the good guys, even to the point of preventing people from painting a window sill for their neighbor for a dollar. Then, Jeff brought up the "gray areas" of the law. I said, "Yes, government attorneys expand the application of law beyond reason and common decency in order to issue fines and collect revenue. If the law is in a 'gray area,' it is best to err on the side of the constitution, rather than err on the side of abusive application of law."<br />
Jeff again lamented that we do not live in a moral society and we need government to protect people. He said that our constitutions are not sufficient to deal with today's society. I brought up John Adam's quote, "This constitution is written for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the governance of any other." I said, "Therefore, when I find my government employees acting immorally, I am going to stand against it. When government employees try to shove a corn cob up my ass, I am going to stand against it!" I told Jeff that they have gotten their hooks into a guy who has been standing up to government employees for 20 years. I mentioned the government schools dumbing down generation after generation and Jeff said that he would not send his children to government schools. Wow! I said that he and I would get along very well as friends without government interference. I said that government needs good people in its employ. I said that most government employees are just trying to do a good job and justify their job in their own minds, --but that I do believe that there is corruption and evil at the top of government. I think the idiots at the top saw a need to raise revenue for their operating budget and they saw stretching their administrative law to include fining the general public on the basis of vague interpretation of law.<br />
I was simply trying to educate a government employee. Jeff could not defeat my arguments. He knows what I am saying is true, but these guys like him need to be shocked out of their "go along with the crowd of government employees" in order to collect a paycheck. I told Jeff that I simply could not do what he does to his neighbors. I could not participate in fining people $1500.00 for innocently hanging a flier on a bulletin board. My conscience would not allow it. I could not look a neighbor in the eye and tell him that he is a bad neighbor who owes the government employees $1500.00 for hanging a flier on a bulletin board. Good grief!!!<br />
The moral to this story is that "government employees and I simply have different beliefs and that we are basing our actions on those differing beliefs." Jeff bases his actions on the belief that government must protect the innocent by fining the innocent. I believe that that is preposterous and delusional. It is a false justification for more government power and control which is outside of constitutional restraints. The truth is, "the government is full of people who see themselves as the saviors needing to protect the population." It is natural for man to want a positive self image, but government employees are not looking correctly at reality. They are public servants, not saviors. They are to maintain individual rights, not punish the innocent in order to save the innocent. Government does not exist to insert itself into every transaction and agreement between individuals. I do not need to have government permission to serve my neighbors. I do not need government approval before I purchase or sell a firearm. I do not need government approval to hang a flier on a bulletin board, or publish a truthful list of my skills.<br />
Government employees like Jeff can be educated. Jeff knows that I would not and could not do to him what he is participating in doing to me. The thing is, Jeff, and the rest of the government employees should have been educated properly in the government schools. But, they were not. They are not equipped to stand on the founding principles of this nation. Fifty years of failing and worsening government schools has bought us to this state of out of control government and bureaucracies. And also brought us to half of the population being dependent on government,--dependent on their neighbors' taxes for welfare and a government employee paycheck.<br />
All I can do is do my best to educate...<br />
Jeff said that he would find out for me what is going to happen to me next. What are my government employees going to do to me next in executing their fines? Jeff said he would call me back, but he has not done so, yet. Perhaps I will need to call him again.Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-14626248794970021392014-11-27T11:10:00.004-08:002014-11-28T18:03:18.379-08:00November 27, 2014 UPDATE: I got a big uplift this week...Labor and Industries sent me an Account Statement, LOL! The turkey is in the smoker! And I need something to do to keep me entertained. So, I'll update this blog because I am still giggling over more silly stuff from government employees. HAPPY THANKSGIVING!<br />
Last week I received an Account Statement from Washington Department of Labor and Industries. Boy, I was starting to feel lonely and forgotten! So, I eagerly opened the envelope and found this:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1sqYGMXnEilpJRrgWDGZEv3lt2zZqbLIhNjkZYfMJIAAL2Kbehw7aHlDF2m_tsl7OaQqwgYJeK7Qj-FS2eLB6NTCB7mK04-UpDkrL0GlDbOhhyjQB5Gkh8ttnI0uRdS0L57p2eS9zrxU/s1600/lni+account+statement.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1sqYGMXnEilpJRrgWDGZEv3lt2zZqbLIhNjkZYfMJIAAL2Kbehw7aHlDF2m_tsl7OaQqwgYJeK7Qj-FS2eLB6NTCB7mK04-UpDkrL0GlDbOhhyjQB5Gkh8ttnI0uRdS0L57p2eS9zrxU/s1600/lni+account+statement.jpeg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div>
<br />
The first column is "Debt Type." In that column is "SCS - Contractor Infractions TICKET # NTHRM00462." The second (green) column is "Balance," and it says $1000.00. The third (white) column is Amount in Appeal and it says $1000.00. The fourth (green) column is Total Due Now, and it says $.00. WOW! The account is not due! I have just been told that I do not owe WDLI $1000.00 because it is still disputed in APPEAL.<br />
I wonder why I was sent this... Is it just a computer generated mailing, or did someone at WDLI read my blog where I pointed out that I have not received any correspondence withdrawing the fines?I have to wonder about these things because it is difficult to follow government employees as they go through their administrative procedures. I like to know why they do what they do, but most of the time what they do doesn't make any sense. And neither does this Statement make any sense. My APPEALS have ended and I was determined by Judge Sypolt and Judge Mareno to be owing the $1500.00 in fines. My APPEAL to the Washington State Court of Appeals did not go through because the Washington State Supreme Court denied my Request for Waiver of Fees. And I was not about to give them any more of my money! Hmmm... What is up?<br />
The Account Statement had this written on it: "If you have any questions on the items listed on the statement, please contact Jeff Martin at (509) 324-2599 and provide the following customer number: 481733"<br />
Naturally, I had questions, so I called Jeff and left a message because he was not in his office. Later, I found 2 messages on my answering machine. The first one was a drab statement while he entered the Customer Number into his ccomputer Jeff said that I "owe $1000.00 and $500.00 electrical." He gave me his number so that I could call him back.<br />
The second message on my answering machine wasn't as drab and monotonous. He seemed a little excited to inform me that I do not owe any money to WDLI. Jeff said that the account is in "suspension" because of "protest" and "appeal." His exact words were, "...in suspension due to protest and appeal." Man, what does that mean?<br />
I giggled all day yesterday after I tried to call him back. He is out of the office until Monday, the 1st of October. Is "suspension" where they have decided to put me rather than resolving the issue according to our Supreme Law of the Land? Did the government employees invent a new rule for themselves to follow in order to avoid the black and white Supreme Law of the Land? Just like I have said previously in this blog, the government employees do not want to deal with me anymore. They cannot stand applying their Administrative Procedures according to our Supreme Law of the Land, therefore, they must avoid discussion of the Supreme Law of the Land. Here are my winning points of my defense which these government employees refuse to acknowledge:<br />
1. The Washington State Constitution says, "[governments], are established to protect and maintain individual rights."<br />
2. The Washington State Constitution says, "The Constitution of the United States is the Supreme Law of the Land." That includes the Bill of Rights, my right to publish a list of my skills, and my right to a speedy trial by jury before my liberty and property can be taken from me by government employees.<br />
3. The Washington State Constitution says, "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, and property without due process of law." Due process of law includes a speedy trial by a jury of good neighbors who do their civic duty to support our Supreme Law of the Land just as our servicemen sacrifice life and limb to defend our constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic.<br />
4. The Washington State Constitution says, "Justice in all cases shall be administered openly and without unnecessary delay."<br />
I have won my argument with government employees. They are acting outside constitutional restraints and they know that. They have slipped comfortably into gray areas and pushed their outrageous RCWs beyond "Maintaining individual rights." They need the epiphany back to reality, but they would rather put me in "suspension" in order to fail administering justice "openly," and avoid resolving the dispute according to our Supreme Law of the Land.<br />
Until we have an open discussion with the intent of abiding by our state and federal constitutions, EVERYTHING these government employees do will be wrong according to our state and federal constitutions. They know I am right and they know the Oath of Office they took, but no one has the courage and integrity to do the right thing. If they want to convince me that I am a bad neighbor who owes the government employees $1500.00, then they need to get a conviction from a jury of my good neighbors. And all of the good neighbors I know DO expect government employees to abide by our state and federal constitutions.<br />
It amazes me how deep a hole the government employees, including our legislators, have dug for themselves. It is a very deep hole in which government employees have been acting and performing in their "gray areas" well outside constitutional restraints. It has taken over 50 years to incrementally get where we are with out of control government employees, but shining the light of the black and white Supreme Law of the Land on government employees removes the gray areas and exposes their folly.<br />
In the state of Washington is a group of people who are standing up for their God given constitutionally protected right to own and trade guns without third party government interference. The gentleman, Gavin Siem, has a campaign which states "I will not comply;" meaning that We the People are not going to comply with laws that are unconstitutional. There are open protests being organized here in the state of Washington to defy the unconstitutional I594 law which restricts gun purchasing, trading, loaning, and gifting. "I will not comply."<br />
I have amused myself as a result of going through all the things recorded in this blog by thinking about forming a protest group in opposition to Gavin Siem's campaign. I should form a group of government employees to counter Siem's protests. Perhaps, "Government employees against Gavin Siem" would be a good name for an opposition organization. We could form different branches of opposition to Gavin Siem. How about "Judges and lawyers against Gavin Siem," and "Code Enforcers and Revenue Collectors Against Gavin Siem?" These groups of government employees could show up at Gavin Siem's protest events holding signs that say, "I will not comply with our Supreme Law of the Land." Wouldn't that be great? As you can see from my experience, that is exactly what government employees are doing. The government employees want We the People to comply with all their thousands of pages of rules, procedures, statutes, and fees, but the government employees won't comply with our duly ratified state and federal constitutions!<br />
Perhaps I will show up to one of the "I will not comply" events and set up a table across the street from Gavin Siem. I shall have signs saying, "Government employees for 'I will not comply with state and federal constitutions.'" "Judges and lawyers for 'I will not comply with our state and federal constitutions.'" I'll put clipboards on my table and attempt to recruit government employees into joining the opposition against Gavin Siem. Perhaps the government employee pension managers will sign up for "I will not comply with our state and federal constitutions." According to my blog experience, I should be able to collect a lot of signatures and support for my groups in opposition to Gavin Siem!<br />
See how government employee nonsense and disregard of our state and federal constitutions has gone beyond the pale....?<br />
I'll call Jeff back next week and see what WDLI wants to do to resolve my dispute according to our Supreme Law of the Land. Perhaps Jeff Martin knows that there is much more joy found in being a good neighbor who does his civic duty to support our Supreme Law of the Land. I hope so! We need government employees who know how to be good neighbors doing their civic duty to support our state and federal constitutions.<br />
<br />
Again, HAPPY THANKSGIVING! ...I'm still giggling at this nonsense!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-67517935295964745872014-11-06T07:48:00.001-08:002014-11-06T07:48:43.315-08:00November 6, 2014, UPDATE: Election over, now what? I gave it a break for a month before the election. My state representatives would be preoccupied with getting elected, so I didn't bother them. Now, what do I do? Shall I continue to press for a constitutional resolution to my $1500.00 fines for hanging a flier on a private bulletin board? I do have time to be a pest, and it doesn't require a lot of money to educate my state representatives. So, yes. I will press on. I really want our state and federal constitutions upheld. Plus, it is quite amusing to make them squirm.<br />
The only way things will get better is when people demand that they get better. The government employees prefer that their unconstitutional action remain under the radar and uncontested. Screw them! They need to learn how to be good neighbors who do their civic duty to uphold our Supreme Law of the Land. They need to get a grip on reality and stop with the kindergarten con games... And gee whiz! Who would have thunk all of the conning, and bullying, and outright lies would come from our neighbors who are OUR government employees?<br /> This blog is not finished. Idiocy is on display and it needs to called out. Please continue to check back for UPDATES...Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3225184487620318298.post-66028940200920647432014-10-04T10:40:00.000-07:002014-10-05T07:13:37.672-07:00October 4, 2014, UPDATE: Real People in the legislature... On September 23, 2014, I emailed every member of the Washington state legislature. The email was short and simple:<br />
<br />
<i><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"You should check out the latest UPDATE to my blog. The blog is coming out from under the radar...</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> </span></i><br />
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<i><span style="color: windowtext; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">>>>>blog url<<<<</span> </i></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<i>Thank you for adhering to your Oath of Office."</i></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText">
Happily, I received a few responses from the legislature. One of them was particularly good. <br />
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<i>Hi Russ,</i></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<i>Thank you for your email. I read your blog, and (albeit I am VERY new here) I can understand both sides. Sometimes legislators feel they have their hands tied during session, and can only sneak little amendments past the majority party. Without people like you to tell us, I’m not sure we would have any idea what to change—it’s easy for us to research policy all day and want to overhaul an entire tax system, but the little policy flaws that create a big problem in the lives of Spokane citizens seem to totally escape us without anyone complaining to us. You’re right—there is a disconnect, but I appreciate you pointing out that [Rep/Sen. *******] lives his life to close that gap.</i></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<i>That said, I always welcome comments, complaints, regrets, remorse…anything! I see that you live in D7, but if you’d ever like to discuss policy, I would love to hear from you! Please feel free to call or email me directly anytime.</i><i> </i></div>
<div class="MsoPlainText" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<i>Take care,</i></div>
<br />
This email from a legislative assistant shows a great deal of information. See? There are a lot of "Real People" out there who want to do the right thing. He/she "understands both sides," but obviously is not firmly convicted upon which side to stand. [He] sees that the $1500.00 in fines imposed are excessive and may violate "freedom of speech," and freedom to work, however, [he] "sees" that the government needs to "protect" the people from "unlicensed" service providers(electricians, contractors). This person is simply a Real Person who wants to do the right thing, but [he] is unable to put the facts together in such a way as to firmly determine what the right thing to do is. [He] has not examined closely what the role of government is, and what consequences will follow when government operates outside the role that is given to it in our state and federal constitutions. How does this person satisfy his desire to do the right thing?<br />
<div>
Well, lacking the foundation and facts surrounding the proper role of government, [he] is likely to base his final decision on his emotions, the desire to believe that government exists to "protect" individuals, or APPEAR to protect individuals. [He] will probably overlook the fact that in their effort to protect individuals, the government has HARMED and INJURED an individual by restricting his liberties and fining him $1500.00 without a speedy trial by jury. Emotion based actions most often lead to contradictions, and most people do not like to acknowledge their contradictions and hypocrisy. When they are pointed out, their pride and ego gets very defensive.<br />
In my simple case, a contradiction is also easily pointed out in that electrical repairs (and other work) are performed by unlicensed technicians in apartment home maintenance and even government building maintenance. Why aren't government employees in maintenance positions fined $1500.00 for publishing a list of their skills in their resume`s? And the same for apartment maintenance technicians? The simple answer is, sophomoric government employees and self promoting lawmakers do not think things through. They want to be heroes protecting the public without being scrutinized for their nonsense and unworkable unconstitutional legislation. Pointing out this contradiction upsets their view that government exists to protect the public. </div>
<div>
I like to protect people, too. In fact, I am right now trying to protect people from out of control government employees. However, I am not trying to protect people by basing my thoughts and actions on my emotions, rather I am basing my thoughts and actions on truth, liberty, and love your neighbor in such a way as to not contradict myself. I cannot claim to love my neighbors if I am willing to fine some of my neighbors $1500.00 for publishing a truthful list of their skills and posting them on a private bulletin board. However, many politicians and bureaucrats DO contradict themselves and deceive themselves by rationalizing, <i>"For the protection of the greater public, some individuals must necessarily be punished and oppressed by government regulations and penalties. Regardless of constitutional prohibitions..." </i>Boy, doesn't that sound reasonable and wise!!!??? Well, to most Real People, it does sound wise. BUT, that is not what the proper role of good government is. According to our constitutions, good government maintains liberty and justice for all, and it protects We the People <u>from foreign invasion</u>. Good government does not attempt to protect individuals from each other! I suppose we could put a government employee security guard in every house, and even have one to follow each individual around in order for government to protect the public!!!</div>
<div>
A civilized society does not need tight management and control by bureaucrats and authoritarians, rather a civilized society functions on its ability to morally, honestly, and wisely govern itself with liberty and justice for all. That is what good neighbors who care about these things (love one another) do!!! I care just as much for the individual as I care for the majority. IT IS THE MISGUIDED SMARTER-THAN-EVERYONE-ELSE bureaucrats and politicians who manipulate emotions to distort common sense and common decency for their own power and prestige. And they suck Real People into going along with their nonsense in la-la land! The above email is from a Real Person who is "very new" to his government job. Will [he] be sucked into the control freak "government is the savior" mentality, or will [he] decide to side with our founding fathers who created a constitutional republic that places limits on government in order to maintain liberty and justice for all?<br />
<br />
<i style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Sometimes legislators feel they have their hands tied during session, and can only sneak little amendments past the majority party. </i><br />
<br />
Obviously, the legislators are not united on the founding principles espoused by our founding fathers. They do not have a common vision, therefore each one feels helpless to effect positive change in government. This is the predicament of the conservative legislator because the "government is savior" legislators ARE UNITED on their efforts to prove that each of them are "saviors" who deserve the love and respect of We the People. For the "saviors," more government and more taxes will lead to prestige and utopia, and perhaps their name on a government building, too! Lenin, Stalin, ans Hitler had their pictures all over government buildings. SEE! IT SHOULD BE VERY EASY TO DEFEAT THE "GOVERNMENT IS SAVIOR" CROWD! But, the conservatives won't stand united on our Supreme Law of the Land, or on liberty and justice for all. Please note that Karl Marx also wanted to use government to create a "workers' paradise." George Washington simply wanted liberty and justice for all...<br />
<br />
<i style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Without people like you to tell us, I’m not sure we would have any idea what to change—</i><br />
<br />
Most of We the People do not want to deal with government. The less contact with government in their lives, the better. Unfortunately, it takes a pissed off self-educated individual like me to stand up to government abuse. The rest of We the People would prefer to stay out of arguments with government employees. I can't blame them. Arguing with a government employee is the same as arguing with an idiot in an insane asylum--as demonstrated by this blog!<br />
<br />
<i style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">it’s easy for us to research policy all day and want to overhaul an entire tax system</i><br />
<br />
WOW! See??? This person has grand ideas and hope! They WISH they could "overhaul an entire tax system" to get government out of We the Peoples' lives.<br />
<br />
<i style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">but the little policy flaws that create a big problem in the lives of [district] citizens seem to totally escape us without anyone complaining to us. </i><br />
<br />
Yes, We the People must be squeaky wheels if we want to keep our constitutions, liberty, and justice for all. Basically, big government and big money monopolies are strangling We the People while hording all the resources... Independence is quickly turning into dependence and slavery.<br />
<br />
<i style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">You’re right—there is a disconnect</i><br />
<br />
Oh, you mean that the legislator you work for has not had to deal with Washington State Department of Labor and Industries fining him $1500.00 for posting a truthful flier on a private bulletin board? How can that be? Your legislator posts signs up everywhere during election season WITHOUT GETTING FINED BY WDLI! Our constitutions say that we have equal protection under the law. Seems that I should be able to post truthful signs just the same as your legislator does! THERE IS A DISCONNECT THROUGHOUT ALL OF GOVERNMENT! THE IDIOTS WHO ISSUED MY CITATIONS ARE DISCONNECTED FROM OUR SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, AND ALL OF THE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES I HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH ARE DISCONNECTED FROM OUR SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, ALTHOUGH MANY MANY OF OUR LOVED ONES HAVE GIVEN LIFE AND LIMB TO PRESERVE OUR CONSTITUTIONS FOR OUR POSTERITY. Geeze!!! I just can't believe how stupid the people I have been dealing with are... If we had decent government schools churning out wise and responsible Real People (and government employees) who love liberty and justice for all, I would not need to be writing this!<br />
Anyway, I really appreciate this Real Person who had the courtesy to truthfully respond to my email.<br />
Would you believe that I got an email response from one of the "government is savior" legislators? I DID!!! Check it out:<br />
<br />
<i><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica; font-size: 13px;">From: Sen. Adam Kline</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica; font-size: 13px;">To: ME</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica; font-size: 13px;">Sent: Tue, Sep 23, 2014 11:38 am</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica; font-size: 13px;">Subject: RE: NC RR: Man fined $1500.00 for looking for a job.</span></i><br />
<div id="AOLMsgPart_0_a564b529-8bcd-4fb5-8603-b835b40879bf" style="background-color: white; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; margin: 0px;">
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>Sorry, I haven't seen any set of facts that show a man being fined any amount
for simply looking for a job. Can you show me an objective source (a court, an
agency, something with a file number or some other way to verify it), that tells
me that some guy is being smacked ONLY for looking for a job? I will be very
surprised if you can. I suspect that if some guy is being punished by a court
or the police or some government agency, it's for something other than just
job-hunting. Given my past experience with right-wing bloggers, I suspect that
you are trying to turn it into a story of government employees harassing poor
innocent job-seekers, because that fits in with the story you always seem to
want us to believe: that government is bad, always inept, wasteful, worthless.
I think the real story is that for the past 30 years, big business has been
"re-educating" folks to believe that line, because it results in an erosion of
public support for state and federal governments. Those are the levels of
government that prevent them from polluting the environment, exploiting their
workers, and such. All those " government regulations" that protect our air and
water, that protect working people from being abused and over-worked and
under-paid by their bosses, all those regulations would be a lot weaker if the
same folks who are protected by them could be re-educated into fearing them.
Those regulations cut into their bottom lines, which is the only thing important
to them. And that's what we hear from big business, the US Chamber of Commerce,
the Heritage Foundation. Seems you buy it, huh?
So don't just tell me your side of this story about this guy who was fined for
looking for a job and nothing else--show me the actual documents, the record,
with the guy's name and phone so I can call and verify, and get to the bottom of
it.
Adam Kline</i>
</tt></pre>
<div>
<tt><br /></tt></div>
</div>
I am going to dissect this nonsense, but first here is my response to him:<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">>>>>>></span>Sen. Kline,</div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial;">The set of facts you are looking for are included in the Blog. All correspondence from government employees has been uploaded to the blog, including pertinent parts of hearing transcripts. The FINAL ORDER of Administrative Law Judge Mark Kim states:</span><i style="background-color: white; font-family: arial;"> </i><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial; font-size: small;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial; font-size: small;">
<i>"It appears to this tribunal that the penalty in the Appellant's case seems extreme in light of the fact that the Appellant was only seeking minor jobs hoping to earn some extra income. Further, it appears to this tribunal that the legislature has written RCW 18.27.200)1) so broadly that it essentially covers almost every activity of work, some of which might not directly impact the public policy purposes of the statute."</i><br />
<br />
Publishing a list of your skills and posting it on a private bulletin board is protected under our Supreme Laws of the Land, both state and federal constitutions. Get a grip! </div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial; font-size: small;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial; font-size: small;">
Now that you have what you asked for, bone up on the truth and do the right thing for We the People whom you have taken an Oath of Office to serve under the constraints of our state and federal constitutions. Thank you very much!</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial; font-size: small;">
Warm Regards, </div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: arial; font-size: small;">
Russ Hinds<<<<<<<<</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
The first thing I noticed in Adam Kline's email was the bullying tone. In his arrogance, he thinks that he is right and everyone else is wrong. When a weak constitutional legislator is confronted by Adam Kline's diatribe, the weak constitutionalist will shut down the debate because he knows that it will not be productive, and if the debate is pressed, the debate will likely escalate into a heated argument. WELL! THAT IS WHAT ADAM KLINE WANTS! Kline wants the discussion to stop, and stop with his views being the dominant views. See? Rather than serve the public, Adam Kline wants to dominate the public and dominate his constitutionalist small government colleagues.<br />
Now look, the only way to defeat an out-of-control idiot like Adam Kline is to INSIST that our Supreme Law of the Land is SUPREME. It is supreme because the liberties and rights protected within our state and federal constitutions have been paid for with the blood and sacrifice of our fellow citizens who serve in the armed forces and elsewhere. And this is obviously where our small government representatives have fallen short. They will not unite and stand on our Supreme Law of the Land to guarantee the right to publish a list of your skills, the right to free association (our right to choose whom you may serve and/or who may perform services for you), and our right to a speedy trial by a jury of our good neighbors before our liberties and property can be taken by government employees. Our weak "conservative" small government representatives won't pull their weapon out of its holster. Our forefathers gave us a huge cannon, our Supreme Law of the Land, to stand behind, but the fraidy cats won't stand together behind it. Been that way for 50 years, while the Adam Klines have been allowed to run amuck to grow government and grow taxes with no end in sight!!!<br />
The first sentence in Adam Kline's email sets forth the "bullying tone:"<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>Sorry, I haven't seen any set of facts that show a man being fined any amount
for simply looking for a job.</i></tt></pre>
<br />
Kline starts out by implying that I may be lying in my title and subject line, "Man fined $1500.00 for looking for a job." Yep! He wants me to get on the defensive with shaky knees. He is in control of this discussion, and he will set forth the "truth" and set me straight by pointing out that I am dishonest in my title, "Man fined $1500.00 for Looking for a Job." LOL! ...Kline buddy! You are dishonest in your inference that a member of We the People would contact your office armed with lies and nonsense. IT IS YOUR OFFICE THAT IS FULL OF LIES AND NONSENSE THAT HAS LED TO GOVERNMENT BEING FAR OUTSIDE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS! Russ doesn't lie.<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i> Can you show me an objective source (a court, an agency, something with a file number or some other way to verify it), that tells me that some guy is being smacked ONLY for looking for a job? </i></tt></pre>
<br />
Here again, Kline is implying that I am distorting the facts of the case. He wants to narrow it down to the actual reason I was fined. Perhaps he can force me to admit that I posted an untruthful flyer, perhaps committed fraud by claiming to have licenses... Kline is fishing for a wobbly spot in my courageous stand. He wants to intimidate me into admitting error on my part, "What was the real reason you were fined?" IDIOT! I was fined for hanging a flyer in a bulletin board in an effort to find a job! CLEAR AND SIMPLE! AND CLEARLY UNLAWFUL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL FINES IMPOSED.<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>I will be very surprised if you can.</i></tt></pre>
<br />
Be surprised then! Open your closed mind. Dump the idea that government is always right!<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>I suspect that if some guy is being punished by a court or the police or some government agency, </i></tt></pre>
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>it's for something other than just job-hunting.</i></tt></pre>
<br />
Yeah buddy, that is what you want to believe! Still on your high horse, huh? Still trying to imply that I am a liar, huh? Good grief! Your "government is god" mentality is failing you. You need to humble yourself and come down to earth, truth, reality, common sense, common decency, and constitutional government. Yeah buddy, your government agenda and your government employees have really overstepped here on this one! And NO! You do not have me shaking in my boots! You are not reducing my statements to mush, rather you are exposing your own superiority complex which clouds your view of reality.<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i> Given my past experience with right-wing bloggers, I suspect that
you are trying to turn it into a story of government employees harassing poor
innocent job-seekers, because that fits in with the story you always seem to
want us to believe: that government is bad, always inept, wasteful, worthless.</i></tt></pre>
<br />
Don't you know your history? Don't you know the truth? Government is bad, especially when people like you hold positions in government. People like you seek to justify everything government does while seeking to expand everything government does. When government is clearly shown to be outside of constitutional restraints, you seek to bury the whistle blower, or the citizen standing up for his constitutionally protected God-given rights. Here is some true history:<br />
George Washington said, "Government is like fire, a dangerous servant and a fearful master." And George Washington is proven to be right in the 20th century. In the 20th century, millions and millions of people have been murdered NOT BY FOREIGN INVASION, but by their own government employees. Government employees trapped in the belief that "government is always right" always go along with orders coming from their "smarter-than-everyone-else" leaders. Uneducated ignorant government employees want to keep "just doing my job to feed my family" issuing $1500.00 fines to people who post innocent fliers on private bulletin boards. And you, Adam Kline, want to protect government employees who disregard our Supreme Law of the Land. You want to justify fining a member of We the People $1500.00 for looking for a job and deny him his right to a speedy trial by a jury of his good neighbors. You, Adam Kline are disregarding your own Oath of Office, and you somehow think you can get away with it by your clever use of words and bullying tactics. You are freaking unstable, man! Have you considered counseling? And, perhaps training in civility and constitutional government? I can see foam dribbling from the corners of your mouth as you attempt to put this "right-wing blogger" to shame.<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>I think the real story is that for the past 30 years, big business has been
"re-educating" folks to believe that line, because it results in an erosion of
public support for state and federal governments.</i></tt></pre>
<br />
WOW! What a warped sense of reality you have! "Big business" isn't running the government indoctrination centers, the public schools. Big government has been re-educating the last 3 generations to blindly follow government commands. Public support for state and federal governments is "eroding" because those governments are disregarding our Supreme Law of the Land and expanding beyond reason. In fact, it has expanded so much that bureaucrats and ALL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES are not held accountable to our Supreme Law of the Land. Add to that the fact that corruption has infiltrated the huge bureaucracies. The behemoth of state bureaucracies has become unmanageable by We the People and our elected representatives. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LIKE YOURSELF MUST EARN THE RESPECT OF THE PEOPLE YOU ARE SERVING! You don't do that by disregarding your Oath of Office! And you don't earn respect by allowing the bureaucrats and government lawyers to go completely nuts in their misapplication of law.<br />
Yes, I have grievances with the "big business" monopolies who have taken free market competition out of banking and energy production...<br />
<br />
<pre><tt><i><span style="font-size: 9pt;">Those are the levels of government that prevent them from polluting the environment, exploiting </span></i></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><i><span style="font-size: 9pt;">their workers, and such. All those " government regulations" that protect our air and water, that protect working people from being abused and over-worked and under-paid by their bosses, all </span></i></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><i><span style="font-size: 9pt;">those regulations would be a lot weaker if the same folks who are protected by them could be </span></i></tt></pre>
<pre><tt><i><span style="font-size: 9pt;">re-</span><span style="font-size: 12px;">educated into</span><span style="font-size: 9pt;"> fearing them.</span></i></tt></pre>
<br />
My, my... What an idealized view of yourself you have. You see your role in government as though you are preventing "polluting the environment, exploiting workers, and such." You are even protecting the "working people from being over-worked and under-paid." You think that the world would turn into hell if it wasn't for your government regulations. THAT IS NOT TRUE! The truth is, many business owners care a great deal about their employees and about our environment. Yet, you and your ilk want to treat all business owners as if they want to exploit their employees and destroy the environment. In your mind, everyone and every business owner is guilty until proven innocent. Good grief! <br />
Well, America functioned a lot better 100 years ago when when there were much fewer regulations. America came through the industrial revolution in flying colors! Bad business practices were dealt with locally and a huge prosperous middle class came into existence in the 1950s. One parent, the father, could provide for the family--purchase a house, a car, and pay the bills, and even send their children to college. BUT IT HAS BEEN THE EXPANDING GOVERNMENT THAT HAS SUCKED THE LIFE OUT OF THE AMERICAN DREAM. It has been government that has tried to be the father and provider of food (food stamps), shelter (free rent), education (free atrocious government schools), and free healthcare (free abortions for the irresponsible promiscuous). Government has EXPLODED taxation (slavery to the state) in order to pay for all of that! Government rewarding irresponsibility and ignorance with welfare, free rent, free atrocious education, and free healthcare has also led to the destruction of the American Dream. Obviously, those stuck in ignorance and poverty have no incentive to improve and educate themselves if government is going to provide for them. Also, I DO NOT WISH TO BE CONTRIBUTING MY TAX DOLLARS TO KEEPING PEOPLE STUCK IN IGNORANCE AND IRRESPONSIBILITY! It horrifies me to think that my tax dollars are contributing to keeping people ignorant and irresponsible. I DO NOT LIVE IN YOUR LA-LA LAND!<br />
Too many people like you are running around trying to be saviors of We the People, saving us from your invented boogie men. You do not need to save the public from me. I am not a boogie man and I am not a danger to the public. If you think I am a danger to the public, then give me my "speedy trial by jury" and get your conviction before you take my liberties and property from me. Your regulations are unconstitutional, and I am calling you out on that. I have had enough of government nonsense and I will look you in the eye and tell you to get out of my face, off my back, and mind your own business!<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>Those regulations cut into their bottom lines, which is the only thing important
to them. And that's what we hear from big business, the US Chamber of Commerce,
the Heritage Foundation. Seems you buy it, huh?</i></tt></pre>
<br />
Your regulations do cut into their bottom lines. Your regulations cut into my bottom line and restrict my liberty and rights. I would rather deal with a boss who is unfair and obnoxious, than deal with an out of control government employee who is unfair and obnoxious.<br />
Thanks to misguided politicians, America has destroyed itself slowly and incrementally starting with the creation of the income tax 100 years ago. In order to collect an income tax, every individual must report their income, rather than only corporations opening their books. Once you give government the power to scrutinize your income, every other abuse of government follows. Silly government employees like you think that you need to "manage incomes and the economy." The personal income tax opens the door for tracking every transaction between every individual in order to collect the income tax. Our constitutionally protected right to privacy has left the building. The free market economy has left the building. Under misguided people like you, the managed and controlled economy has replaced the free market economy.<br />
Now, I hear people like you complaining about the "underground economy" as if that is something to be feared. The truth is, there is no such thing as an underground economy. There is ONLY the free market economy where people are free to engage in transactions according to their own free will, and the managed economy where people must jump through government hoops and regulations in order to conduct business.<br />
I would like to return to simple. I want to be responsible for myself and family. I want to provide for my own food, rent, education, and healthcare. I just want to work with my neighbors to generate an income without government interference. I don't want you to enlist my neighbor "employer" to be your tax collector who deprives me of part of my income to give it to you and your government buddies. You and your government buddies have been misusing tax dollars for many decades and I don't want to share in your guilt!<br />
"The power to tax is the power to destroy," said Daniel Webster and John Marshall. I do not want to participate with you in destroying our once free and good nation. You and others of your mindset who disregard our constitutions have been destroying this nation for decades, slowly and incrementally. And in some evil cases, deliberately in order to reduce America's libertarian freedom loving influence upon the world. You need an epiphany back to supporting our Supreme Law of the Land and "maintaining individual rights." Local governance governs best. America does not need your centralized "control everything" big government impoverishing its own citizens through taxation, regulation, and centralized management. The USSR already tried that!... That is why we need the Heritage Foundation and the Freedom Foundation.<br />
<br />
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt><i>So don't just tell me your side of this story about this guy who was fined for
looking for a job and nothing else--show me the actual documents, the record,
with the guy's name and phone so I can call and verify, and get to the bottom of
it.
Adam Kline</i></tt></pre>
<br />
I did respond to you pointing out that the documents you seek are included in the blog. It is a complete journal of my dealings with people who play child's games trying to convince me that I am a bad neighbor for hanging a flier on a private bulletin board, and who has no constitutionally protected freedom and the right to a speedy trial by jury. You know damn well that I have those rights and freedoms! Therefore, I hope you do "get to the bottom of it" and have that epiphany! Stop trying to bullshit me, and try to get some integrity and honesty for yourself and for the entire legislature!<br />
<br />
So, how will the real person in the first email decide? Will [he] fall on my side or Adam Kline's side? I will email this UPDATE to the entire legislature, also. I really want to thank Adam Kline for providing the opportunity. I hope he is thoroughly embarrassed! Perhaps he may come back to his senses instead of leaving reality in the dirt while seeking to live in his own la-la land. Time for that epiphany Adam! Time to examine your Oath of Office in order to competently serve We the People. Do your job and make the bureaucrats, government lawyers, and judges abide by our Supreme Law of the Land. To do that, you must stop pretending that they are abiding by our Supreme Law of the Land. That way, you can stop pretending to be a statesman for We the People, and become a true statesman who adheres to your Oath of Office and holds government employees to account maintaining individual rights just as our state constitution requires!<br />
Get a grip! You lose, and I win because I have the simple truth on my side!<br />
<br />
<b>EDIT: </b><br />
I just went to Adam Kline's Senate web page to see what this guy looked like. He has an interesting and appalling video on his Senate web page. It was interesting to see that the guy has found a clever way to intimidate his colleagues in the state senate. His mild demeanor also seems to give him some influence with his colleagues. But, judging from his clever words, I would say that he is passive aggressive. Unlike his aggressive email to me, Kline seems to capitalize on his clever words.<br />
Quote from the 1:38 point in the video: <i>"As a consequence, people here(in the state senate) think that it is me who is a little, you know, in your face sometimes, ...pause.. It's the district. It is not me... the 37th is a very progressive... very curious district, very upstanding kind of a place. ..." </i><br />
What I take from those words is this:<br />
Mr. Kline is not responsible for his votes and the bills he sponsors in the state senate. If his colleagues want to restrain his efforts to expand "progressive" government, they are not dealing with Mr. Kline, rather they are dealing with the entire 37th district. Evidently, Mr Kline's district has asked him to ignore his Oath of Office to support our state and federal constitutions. Evidently, Kline has put himself in a Vulcan mind meld with his entire district, and they have bestowed kingship on him to lead them into battle against the rest of the state's districts. If a conservative senator attempts to restrain Kline's efforts to "progressively" expand state government, then that conservative senator is not confronting Kline and his irresponsible disregard of our Supreme Law of the Land, rather that conservative senator is confronting the entire 37th district. And that entire district wants to increase taxes and expand government. That district wants to increase taxes on the rest of the state AND it wants to determine how to spend the increased tax moneys collected. Is the 37th district that self centered? Or is Kline deluding himself?<br />
Mr. Kline, We the People of the state of Washington have not repealed any part of our state and federal constitutions, and we have not thrown out your Oath of Office to support those constitutions.You have taken it upon yourself to join with the "progressive" caucus and join them in disregarding our state and federal constitutions--which obviously you dishonestly took an Oath of Office to support! Is the 37th district really backing up your dishonesty? Are they as dishonest as you? Does your district really want to siphon off more money from the rest of Washington's We the People and appoint you to determine how to spend that money? Mr. Kline, I think you are deluded. You really need that epiphany to support "liberty and justice for all, and "government is established to maintain individual rights." Government is not established to trample individual rights... Dude, you need to get educated beyond a sophomore in high school and beyond Karl Marx's delusions. Think man, THINK!<br />
Start out your thinking right here with C.S. Lewis:<br />
<div style="line-height: 0.23in; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: #333333;">“</span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;"><i>Of
all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under
robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber
baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point
be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment
us without end for they do so with the approval of their own
conscience." </i></span></span></span>
</div>
Check your conscience Mr. Kline. Respect our individual rights and freedoms as they are protected in our Supreme Law of the Land. I do have a right to publish a list of my skills in an effort to find a job, and I do have a right to a speedy trial by a jury of my good neighbors before government employees can take my liberty and property.... My father and 3 of my sons risked their lives to preserve those rights and liberties by taking an Oath to defend our constitutions from all enemies, foreign and domestic. I cannot bow to your delusions and the delusions of the rest of your "progressive" conspirators.<br />
Here is the url to the video:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://sdc.wastateleg.org/kline/2014/03/21/sen-kline-video-update-32114/">http://sdc.wastateleg.org/kline/2014/03/21/sen-kline-video-update-32114/</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Russ Hindshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00687461165747198267noreply@blogger.com0