February 28, 2015, UPDATE: My response to Alliance One collection agency. Hilarious!

   Chief Electrical Inspector Stephen D. Thornton did as he said in his letter to me. On February 25th, I received an Alliance One account statement. My oh my, how people think they can open up an account in my name... Good grief! This stuff really is getting silly. Of course the account statement demanding payment did not have a name on it. Once again, no one wants to take responsibility. Now, it appears a corporation is violating my constitutionally protected rights. No individual is responsible for conducting themselves in a manner that is civilized and in compliance with our Supreme Laws of the Land.
     In the letter Stephen sent me, I quote, "All further inquiry regarding payment should be made to Alliance One at 1-800-456-8838." It appears Stephen does not want to talk to me about payment anymore. So, evidently he is not responsible anymore. Evidently, government employees "just doing their job" are not to be considered responsible for their actions and the injury that their actions produce. Only citizens are to be considered responsible for their actions. Government employees and people working for corporations are not responsible for their actions.
     I called up Alliance One and finally got a human representative on the phone. I gave her the account number, then she asked me for my Social Security number. I said I would not give that to her. Then she asked for my drivers license number. Wouldn't give that to her, either. Then I explained to her the fact that the fines are bogus and fly in the face of our Supreme Law of the Land. I started to tell her about my 1st Amendment right to publish a list of my skills and also about my right to a trial by jury before my liberty and property could be taken from me. She would not have any part of that discussion. "I am not here to argue with you," she said in a terse annoyed tone. And get this, she said, "You need to take it up with WDLI and not me!"
    I said, "WDLI told me to take it up with you," but she is the boss, and I must not annoy the boss...     "I am going to hang up..." To which I gave her some choice last words before she could hang up.         Obviously, I can't have a sensible conversation with idiots who refuse to take responsibility for their actions.
    I had to respond in writing to the Account Statement demanding payment. It appears that Alliance One picked some numbers out of the air and added to the fine. Assigned Interest: $258.48, and Other Fees or Charges: $148.70. Alliance One now claims that I owe them $907.18. That makes me laugh! Who do these people think they are? My goodness! I'd be ashamed of myself if I were doing what they do. So, here is the Alliance One statement:

Here is my response:

February 28, 2015

TO: Unnamed individual

Alliance One

6565 Kimbal Drive, Suite 200

Gig Harbor, Washington 98335

FROM: Russ Hinds

10421 E Jutte Lane

Elk, WA 99009

SUBJECT: Account No. 32782297

Dear unnamed individual,

As I am a individual who takes responsibility for my actions, I correctly expect other individuals to take responsibility for their actions. Please provide the name of an official contact within your company who is taking responsibility for collecting on the above invented bogus account which has been wrongfully created within your company in order to unlawfully collect an unlawful fine which Washington Department of Labor and Industries illegally issued in complete disregard of our Supreme Law of the Land.
Please note that our state and federal constitutions protect the right of citizens to publish a list of their skills. Therefore, fining an individual $500.00 for posting an innocent flier on a private bulletin board is an unconstitutional act that flies in the face of our Supreme Law of the Land.

Also note that attempting to collect a fine without a conviction of a jury of good neighbors violates our Supreme Laws of the Land. Depriving individuals of their right to due process of law is strictly prohibited in our state and federal constitutions.

Simple... very simple. I am not here to try and repeat your 6^th grade civic lessons in order to educate you to your civic duty to support and defend our state and federal constitutions, however, I will remind you that our American military servicemen and women have given much life, limb, and treasure to defend our Supreme Laws of the Land against all enemies foreign and domestic according to their sworn Oath. My father and three of my sons have taken this oath and risked their lives in service to this nation to preserve the God given rights of individuals, such as you and I, which are protected in our state and federal constitutions with the intent of being preserved for our posterity. Please get a grip on yourself and take up your civic duty to defend our Supreme Law of the Land.

With that being said, please provide me with a name of the individual responsible for attempting to collect on a bogus $500.00 fine, plus a bogus $258.48 in assigned interest(???), plus bogus $148.70 in “other fees and charges.” This great state and nation are founded upon individual responsibility. We are, as good citizens, required to act in an open, civilized, and courteous manner toward one another. When that fails to happen, there are appropriate legal measures that must be taken.

I already have all of the names of the government employees involved in depriving their neighbor(me) of due process of law, however, I do not have the name of the individual who sent me the enclosed Account Statement demanding payment. Please provide the name so that I may be of assistance in providing the facts of my case for his protection. Colluding with government employees to undermine our Supreme Laws of the Land is the opposite of the Rule of Law and detrimental to a civilized society of intelligent and responsible individuals.

Sincerely,

Russ Hinds enclosure

    Are there any intelligent responsible individuals on the planet? I think there are quite a few, however, they do not work for government and the corporations feeding off the government. I am still looking for government employees who know their 6th grade civics lessons...
   I will need to pass this on to my representatives in the state legislature for their amusement. I won't find many who are willing to defend our constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic... If they could only see how they are making themselves and others look like complete asses. It must be way too difficult for them to do their simple and clear civic duty! Think about it! They would rather do the wrong thing than do the simple and clear right thing! Isn't it way beyond embarrassing? Perhaps their ego is such that they simply cannot admit to making a mistake. I admit my mistakes, when I make them. But, I don't admit to bogus accusations from people bent on destroying our constitutional republic.
   Let the readers decide who is speaking from a foundation of truth and right, and who is trying desperately to defend unconstitutional abuse and provocations.

February 9, 2015, UPDATE: Got a response from WDLI Director Joel Sacks.

     There are 2 great things about this blog. First, it gives the reader a complete play by play reality of dealing with government employees after they trap you in their web of nonsense. This documented play by play shows exactly how government employees perform their duties apart from any consideration of our state and federal constitutions which protect our God given rights and liberties. Second, this blog zeros in on how differences in belief systems within the minds of individuals affect the operations of government toward the governed.
    The differences in belief systems between the "governors" and the "governed" also came to the forefront of political discussion in the 1600s, the 1700s, and the 1800s, prior to and after our Founding Fathers. During the Great Reformation and Renaissance, the printing press produced a great deal of writings which did profoundly change the way rulers governed their citizens. The Dark Ages gave way to the Renaissance.
    If you read the documents which were read by our founding fathers you can find writings that favor and support the power and word of the king over his citizens, and you can find documents that favor limiting the power of kings and his dictates over their citizens. Off the top of my head, I remember reading a document, or treatise, that portrayed a king as a "father" over the people-which then went on to say that the kings word was law because he cares about his subjects like a father cares for his children. Someone actually wrote that nonsense and believed it! Somehow, even when the king's edicts were immoral and criminal, his words carried the magic that required the citizens to believe them. Unfortunately, a lot of dupes fell for the magical and all powerful words and authority of the king. On the other hand, the treatises opposing the power of dictatorial kings won the day, and the Founding Fathers fashioned the U.S. Constitution as the foundation of what came to be the most free and prosperous country ever to exist upon the earth in known history.
    I am fascinated by this blog because it seems to be repeating the the debates of the Renaissance! The letter I received from the Director Joel Sacks absolutely demonstrates the truth of what I have just written. Imagine the arrogance of the established rulers of the Dark Ages. If you were a king, just imagine the arrogance required to assume that your word is law. Imagine being a king and expecting everyone to believe and go along with your words with respect and submission. Could you as a sensible and free American actually go along with such arrogance in deceiving yourself in the same way the Dark Age kings deceived themselves? I could not do that, but it seems the bureaucrats in Washington State government have the same mental aptitude as the silly corrupt kings which our forefathers fled and threw off during the American Revolutionary war.
   Let's do a contrast. Here are the last paragraphs of my letter to Dir. Joel Sacks:

----My defense, my arguments, and protests are all based on the factual history of this USA and on the natural rights of man which are protected in our Supreme Law of the Land. I am quite capable of independent thought based in truth, common sense, and common decency and based in OUR civic duty to uphold our state and federal constitutions. Are you capable, or do you prefer to follow the misguided crowd down the road to tyranny?
The citation, fine, and Account Statement billing me $500.00 are bogus and outside of law. I have not been convicted of a crime by a jury of my good neighbors. Your efforts to collect the fine are lawless acts in a nation founded upon the Rule of Law. Ignoring the Supreme Law of the Land is a lawless act and is still considered treason by those who have given life, limb, and treasure to preserve our Supreme Law of the Land for their posterity.
Please withdraw your citations and comply with our state and federal Constitutions.

Sincerely, 

Russ Hinds----

 I am delighted that my writing conforms to the writings of our Founding Fathers and the pamphleteers who wrote in opposition to all-powerful kings. Now, read and contrast the response I received from Dir. Joel Sacks:

    I hope the following comments dissecting the letter above expose our opposing beliefs which guide our thoughts and actions. You, the reader, must decide whose words are true and carry more weight. Hopefully, this exorcise, and this blog, inspires you to take action and repair or replace people in government who are failing to govern within the constraints of their charter, the Constitution of the State of Washington. Seek inspiration from our Declaration of Independence.
     First, the letter opens cordially, thanking me for the letter I sent to Dir. Joel Sacks. I appreciate the semblance of civility.
    Second, Joel Sacks asks Chief Electrical Inspector Stephen D. Thornton to write the response. Joel Sacks is a figurehead. He is not there to rock the boat, rather he is there to advise on issues after being briefed on the pros and cons of the issue by government employees and lobbyists. In this case, Sacks chose to avoid taking a stand and passed on the responsibility to CEI Thornton. Sacks takes an Oath of Office to support our state and federal constitutions. CEI Thornton does not take an Oath of Office and he is not a constitutional lawyer. He is simply a government employee with a background in the Electrical Field and business.    Electrical Currants 
   Thornton will naturally tend to maintain the status quo, and he is just another obstacle in my path to get my grievance resolved according to our state and federal constitutions. Thornton does not have the gonads to approach Joel Sacks and tell him that he(Thornton) is not qualified to address the constitutional law I used to substantiate my grievance. Thornton should have given the task of responding to my letter back to Sacks advising him to get the proper legal advice from a constitutional lawyer, either on staff, in the private sector, or preferably both. HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MUCKING THINGS UP IN ORDER TO AVOID MAKING A CORRECT DECISION BASED ON OUR SIMPLE AND PLAIN STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS. According to what I learned in sixth grade government school, both Sacks and Thornton are not qualified to serve in their positions. Sacks should have been knowledgeable enough to get proper counsel. They are simply not interested in adhering to or standing up for our state and federal constitutions. In sixth grade, I learned that it is every citizen's civic duty to support our constitutions, and that includes government employees. --Those are minimum statements which do not take into account any DELIBERATE motives for disregarding our state and federal constitutions. It is my experience with government employees that makes me believe that they are just fearful and cowardly people going along with the crowd without sticking their neck out. They don't have the confidence to actually take a stand for their Oath of Office, therefore they seek every possible way to pass the buck and avoid taking responsibility for running the government according to the plain and simple words of our Supreme Laws of the Land. People like me who say that our rights protected in our constitutions are Supreme scare the heck out of government employees. And of course the government employees want the general public to be afraid of us, too. Just look at the methods used to demonize people who are standing up for our right to bear arms.
   Third, Thornton declines to waive the penalty for their citation based on his belief that it was issued for appropriate reasons, which is supported by another low rank government employee, Faith Jeffery. Obviously, these guys are just the "king's minions" going along with the dictates of the king. The kings of the Dark Ages avoided any discussion of morality and justice in the administration of their dictates. Thornton avoids any discussion of morality, justice, AND our Supreme Law of the Land while making the unsupported statement that the citation was "appropriate." He is "just doing his job." There are no government employees and very few legislators who will do their civic duty to support our state and federal constitutions. They prefer living in their world of nonsense ignoring the life, limb, and treasure given to defend our constitutions from all enemies foreign and domestic. They live in a comfort zone of make believe.
   Fourth, Thornton makes the wild statement that I exorcised my "full due process right" and appealed the citation through 4 levels of judicial review. Truth is, I was never given any "due process rights." I purchased my right to appeal by paying $450.00 to request a "due process" trial by a jury of my good neighbors, who would do their civic duty to support our state and federal constitutions. My constitutionally protected right to a trial by jury was never granted to me by the king's minions. I advise Thornton and Sacks to read our Declaration of Independence before assuming that their words contain magic that will make me believe them. Sorry guys, I cannot lower myself to submitting to words pulled out of thin air and without any basis in simple truth. Cobbling words together on a piece of paper on your false assumption that they make sense does not cast a spell on me, nor pull the wool over my eyes. Obviously, I do not live in your world of nonsense and make believe, which is where the kings of the Dark Ages lived. I live in a world in which good men have given life, limb, and treasure to preserve the rights and liberties which are protected in our state and federal constitutions for our posterity.
     I have, once again, failed to find any responsible government employees who will do their civic duty to support and defend our state and federal constitutions. This is pitiful... I have worked very hard to educate and animate government employees to follow our Supreme Law of the Land.

    Let the reader judge for himself who is speaking the truth...

    One more thing. When a legislator contacts Joel Sacks about my grievance, they are spoken to in the same manner as Thornton's letter above. If the legislator is an average citizen mis-educated in a government school just like the rest of the government employees, then the words spoken in the same manner as found in Thornton's letter will likely suffice to pull the wool over the legislator's eyes... The legislator simply does not have the education that our founding fathers had, or even the basic education I have. They will fall for the bureaucrats' nonsense and lies. If the citizens of America cannot unite on our founding documents, then the enemies of America have won by successfully dividing and conquering. If government employees are not accountable to uphold and defend the rights protected in our constitutions, then there is nothing left that they are accountable to. Without the constitution, they are free to do anything they desire to do. For examples of things that unaccountable government does, look at the list of things in our Declaration of Independence. All across the land of the free and the home of the brave, government employees are doing the same things King George did prior to our Revolutionary War.
    Do you see what I see? How can we return to our state and federal constitutions? We are a people in need of an education. "My people perish for lack of knowledge."